Princess Banana Hammock wrote:I think these protests are great. It's good to see people taking an interest in what's happening across the globe and raising awareness.
I certainly have no objection to people protesting in something they believe in or want to take a strong stance on. Bad things happen because people don't take a stand often enough.
The problem comes into this is the motive behind it. I'm sure the majority of these people are well meaning, however, if they're being 'pushed' by lobbyists with a greater agenda, what happens if that agenda is met?
If this is somehow related to the renewed DP Port bid, and lets say the bid falls through or is blocked by congress, will these people then turn around and say "our work here is done" and then leave the well meaning individuals with no support? Will the same cries of "Change UAE Slave Labor" still be heard?
However, I don't think that these protests are going to affect their salaries very much. Personally, I would rather protest against their safety and living conditions as I feel these are much more concerning issues.
Group 4 Securicor recently spent an extensive amount of money building a new style labour camp. They were given great rooms with no more than 4 to a spacious room (most often 2), access to a cafeteria with good, clean and cheap food, a library, free internet access and free laundry facilities. The response from many workers was "This is good but we'd rather they saved the money and gave it to us." This article was printed in 7 Days no less.
I think the issue of long hours and little pay is an important one and I am truly amazed at how these guys can make ends meet but as Ian has said, part of it does come down to how they value the money that they are receiving. I am sure there are many people who do a lot less work than I do for 10 times my salary but it's all in perspective.
Unfortunately for us, a capital economy depends on a pyramid style distribution of wealth to function efficiently. There will always be 2 things:
(1) A situation where the needs of many are exploited by the needs of the few.
(2) A situation where there are many lining up to be exploited.
It's by no means an ideal scenario, it's grisley and unwelcome. I thank my monotheist creator every day that I was born into my situation. Of course, my monotheism prevents me from being jealous of Hugh Hefner or Bill Gates son and ask why I wasn't born unto a RSOB Billionaire, but it's all about perspective.
What would interest me is if such protests took place within impoverished areas in India. Would this affect the number of migrants from India to the UAE to work as labourers?
I am sure they do. More needs to be done from countries like India's end to paint a picture, but therein lies another problem:
(1) The people in India go "What they get that paid that much! and have jobs? Why are they complaining?" - FWIW 25% of India live below the povery line and the GDP per capita is only $3300 US, as oposed to our homelands which are around $30,000 +. Economically poverty is a way of life.
(2) They fear that if they protest too much, the companies instead of increasing wages, will simply hire people from somewhere else in the world, which is a valid concern.
This has been the issue many human interest groups have faced in any developing nation where they'd tried to spread the "good word.". The very people they're trying to win a better deal for, resist them out of fear that they have nothing to gain and everything to lose.