This is in Iraq...
the message board for Dubai English speaking community
Chocoholic wrote:He's not actually pointing it at anyone. This is a relaxed posture. I'd be more concered about the bulge in his left pocket
Chocoholic wrote:He's not actually pointing it at anyone. This is a relaxed posture. I'd be more concered about the bulge in his left pocket
Corcovado wrote:i think if i saw NOW a man with such a HUGE gun i will be afraid and close my eyes so how about a little girl?>???? i dont think its the right time to make fun of an afraid girl infront of her an invader who might rape her tomorrow ... i am not laughing to ur jokes i am worried about the baby who her bad luck and fate put her face to face with war and terror
Corcovado wrote:How come u dont see Canada or italy or france invading another country?
mraph33 wrote:Corcovado wrote:How come u dont see Canada or italy or france invading another country?
Canada or France invade??? That you can put on the humor website. Because you can beat both of their armies together with a plastic spoon.
Corcovado wrote:KaNELLI lets think... there is war in Iraq and killing and the reason is US.. there is war in Afghanestan and the reason is US.. there is war in palestine and the reason is Israel blessed by US ..and the same in lebanon... US and ISRAEl are causing war in the world ..when they are invading countries and killing people.. How come u dont see Canada or italy or france invading another country? why its only US and its baby ISRAEL.?... Kaneli US sent Israel some missles that can destroy even more and they even said it on the news we dont wat this war to stop now
kanelli wrote:Intimacy, you are a sweet and smart guy, but people can see through these shameless attempts to continue to stir up anti-US sentiment. There are children all over the world suffering in war torn areas and you only seem to care about the Iraqi ones and most likely because you want to give people more reason to hate the US/coaltion forces in Iraq. There are also little children cowering like that in their homes if they have abusive parents. You don't need a gun to terrorise a child, and you don't need to be American either.
kanelli wrote:Corcovado wrote:i think if i saw NOW a man with such a HUGE gun i will be afraid and close my eyes so how about a little girl?>???? i dont think its the right time to make fun of an afraid girl infront of her an invader who might rape her tomorrow ... i am not laughing to ur jokes i am worried about the baby who her bad luck and fate put her face to face with war and terror
Yes, if I was a little girl I'd be frightened too to see guns and war. I pity all the children in war torn regions around the world. Too bad Intimacy never posts pictures of the children in Somalia, or Darfur etc. Then again, there are no American soldiers to vent hatred against in those kinds of pictures. (I'm a smart cookie, aren't I?)
About the raping - don't you remember that once the coalition invaded Iraq and citizens started looting, some men also raped women? The local men raped women because they knew that they could get away with it. If Saddam was still in power that little girl could also have been kidnapped from the streets by one of Saddam's relatives to be raped, as young women were in Iraq by Saddam and his sons. So, before you want to get dramatic about rape you should get some perspective and realise that any man can take it upon himself to rape if there is opportunity. He doesn't need to come from any particular part of the world.
Chocoholic wrote:Freza, There's really no need for that. Kanelli is absolutely right! And there's certainly nothing wrong with the image, which is obvious to those of us who don't go deliberately looking for evidence of bad things where there is none, which is why I said it was dangerous post in the first place.
The only sad thing about the entire picture, is that the soldier is actually in it!
Chocoholic wrote:I didn't make myself very clear in the reply and you obviously only read what you wanted to see and not what was there.
I meant Kanelli was right in the fact that it's sad people have to highlight what is going on and try and get bad reactions to an innocent photograph, when there is nothing horrible about it.
And what I said about the only sad thing about the photo is that the soldier is actually in it, means that obviously I'm against the occupation of Iraq, because if they occupying forces weren't there, then obviously there would be no soldier there to photograph.
Also I think the majority of people here know that Israels reaction is wrong and what is happening in Lebanon is wrong, no-one is denying that fact.