an excerpt from the teachings of great Martijn:
The nominee is quoted as saying that if the choice of a sexual partner were protected by the Constitution, ''prostitution, adultery, necrophilia, bestiality, possession of child pornography, and even incest and pedophilia'' also would be. He is probably mistaken, legally--but that is unfortunate. All of these acts should be legal as long as no one is coerced. They are illegal only because of prejudice and narrowmindedness.
yeah, prejudice and narrow mindedness! i guess having theses qualities is a blessing in this case..
but the fooker has a point.. if there is no "coercion" then these acts must be OK and should even be welcomed to prevail in any decent modern society.. especially the liberated act of necrophilia; where no one can ever claim there's any hint of rejection from the sexual subject and hence no coercion involved! and there's also the valid argument that no corpse in its sane mind would possibly object to any trial to bring it back to life!
so in the light of great Martijn's teachings, i say let's be broad minded about it and decriminalize necrophilia, let all those sweet necrophiliacs dig all the fresh graves they can lay their hands on in search for their legalized pleasure!
what a fcukedup moron!