A strategy document now reveals why it will be difficult for the US to veto the vote, according to Israeli newspaper Haaretz. The strategy is to go down a diplomatic route and not an armed struggle - and tackling head on the rather simple issues of ending the Israeli Military Occupation. (See previous threads on how all the issues aren't complicated and have been addressed).
Borders, status of Jerusalem, refugees right of return and compensation all addressed:
..
Most of the document’s authors support the option of an independent Palestinian state within the 1967 borders, with Jerusalem as its capital and a fair arrangement that will fulfill the right of return and the compensation of the Palestinian refugees. The document rejects the possibility of continuing the status quo, maintaining that the endless negotiations provide cover for expanding the settlements and consolidating the occupation. The authors also erase from the agenda the option of a Palestinian state with temporary borders and limited sovereignty, under effective Israeli control.
If the strategy of a diplomatic struggle for Palestinian independence − including sanctions, turning to the International Criminal Court and nonviolent resistance as in Egypt and Tunisia − does not change the situation, the group recommends switching to what the document calls Plan B: dismantling the Palestinian Authority and restoring responsibility for the West Bank’s inhabitants to Israel. The authors are not ignoring the price their public would pay for that, but wonder what honorable option would remain.
If it turns out that this option is unattainable, the authors recommend working toward a model of a binational state or democratic state without distinction between Israel and Palestinian citizens. Another possibility is a confederation between Jordan and the Palestinian state
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-d ... e-1.381426
It will be hard to spin these facts, but I'm sure we'll see the usual attempts.
Cheers,
Shafique