Palestinian Concessions Israel Rejected

Topic locked
  • Reply
Palestinian concessions Israel rejected Jan 24, 2011
Further proof about the truth about who is in reality standing in the way of peace in Palestine.

As shown in previous posts, the historic factual evidence is clear - ONLY the Palestinian side has made any concessions in regards to what it is legally entitled to. There has not been one, not one, concession made by the Israeli side. The spin and hype would suggest otherwise - but the truth has a way of coming out in the end.

The latest revelations just show that the Palestinians were prepared to make EVEN MORE concessions - to find a peace agreement. Israel spurned this offer and continues to try and blame the Palestinians. :roll:

'Palestinians agreed to cede nearly all Jewish areas of East Jerusalem'

Newly leaked documents reveal series of concessions made to Israel by PA negotiators; East Jerusalem offer was rejected as it didn't include settlements deeper in West Bank.
By Barak Ravid

Palestinian negotiators secretly agreed to concede almost all Jewish areas of East Jerusalem to Israel, the Guardian newspaper and Al-Jazeera TV reported on Saturday. As many as 1,600 Palestinian documents on peace talks with Israel, obtained by Al Jazeera TV and given to the Guardian, covering more than a decade of exchanges, provide a unique look into the breakdown of the peace process.

The biggest leak of confidential documents in the history of the conflict has revealed that Palestinian negotiators secretly agreed to accept Israel's annexation of all but one of the neighborhoods, Har Homa, built in East Jerusalem.

This was one in a series of concessions made to Israel by Palestinian negotiators in an effort to move closer to independent statehood. The documents give the impression of a weakened Palestinian Authority and growing desperation among its leaders because of impasses in talks and the growing strength of Hamas.

Israeli negotiators come across in the minutes as confident while U.S. politicians seem dismissive toward Palestinian representatives, according to the Guardian.

PA leadership may have difficulty explaining the revelations to a public not ready to offer the same concessions. The documents cover sensitive issues like the right of return of Palestinian refugees, the close cooperation between Israel and Palestinian Authority Security forces, land swaps in East Jerusalem and the West Bank, and of Israeli warnings to the PA of the imminent invasion of the Gaza Strip in 2008-09.

Al-Jazeera TV reported that the Palestinian Authority offered Israel all settlements in Jerusalem except Har Homa on June 15, 2008.

Saeb Erekat, the chief Palestinian negotiator, also proposed in an October 2009 meeting that Jerusalem's Old City be divided, ceding Israel control over the Jewish Quarter and part of the Armenian Quarter.

Further details reveal a Palestinian agreement to the return of only 10,000 Palestinian refugees into Israel, and that Erekat agreed to the Israeli demand of recognizing Israel as a Jewish state.

The documents also reveal that the Palestinian negotiators, in an effort to move forward on the hyper-sensitive issue of the holy sites in the Old City of Jerusalem, proposed a joint committee to administer the Temple Mount.

The offers were made in 2008, in the wake of the Annapolis conference, and were privately hailed by chief Palestinian negotiator Saeb Erekat as giving Israel "the biggest Yerushalayim [the Hebrew name for Jerusalem] in history."

Israeli leaders, backed by the U.S. government, said the offers were inadequate.

The leaked documents - drawn up by PA officials and lawyers working for the British-funded PLO negotiations support unit - include extensive verbatim transcripts of private meetings. Many were independently authenticated by the Guardian and corroborated by former participants in the talks and intelligence and diplomatic sources, the newspaper reported.

Cables from the U.S. consulate in Jerusalem and the embassy in Tel Aviv recently released by WikiLeaks were used to confirm some of the information.

According to the documents, in May 2008 Palestinian leaders agreed to allow Israel to annex Jewish neighborhoods in East Jerusalem.

Erekat told Israeli leaders in 2008 that "this is the first time in Palestinian-Israeli history in which such a suggestion is officially made."

Nonetheless, the offer was rejected out of hand by Israel because it did not include Ma'aleh Adumim, as well as Har Homa and Ariel, which is located deeper in the West Bank.

"We do not like this suggestion because it does not meet our demands," then Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni, told the Palestinians, "and probably it was not easy for you to think about it, but I really appreciate it."

http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/ne ... m-1.338785

shafique
Dubai Shadow Wolf
User avatar
Posts: 13442

  • Reply
No Partial Solution Jan 24, 2011
A breakthrough on the territorial issue might indeed encourage progress on the other core disputes. The two-state solution remains viable. That is the message sent out this weekend by the Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

http://www.jpost.com/Opinion/Op-EdContr ... ?id=204918

Hateful incitement against Israel, officially sanctioned by the Palestinian Authority, and an integral part of a Hamas’s very being, further exacerbates the situation, and underlines the widespread Israeli concern that the Palestinians have yet to internalize fundamental Jewish sovereign rights in this region. In addition, the Palestinian leadership has taken the Obama administration’s lead in insisting on a complete Israeli building freeze over the Green Line, including in blocs in the West Bank that would remain under Israeli control in any future deal and in consensus neighborhoods in east Jerusalem, as a precondition for a return to the negotiating table.
Bethsmum
UAE, Dubai Forums Lord of the posts
Posts: 6601
Location: JBR

  • Reply
Al-Jazeera declares war on the Palestinians Jan 24, 2011
[Mod: Merged this post into the existing thread - as covering the same issue]

A senior Palestinian Authority official in Ramallah strongly condemned Al- Jazeera TV network on Sunday for releasing hundreds of documents concerning the peace talks between Palestinians and Israelis.

“Al-Jazeera has declared war on the Palestinians,” the official told The Jerusalem Post. “This station serves the interests of the enemies of the Palestinians.”

Asked if the PA was now considering measures against Al-Jazeera, the official said he did not see how a TV station that “incites” against the Palestinians would be able to continue operating in the West Bank. However, he said that PA President Mahmoud Abbas, who is currently in Cairo, would decide on the PA’s response to the exposure of the documents in the coming hours.

http://www.jpost.com/Headlines/Article.aspx?id=204924

Where's the people of Palestine to watch their beheadings if they can't get Al-Jazeera? :shock:
Bethsmum
UAE, Dubai Forums Lord of the posts
Posts: 6601
Location: JBR

  • Reply
Re: Palestinian Concessions Israel Rejected Jan 24, 2011
I have to wonder whether BM actually read the snippets she cut and pasted above - but it is good to compare and contrast the evidence with the hype.

Note that the two posts don't actually contradict the facts made clear in the OP.

Perhaps third time is the charm BM? Want to try again?

Cheers,
Shafique
shafique
Dubai Shadow Wolf
User avatar
Posts: 13442

  • Reply
Re: Palestinian concessions Israel rejected Jan 24, 2011
Palestinians are NOT legally entitled to anything, let alone Jerusalem!
Flying Dutchman
Dubai Forums Zealot
Posts: 3792
Location: Dubai

  • Reply
Re: Palestinian Concessions Israel Rejected Jan 24, 2011
shafique wrote:I have to wonder whether BM actually read the snippets she cut and pasted above - but it is good to compare and contrast the evidence with the hype.

Note that the two posts don't actually contradict the facts made clear in the OP.

Perhaps third time is the charm BM? Want to try again?

Cheers,
Shafique


Seeing as my posts weren't made in reply to the OP it's hardly surprising that they don't contradict yours is it?
I'll keep trying Shaf :D
You know me I just keep talking and stuff comes out of my mouth.
Bethsmum
UAE, Dubai Forums Lord of the posts
Posts: 6601
Location: JBR

  • Reply
Re: Palestinian concessions Israel rejected Jan 25, 2011
Haaretz's Editorial today is entitled 'Israel still has a partner for peace'.

It refers to the leaks, and makes a rather chilling final point:

If Israel continues to prefer expanding the settlements to ensuring its status as a Jewish democratic state, we will lose the last Palestinian partner who could prevent its perpetuation as an isolated, condemned apartheid state.


http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/op ... e-1.339027

Cheers,
Shafique
shafique
Dubai Shadow Wolf
User avatar
Posts: 13442

  • Reply
Re: Palestinian concessions Israel rejected Jan 25, 2011
Palestinians are NOT legally entitled to anything, let alone Jerusalem!


Ohh I see, I wonder if moscow has been bombed becouse of this? it was only last week that they announced recognition of palestine..
http://www.haaretz.com/news/diplomacy-d ... e-1.337774

-- Tue Jan 25, 2011 3:45 pm --

Shafique the whole western capitalist block is in agreement that Palestinian arabs are not to live and to have any kind of administrative power and control in Israel..Abbas simply attempts to give huge concessions to Israels becouse he's forced, backed and protected by the western block, he is a puppet like the Mubarak of Egypt(sold themselves like the mojority of arab leaderships). Israel doesn't need to agree anything to what Abbas offers, It continues what it wants to do in rather quite slow, other times in speedy progress anyway..There is no one to stop them...
Not even the eastern block!...
Berrin
Dubai Forums Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 1390

posting in Dubai Politics TalkForum Rules

Return to Dubai Politics Talk