Chocoholic wrote:rudeboy wrote:neither do i! let me get that oil sorted out for you ladies
er did you not get that no one cares? Seems like you'll be oiling yourself up mate.
Cheerio.
-- Sat Nov 20, 2010 11:58 am --
Bethsmum wrote:Like I said Chocs if I've made you stop and think before throwing your weight about behind the scenes then my work is done. If you have anything to say to me in the future, say it on a public forum so we all know what we are dealing with. And if you can't handle it, then just don't send any more PMs that are unsolicited. Even you can understand that surely?
Clearly you miss the point! I'll address you off the forum if I want to - I'd rather that than tie up threads asking you to stop being such a drama queen - which clearly is the only reason you're around here. Once again, I'm amused that you only address me in regard to this, when others have PM'd you requesting that you stop acting the way you do on the forum.
As I previously said, reply to PM's - NOT start silly threads to get attention! Once again, others have also stated you should do this, yet once again you choose only to highlight me.
I honestly have no more patience for you BM, you come across as all high and mighty, yet you're probably the biggest culprit when it comes to trouble round here - this has been acknowledged ON and OFF to forum!
In my 19 years with my current employer I have attended many, many courses. One of the more boring was a course in plain speaking. At the time I thought it should have been renamed 'Dumbing Down For Simpletons'.
Clearly the time has come for me to use the tools I learned at that time.
I will address your post in terms I hope you may understand.
1 In the first part of your post you state you will continue to send me PMs if you want to. In the last part you say you have run out of patience. Which is it to be?
2 You say others have PMd me requesting I stop acting the way I do. The only other PM I have received of a negative nature was from Kanelli. That means one (1) not multiple (more than 1) people as you keep suggesting. Do you say this to justify yourself (make you feel better)? All my other PMs have been positive. I'm sure if this had been to the contrary (different), someone would have piped up by now.
3 Why do you keep shouting that I'm only highlighting you when others are as bad as you? Are you saying I'm trying to bully you? Who's playing the role of victim now?
4 I have no intention in replying to your PMs so you are wasting your time trying to intimidate (frighten) me behind the scenes.
5 I have been reliably informed that you are no longer a moderator on this forum. In this case how do you know what has been discussed off the forum? I take this statement to mean what you have discussed me with your friends by PM. Are we talking about a conspiricy (ganging up) here?
6 I don't have to be all that high and mighty to show you up. You're doing a fine job all by yourself.
-- Sat Nov 20, 2010 12:43 pm --
kanelli wrote:So now that we're on the 5th page, let's have a summary. BM posts a thread about a "threatening" PM she received but remains cryptic and mysterious for 5 pages. After beating around the bush, we finally discover that BM is upset about a PM that Chocs sent. BM still does not offer the proof of the threat, it was Chocs who offered up the content of the PM.
Chocs PM'ed Bethsmum:
'Seriously Lady, what is wrong with you? Other people are off topic, yet you only choose to pick on me!
I never made anything about ME, it's you who keeps doing that.
You're acting like a weird stalker - pack it up, because I really won't stand for it!'
As we can see, there is no threat of bodily harm, just a threat that Chocs will stand up for herself. There is little doubt anymore that BM is a major attention seeker. Now we can all keep that in mind when dealing with her. Perhaps this thread was useful after all?
Yes Kanelli, I have found it very useful and am very pleased to have hilighted yours and Chocs behaviour behind the scenes.