Natives For Natives

Topic locked
  • Reply
Natives for Natives Oct 14, 2010
The Tribe of Israelites and the Coushatta Native American Tribe of Lousiana: An Unlikely Friendship

The Coushatta went on to tell us that they felt a special bond with the Jewish people and Israelis, who, like the native Americans, have faced centuries of discrimination, relocation, and prejudice, all while feeling a strong sense of nationalism, and a desire to return to their historical homeland, a homeland to which they feel a strong spiritual connection. I am happy to say that just as the Jewish people returned to their historical homeland in 1948, the members of the Coushatta Tribe of Louisiana returned to theirs in 1972, receiving state recognition, followed by US federal recognition the following year, in 1973.

Flying Dutchman
Dubai Forums Zealot
Posts: 3792
Location: Dubai

  • Reply
Re: Natives For Natives Oct 14, 2010
I'm sure the Palestenians also feel the same way ;)
desertdudeshj
UAE, Dubai Forums Lord of the posts
User avatar
Posts: 6258

  • Reply
Re: Natives for Natives Oct 14, 2010
desertdudeshj wrote:I'm sure the Palestenians also feel the same way ;)


I would be interested to know DDS, what exactly would your definition of a Palestinian be?

p.s. I'm glad to see you've finally got rid of that silly picture signature!

:lol:
Dillon
Dubai Master of Thread Hijackers
Posts: 1563
Location: Marina

  • Reply
Re: Natives For Natives Oct 14, 2010
Whats with my sig ? Some people see it and some don't ? I have not edited ot deleted it and I always see it.

For this debate : It refers to all the people who owned or lived on the land now occupied and lived on by Israeli settlers after 1948.
desertdudeshj
UAE, Dubai Forums Lord of the posts
User avatar
Posts: 6258

  • Reply
Re: Natives for Natives Oct 14, 2010
Somebody living somewhere doesn't make that person a native IMO...

Referring to jews living within the pre-1967 armistice lines as settlers is ridiculous.
Flying Dutchman
Dubai Forums Zealot
Posts: 3792
Location: Dubai

  • Reply
Re: Natives For Natives Oct 14, 2010
I can't see your sig dd - I thought you'd upgraded the 4x4 with a stealth mode! ;)

Dillon, as for who are Palestinians - I'd use the simple definition of 'Inhabitants of Palestine' - and Palestine (as a country) is well defined in a British report to Parliament in 1930 which FD brought to our attention - the Hope Simpson report:

http://unispal.un.org/UNISPAL.NSF/0/E3E ... 19004F057C

Chapter 1 begins:
Palestine: The Country and the Climate.

Palestine is a small country generally stated to be about the size of Wales. There have been many estimates of its size and varied statements and arguments based thereon. The size of Palestine, and especially the cultivable area of the country, are so highly relevant to the matters under enquiry and to the deductions which must be made, that it is necessary to examine the more important of the statements and the estimates with some care.


And then goes out to meticulously describe the borders of the country (distinguishing it from Trans-Jordan, Lebanon, Syria, Egypt) and also covers the population of Palestine.

It really is quite simple.

Cheers,
Shafique
shafique
Dubai Shadow Wolf
User avatar
Posts: 13442

  • Reply
Re: Natives for Natives Oct 14, 2010
shafique wrote:I can't see your sig dd - I thought you'd upgraded the 4x4 with a stealth mode! ;)

Dillon, as for who are Palestinians - I'd use the simple definition of 'Inhabitants of Palestine' - and Palestine (as a country) is well defined in a British report to Parliament in 1930 which FD brought to our attention - the Hope Simpson report: ...

It really is quite simple.

Cheers,
Shafique


Thank you for your input Shaf, although I am more than aware of the history of events surrounding the creation of Palestine and subsequent events that have changed the recognised boundaries of the region, moreover, I was interested in DDS’s reasoning behind his previous post, ‘I'm sure the Palestenians also feel the same way’ and his response was as I expected.
Dillon
Dubai Master of Thread Hijackers
Posts: 1563
Location: Marina

  • Reply
Re: Natives for Natives Oct 14, 2010
Fascinating that it were primarily jews living in the Palestinian Mandate called themselves Palestinian, not the Arabs. :roll:
Flying Dutchman
Dubai Forums Zealot
Posts: 3792
Location: Dubai

  • Reply
Re: Natives For Natives Oct 14, 2010
Dillon, Cool - glad I could help.

Some people are still labouring under the misunderstanding that a country called Palestine never existed and are confused by the fanbois spin that a 'sovereign Palestine' never existed, and there were no borders etc.

The Palestinians deprived of their land (of whatever religion or race) would indeed 'feel the same way' as those in the OP.

FD - what was interesting to me in the 1930 report was the distinction between the Zionist settlements and those earlier Jewish settlements of PICA (Palestine Jewish Colonisation Association) founded by Rothschild in 1923 and whose settlers didn't have the apartheid policies of the Zionists (according to the report)

Indeed the report was prophetic:
It will be a matter of great regret if the friendly spirit which characterised the relations between the Jewish employer in the P.I.C.A. villages and his Arab employees, to which reference was already been made, were to disappear. Unless there is some change of spirit in the policy of the Zionist Organisation it seems inevitable that the General Federation of Jewish Labour, which dominates that policy, will succeed in extending its principles to all the Jewish colonies in Palestine.

The present position, precluding any employment of Arabs in the Zionist colonies, is undesirable, from the point of view both of justice and of the good government of the country.


At the time, Zionist colonies were in the minority - and in the majority PICA colonies, Palestinians got on well with the European colonists.

Cheers,
Shafique
shafique
Dubai Shadow Wolf
User avatar
Posts: 13442

  • Reply
Re: Natives for Natives Oct 14, 2010
Yes, the author's misunderstanding of the region is not surprising since he had only been sent to the region for a few months before this report.

They didn't have google back then, so it was rather easy for this guy to make very basic mistakes on what he was reporting on.
event horizon
UAE, Dubai Forums Lord of the posts
User avatar
Posts: 5503

  • Reply
Re: Natives For Natives Oct 14, 2010
Epic Fail.

Again.

Hope-Simpson was reporting on what he saw - not what he was taught in Bible Camp.

Cheers,
Shafique
shafique
Dubai Shadow Wolf
User avatar
Posts: 13442

  • Reply
Re: Natives for Natives Oct 15, 2010
Great, I'm sure many British citizens could provide their own report of what they see occurring in Britain today.

That doesn't mean our resident loon-in-chief will accept what many British are saying about their country or that all British people will agree with each when they report on what they are seeing.
event horizon
UAE, Dubai Forums Lord of the posts
User avatar
Posts: 5503

  • Reply
Re: Natives For Natives Oct 15, 2010
I think shaf himself is a brit, but xenophobes like BM don't consider him to be. tough noggins.

And stay grounded will ya. First it was Holland then US , then mexico and now UK. What other country would you will to scrape out of the bottom next in your ever fading arguments
desertdudeshj
UAE, Dubai Forums Lord of the posts
User avatar
Posts: 6258

  • Reply
Re: Natives For Natives Oct 15, 2010
Huh, found a new word to play with DDS? :lol:
Dillon
Dubai Master of Thread Hijackers
Posts: 1563
Location: Marina

  • Reply
Re: Natives For Natives Oct 15, 2010
No just an old troll

Hmm why doesn't it surprise me when you mention the name of one, the other is bound to follow ?

Must be those secret decoder rings !
desertdudeshj
UAE, Dubai Forums Lord of the posts
User avatar
Posts: 6258

  • Reply
Re: Natives For Natives Oct 15, 2010
LOL

eh doesn't like being confronted with facts does he?

Faced with an official report based on meticulous research and field work that exposes Israeli spin and loon fantasies - the reaction is that 'google wasn't around then'! LOL

SIR JOHN HOPE SIMPSON, C.I.E.


MY LORD

In accordance with Your Lordship's instructions I proceeded to Palestine in order to examine on the spot the questions of immigration, land settlement and development on which you desired that I should report.

I reached Jerusalem on 20th May, 1930, and at once commenced my enquiry. I was in constant consultation with the High Commissioner, who was thereafter kept in touch with the enquiry as it proceeded.

2. Much information has been obtained from official sources, and, in addition, both Arab and Jewish authorities and organisations have been consulted. Material has been obtained from the most varied sources, and has often been volunteered. In addition, as many tracts and villages of Palestine have been visited as the time available permitted. On Map No. 1, attached to the Report, both the tours and inspection of the villages visited are marked.*

3. In addition to local enquiry in Palestine itself a visit was paid to TransJordan, where the British Resident, LieutenantColonel C. H. F. Cox, C.M.G., D.S.O., very kindly arranged a tour throughout the northern part of the territory. His Highness the Emir of TransJordan also accorded to me the favour of an interview.


And remember, fanbois No2 - FD - brought our attention to this report.

But hey, nowadays eh is arguing that we have Guru Bob to tell us what the facts in Palestine really were - and we can dismiss the reports that PICA colonies did not have apartheid policies and the European Jewish colonists got on well with the native Palestinians, whilst the fewer Zionist colonies didn't - because of their apartheid policies.

Eventually, all the colonies were taken over by the Zionists (as defined in the report).

Facts are facts. Loon fantasies are loon fantasies.

Palestine is a clearly defined country with borders - a country under British rule, but a country no less.

Cheers,
Shafique
shafique
Dubai Shadow Wolf
User avatar
Posts: 13442

  • Reply
Re: Natives For Natives Oct 15, 2010
More relevant to this thread, the report speaks of a very large number of continious Arab illegal immigration into the Palestina Mandate because of the Zionist endeavours that brought economic properity. Most Arabs living in 1948 in the area cannot be counted as natives therefore. .
Hope Simpson also proposes a population exchange, like Cyprus one might say...
Flying Dutchman
Dubai Forums Zealot
Posts: 3792
Location: Dubai

  • Reply
Re: Natives For Natives Oct 15, 2010
No FD - you're confusing the PICA colonists who did bring economic good to their Palestinian neighbours with the Zionist colonists (as described by Hope Simpson) who deprived the natives of the use of their land (as Hope Simpson goes into detail).

The point about the immigration (and the report also has numbers of Palestinians by religious grouping in the 1920s and 1930s) just reinforces the point that Palestine was a clearly defined country with borders and hence also clearly defined 'natives' of the country - in other words 'Palestinians' is a clearly defined term (and does not relate to religion).

After all, Dillon asked what the definition of 'Palestinian' was - and hence I referred to this report. Let me say thank you again for bringing this to our attention.

Cheers,
Shafique
shafique
Dubai Shadow Wolf
User avatar
Posts: 13442

  • Reply
Re: Natives for Natives Oct 15, 2010
The PLO, the legal representative of the Palestinians, defines Palestinians as Arab. Which is very racist if you ask me.
Flying Dutchman
Dubai Forums Zealot
Posts: 3792
Location: Dubai

  • Reply
Re: Natives for Natives Oct 15, 2010
This is what the report says about the make up of Palestinians:
Census of 1922.The last census was taken in 1922, and showed the total population as being 757,182, of whom 590,890 were Mohammedans, 83,794 Jews and 82,498 Christians and others. The division between the town and agricultural population was as follows :

Town areas



Population in 1930.There has been a very considerable increase of the population since that census was taken. In Appendix 4 are given the figures of population year by year, taken from the records of the Department of Health of the Government. The totals for mid 1930 may be accepted as approximately the following :

Mohammedans 692,195
Jews 162,069
Christians and others 91,727
945,991


Now, the above shows that the Jewish population increased by 48% over the period, whilst the Muslim population by 15% and Christian by 10%. 100,000 Muslims vs 78,000 Jews over the 8 years - so taking into account natural population growth (children etc), there were more Jewish immigrants than Muslim - certainly the greatest % increase.

But this is just to show what the make up of Palestine was at the time - and who are the Palestinians.

Cheers,
Shafique
shafique
Dubai Shadow Wolf
User avatar
Posts: 13442

  • Reply
Re: Natives For Natives Oct 15, 2010
FD - I thought that the PLO have had/do have Jewish members in it's cabinet? I know Arafat had one - are you saying they had non-Palestinians serving in their cabinet? Hmm?

Anyway - the question posed by Dillon was who were Palestinians - the obvious answer is that Palestinians are the natives of Palestine. The fact that Hope-Simpson clearly describes the country, it's borders, population, agriculture etc shows that the obvious answer is as valid today as it was back then.

Cheers,
Shafique
shafique
Dubai Shadow Wolf
User avatar
Posts: 13442

  • Reply
Re: Natives For Natives Oct 15, 2010
shafique wrote:No FD - you're confusing the PICA colonists who did bring economic good to their Palestinian neighbours with the Zionist colonists (as described by Hope Simpson) who deprived the natives of the use of their land (as Hope Simpson goes into detail).

The point about the immigration (and the report also has numbers of Palestinians by religious grouping in the 1920s and 1930s) just reinforces the point that Palestine was a clearly defined country with borders and hence also clearly defined 'natives' of the country - in other words 'Palestinians' is a clearly defined term (and does not relate to religion).

After all, Dillon asked what the definition of 'Palestinian' was - and hence I referred to this report. Let me say thank you again for bringing this to our attention.

Cheers,
Shafique


You mean the 'Zionists' payed for the land and generously compensated the Pal-Arabs who had lived there?

When you get around to buying a home, are you going to have the previous owners live in the shed?

And yes, this is where the Hope-Simpson report comes under scrutiny:

http://www.zionism-israel.com/Palestine ... Report.htm

If you read, you may learn something yet, O Wise One.
event horizon
UAE, Dubai Forums Lord of the posts
User avatar
Posts: 5503

  • Reply
Re: Natives For Natives Oct 16, 2010
Again, missing the wood for the trees.

Hope-Simpson rightly points out that the Zionist colonies, with their apartheid policies, cause problems that the the European Jewish colonies of PICA did not. The issue is not the religion or nationality of the colonists (both are Jewish and European), but the apartheid policies.

That Zionists wish to re-write history is neither surprising or new. The Hope Simpson report says what it says.

Cheers,
Shafique
shafique
Dubai Shadow Wolf
User avatar
Posts: 13442

  • Reply
Re: Natives for Natives Oct 16, 2010
I am stil scratching my head over how the hiring policy of a private company can constitue 'apartheid'. Anything to continue the libel I guess, over the dead bodies of those that suffered from real apartheid.
Flying Dutchman
Dubai Forums Zealot
Posts: 3792
Location: Dubai

  • Reply
Re: Natives for Natives Oct 16, 2010
Dillon wrote:p.s. I'm glad to see you've finally got rid of that silly picture signature!

:lol:



SSSHSSSSSH!! He doesn't know it!!!!!
Bora Bora
Dubai OverLord
User avatar
Posts: 8411
Location: At the moment Dubai Forums

  • Reply
Re: Natives for Natives Oct 16, 2010
Flying Dutchman wrote:I am stil scratching my head over how the hiring policy of a private company can constitue 'apartheid'. Anything to continue the libel I guess, over the dead bodies of those that suffered from real apartheid.


Hope-Simpson is pretty explicit about the Zionist policies in his report and even quotes the Zionist colonists justifying their apartheid policies. The report says exactly why the apartheid policy is wrong - as it deprives the natives of use of and benefit from the land acquired by the Zionists - and he contrasts this with the policies of the then majority colonies set up by non-Zionist Jews from Europe.

Did you not read the report? After all, you're the one who brought it to our attention and I have quoted the relevant bits before (and given you the link to the whole report above too).

I hope you're not relying on loon websites for their interpretation of the report!

Cheers,
Shafique
shafique
Dubai Shadow Wolf
User avatar
Posts: 13442

  • Reply
Re: Natives for Natives Oct 17, 2010
And yet, Arab agricultural production rose throughout the 30's and 40's.
event horizon
UAE, Dubai Forums Lord of the posts
User avatar
Posts: 5503

  • Reply
Re: Natives For Natives Oct 17, 2010
Nice attempt at smoke and mirrors eh - but you're still missing the big thing point.

In 1930 the majority of the Jewish colonies were not Zionist Colonies with apartheid policies, but ones that worked with the native Palestinians and got on well with them. That collaboration worked and both prospered.

(And please note, I'm using 'Zionist' in the way that they described themselves and the way that Hope-Simpson documents in the report - it is not being used as derogative term, but as the name they called themselves before Israeli spin made it taboo to explicitly support apartheid policies in the name of zionism.

Hope-Simpson even documents the Zionists justifying their apartheid policy of excluding people based on religion in the report, and he rightly predicts that there will be trouble and strife if the Zionists get their way and apply their policies generally.

This is EXACTLY what happened when the PICA colonies were eventually taken over by the Zionist organisation. It wasn't rocket science to predict that the localised problems surrounding the minority of Zionist colonies would translate to a disaster if the colonies and apartheid policies became more widespread.

And this was in 1930!


And don't forget that the loon tactic of selective quoting is at play here as well - would you care to quote how much 'Arab' agricultural land has been taken away from native Palestinians since the 1940s? You don't like to publicise them stats do you, young one?

Cheers,
Shafique
shafique
Dubai Shadow Wolf
User avatar
Posts: 13442

  • Reply
Re: Natives For Natives Oct 17, 2010
shafique wrote:a disaster


Considering the libelous ranting on this forum about jews, uh sorry Zionists/Israel, I wouldn't call Israel a disaster, but a neccesity.

shafique wrote:And this was in 1930!


After already several Arab progroms against jews were executed.

shafique wrote: 'Arab' agricultural land has been taken away from native Palestinians since the 1940s?


I wouldnt call the absentee landlords who sold land to the jews as natives (obviously they didn't have much emotional attachment to the land) . In the 40s it were the jews who identified themselves as Palestinian. Only since 1967 did Palestinian Arab nationalism become a force
Flying Dutchman
Dubai Forums Zealot
Posts: 3792
Location: Dubai

  • Reply
Re: Natives for Natives Oct 17, 2010
a disaster


And yet the living conditions in Palestine were higher than her neighbors:

Zionism and its Impact:
Economic Performance and Standards of Living In Middle East Economies: 1932-1936 6
[Per Capita Income ] [Industrial Daily Wages] [Per Capita Cmptn Foodstuff] [Net Prdctvty Per Agr Wkr]
Egypt 12 NA 16.0 90.1
Syria 13 50-310 19.0 97.6
Iraq 10 40-60 13.8 93.2
Transjordan NA NA NA 90.1
Arab Palestinians 19 70-500 22.9 186.3

http://www.zionism-israel.com/impact_of_zionism.htm

Ah, loon logic strikes again - but the stats speak for themselves.

If you review the previous two links, you'll see that the Pal-Arab living conditions actually improved and were the highest in the region - but you wouldn't get that impression if you believe loon sensationalist reports!

But, why let facts get in the way of prejudice?
event horizon
UAE, Dubai Forums Lord of the posts
User avatar
Posts: 5503

posting in Dubai Politics TalkForum Rules

Return to Dubai Politics Talk