Your proof is based on absolutely wrong premises. Soviet Union alone defeated Germans. America launched their forces when situation with Germany was crystal clear. They did it to stop Soviet offensive to France and Italy, no more no less. That's why all those agreements were made to fix the status quo at that time. It wasn't friendly agreements. You think that both sides spent billions of dollars on arm race and US levied strict sanctions on SU to delude clever Berrin, and cover that they are a fake enemies in reality. It's rather intricating and costly delusion, isn't it?
Unfortunatly what I say is what we saw throughout the history..
If you are talking about the power of states than I would say this..
France and England competed with the Ottoman Khilafah for nearly three centuries until the mid-18th century. On the eve of WW1 Germany shifted the global balance of power, whilst France and Britain competed with it. After WW1 Britain emerged as the worlds power and France competed with it. Germany once again challenged Britain as the world’s superpower and only WW2 stopped German hegemony. The US emerged the world’s superpower after WW2 and was challenged by the Soviet Union for five decades until its collapse in 1990.
When it comes to America...
at the beginning of the 20th century the US had emerged as the most powerful capitalist economy in the world, but at this point it did not have a world role commensurate with its growing power. The fundamental imperialist clashes therefore took place in Europe both in 1914 and 1939 in the form of conflict between a British led alliance and a German led alliance. In the first instance the US intervened in 1917 to tip the balance in favour of the British led alliance. In the second instance, when the US came into the war in 1941, its power quickly made it the dominant force in the alliance.The result was that in 1945 it was in absolute and relative terms the most powerful economy in the world with, on some calculations, 50 percent of world manufacturing output. It now had a role of global leadership to match. This produced a degree of friction with Britain and France--powers in relative decline which still hankered after their old role. But this was minimised as a result of a more fundamental clash that now emerged with another former wartime ally in the anti-Hitler alliance, Russia.
But Since Germans were the allies of the Ottoman Empire, Russia too was against the Ottoman Empire' victory hence stood on the side of Britian and France and agreed on the secret Sykes Picot agreement in 1916 to divede the Ottoman Empire and beat the Germans...(agreement was signed 27th April 1917)
So in actual terms we can say that the interests of both American led allies and USSR' were meeting. Hence they made Yalta Conference and carved up the world nations in agreement..
And of course after countries were shared amongst themselves, competition for advancement started..
If one of them lacked strength, loosing power could fall apart from this magic created,since hegemony was on the suppressed and oppressed nations..Strong armies needed in this case, incase there were revoltions and ethnic rebellion groups within states..However Russian failure didn't arrive becouse Russians and Americans wanted to fight, rahter it was becouse communism as an economic model failed Russians to catch up with Capitalism..
You can defame the old order with two superpowers as much as you want but at that time "muslim" countries could chose and moneure between them in benefits of their own elites. Now everybody knows who is the king of the hill
Crikey you have no idea how the Ottoman khilafat was carved up by the British led allies...
Here enjoy reading...Don't forget to read the Russian role...
http://www.khilafat.org/newPages/Books/ ... troyed.pdf
But hey Chief I have a good read for you...Don't become hysterical like I do alright.
Theses on the Balkan War
http://www.isj1text.ble.org.uk/pubs/isj83/haynes.htm
