Palestinians Threaten To Adopt One-State Solution

Topic locked
  • Reply
Palestinians Threaten To Adopt One-State Solution Mar 04, 2010
Interesting development.

The Palestinian Authority has warned that it may abandon its support of the 1993 Oslo Accords, which outlines a two-state solution to the conflict with Israel, and instead pursue the creation of a binational state between the Jordan River and Mediterranean Sea, according to a document drafted by the PA's veteran chief negotiator.

The paper, entitled "The Political Situation in Light of Developments with the U.S. Administration and Israeli Government and Hamas's Continued Coup d'etat," was written by Saeb Erekat in December 2009.

It cites several methods of nonviolent resistance in light of the continued stagnation of the Mideast peace process. Among them are putting an end to security cooperation with Israel unless negotiations are resumed. This would mean the disbanding of the Palestinian security forces which have been trained by the U.S. security coordinator for the region, Gen. Keith Dayton, and potentially bolstering Hamas' role in maintaining order in the West Bank.
Advertisement
The document also raises the possibility of announcing the nullification of the Oslo Accords and even the dissolution of the Palestinian Authority. The chaos that would result from such a move, the document states, would force Israel to reassert military control over the entire the West Bank.

The third option proposed in the document - and possibly the most disconcerting from an Israeli perspective - is abandoning the pursuit of a two-state solution with Israel, and instead working toward a binational state that would exist on all the lands of historic Palestine.

Erekat told Haaretz that the third option is not his preferred course of action, but simply the default option based on what he called Israel's continued refusal to return to the negotiating table on the basis of terms agreed upon between Israel and the PA during the previous U.S. administration.

The 21-page document was sent in recent weeks to several leading policy scholars, the majority of whom work in Europe. In his paper, Erekat outlines the understandings reached during George W. Bush's administration, including the PA's willingness to consider compromising on its long-held insistence on the Right of Return.

According to the document's English translation, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas told then-Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert that his government would be willing to accept the return of 150,000 Palestinian refugees to Israel within the framework of a final-status agreement.

The Palestinians, Erekat wrote, agreed to the return of 15,000 refugees a year over 10 years. Thereafter, refugees would only be permitted to settle in Israel through an agreement between both sides. The document's original Arabic version does not state how many refugees will be allowed to return to land that is now defined as Israel.

Erekat describes Hamas as an obstacle to reaching an agreement with Israel. His document states that the Fatah leadership is pushing for next month's Arab League summit in Tripoli, Libya to demand that Hamas state whether it supports a final-status agreement. Such a statement, Erekat said, would determine whether Hamas stands within the Arab consensus, or is more in line with Iranian policy.


http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1152493.html

RobbyG
UAE, Dubai Forums Lord of the posts
Posts: 5927
Location: ---

  • Reply
Re: Palestinians Threaten To Adopt One-State Solution Mar 04, 2010
Well, Erekat makes a good case - whilst not ideal, if the Israelis refuse to sign up to the peace deals which give them 78% of the land and continue to build colonies on the 22% that would be left for Palestinians, the logical conclusion is to have a one-state solution.

But it does show that fact that it is the Palestinians that are making ALL the concessions and not the Israelis. Israel has made no concessions - ever - and has only grudgingly done less than required by international law (eg. pull out of Gaza but maintain a siege)

Just this week there were further announcements of colony building work in East Jerusalem involving the bulldozing of Muslim homes (and the excuse is - 'they are illegal'). FD and I agree with the international community that East Jerusalem was illegally annexed by Israel, and (are you reading eh) this therefore constitutes a war crime as EJ was captured in war.

That said, news this morning is that the Palestinians have a plan to resume peace talks despite Israel's continuing building of illegal colonies:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8547240.stm

Cheers,
Shafique
shafique
Dubai Shadow Wolf
User avatar
Posts: 13442

posting in Dubai Politics TalkForum Rules

Return to Dubai Politics Talk