For Berrin - Historical Inaccuracies In The Koran

Topic locked
  • Reply
Re: For berrin - historical inaccuracies in the Koran Feb 28, 2010
We're still waiting for your answers - you're not running away are you?

shafique wrote:Bump:
What you do after you've answered the two pertinent questions about your allegations is up to you.

Otherwise, it will appear it is a double case of 'AMNT' - all mouth, no trousers.

Cheers,
Shafique

shafique
Dubai Shadow Wolf
User avatar
Posts: 13442

  • Reply
Re: For berrin - historical inaccuracies in the Koran Feb 28, 2010
What don't you understand that there is no evidence that the Jews have taken Ezra to be the son of God?
event horizon
UAE, Dubai Forums Lord of the posts
User avatar
Posts: 5503

  • Reply
Re: For berrin - historical inaccuracies in the Koran Feb 28, 2010
I do understand that belief of yours.

However, it is your evasion of the two clear questions that leads me to say (again) you are 'All Mouth, No Trousers'.

Here are the points again (note the FAIL refers to your current status):


1. Provide one expert that disagrees with Newby that Ezra was a poster boy for the term 'ben elohim'. FAIL.
2. Provide the quotes from the Talmud which say only Jews go to heaven. FAIL


Cheers,
Shafique
shafique
Dubai Shadow Wolf
User avatar
Posts: 13442

posting in Philosophy and Religion ForumsForum Rules

Return to Philosophy and Religion Forums


cron