Asked and answered.
I've come across some obtuse posters before, but I think you take the cake.
What don't you understand, or better yet, what do you think is being asked in the quote below?
My only guess is that you are purposely misreading the quote so you do not have to actually attempt to answer it.
which NT passages are historically inaccurate based on the contemporary sources written at the time outside of the NT?
I seriously cannot imagine how someone with enough brain cells to turn on a computer can not apparently understand the written word.
The primary sources of the gospels are different from the canonised Bible
What? I'm asking for primary sources from the first century written by non-Christians, such as Roman statesmen and historians - when the events of the New Testament were said to have occurred.
As I said, I've come across some idiots/trolls, but you are the biggest so far.
This is particularly so when it comes to the differences between Jewish Christianity and Pauline Christianity.
Let me know when you get around to explaining the different beliefs amongst Jewish Christians, in particular the differences between the followers of Stephen and the later Pharisaic Christian converts.
Oh, and please stop pontificating on the New Testament and first century Jewish beliefs until you get around to answering this question.
