Dubai Forums Dubai Discussions Dubai Politics Talk

Red Chief wrote:China and Russia together lost 45-50 million people

Out of which only around 12 million were in army. The rest were citizens, slaughtered bare handed.

Speedhump wrote:

WhiteJade wrote:

Speedhump wrote:

RobbyG wrote:You two could be really good friends you know that

No he's finally shown his true xenophobic colours yet again. I forgive and forget for anyone once, but not twice.

How can you be so sure that you are the one to forgive rather than to be forgiven?

I thought you wanted to debate the Munich Agreement. if you do then it's your turn.

Debate moderator. And it's back to you...........you have 5 minutes to make your point.

Speedhump wrote:

Red Chief wrote:Every nation?
China and Russia together lost 45-50 million people, much more than the rest of the World combined... It's the fact, not so significant of course as "Miracle in Dunkirk".

You can see W.Jade that I was absolutelly right.

Haha, he has finally found an ally. Be happy together.

I told you the worm was slowly turning.

Speedhump wrote:
Oh, by the way Mr Factless, it's too late to start quoting figures now. You lost when you couldn't show that I 'didn't know' this fact.

There is some trace in the previous thread. You could've memorized some data from that thread to avoid getting into a mess now. Of couse if you have had some interest outside the Great Island.

Big brother is watching you...

It's a shame how his hatred is allowed to destroy so many threads. The moderators have no real interest in moderating. It's just 'one naughty word and we'll put it in Fight Club'.

Red Chief wrote:

Speedhump wrote:
Oh, by the way Mr Factless, it's too late to start quoting figures now. You lost when you couldn't show that I 'didn't know' this fact.

There is some trace in the previous thread. You could've memorize some data from that thread to avoid getting into a mess now. Of couse if you would've some interest outside the Great Island.

Big brother is watching you...

Pathetic factless mudslinging as usual, Mr. Factless.

Speedhump wrote:I don't attack, I defend. You are so stubborn you refuse to see that the attack is from the other side always, goading and prodding about the 'Englishness' that Trotsky hates so much. I have every right to stomp on him for his xenophobia. It doesn't mean I hate Russians. Just one of them.

I am nice, I know it, so do many people. I tip toilet attendants, I thank street workers, I give to charity. I hold doors open for men and women alike. But I dislike ignorant boorish people. The two are not mutually exclusive, can you really not understand that?

Can you plase stop commenting on my posts unless you have some factual statement to make, because you are rapidly turning into Trotsky's sock puppet. Thanks.

Will you be surprised that I tip washroom attendants, thank street workers and donate, too? People do this simply out of sympathy or gratitude. These aren't eloquent enough to prove that you are a nice person. What is your defination of being nice?

Do I have to remind you that this is a public forum? That I can comment on anything, with or without 'factual statement'. I'd also like to remind you that you are free not to respond to my factless comments.

I am no puppet of anyone unless I want to be. I give my nod to some other DFers ideas. That's it.

Speedhump wrote:It's a shame how his hatred is allowed to destroy so many threads. The moderators have no real interest in moderating. It's just 'one naughty word and we'll put it in Fight Club'.

I've never said that I hate you. Moreover I respect you as the honest man except your participation in the team-working.

WhiteJade wrote:

Speedhump wrote:I don't attack, I defend. You are so stubborn you refuse to see that the attack is from the other side always, goading and prodding about the 'Englishness' that Trotsky hates so much. I have every right to stomp on him for his xenophobia. It doesn't mean I hate Russians. Just one of them.

I am nice, I know it, so do many people. I tip toilet attendants, I thank street workers, I give to charity. I hold doors open for men and women alike. But I dislike ignorant boorish people. The two are not mutually exclusive, can you really not understand that?

Can you plase stop commenting on my posts unless you have some factual statement to make, because you are rapidly turning into Trotsky's sock puppet. Thanks.

Will you be surprised that I tip washroom attendants, thank street workers and donate, too? People do this simply out of sympathy or gratitude. These aren't eloquent enough to prove that you are a nice person. What is your defination of being nice?

Do I have to remind you that this is a public forum? That I can comment on anything, with or without 'factual statement'. I'd also like to remind you that you are free not to respond to my factless comments.

I am no puppet of anyone unless I want to be. I give my nod to some other DFers ideas. That's it.

Why should I be surprised if you tip washroom attendants? Please tell me where did that idea come from? I'm disappointed in you. I never claimed to be the only nice person here.

What I find very weird is that you do not consider that it is an expression of 'niceness'. People that treat manual workers as dirt are no less nice then? People that can feel sympathy and/or like to express grattude are 'nice' people. Empathising/sympathising (as opposed to expressing such emotions without feeling them, which is completely different) is clearly a trait of nice people. I find your reasoning strange. Of course, you are entitled to follow it.

Red Chief wrote:

Speedhump wrote:It's a shame how his hatred is allowed to destroy so many threads. The moderators have no real interest in moderating. It's just 'one naughty word and we'll put it in Fight Club'.

I've never said that I hate you. Moreover I respect you as the honest man except your participation in the team-working.

I understand you very well. When more than one person disagrees with you or feels you are being unreasonable, it's 'teamwork'. But you can comment to WhiteJade about me saying 'see?' and that's not. It's another example of your duplicity.

Thread trashed

Bora Bora wrote:

Speedhump wrote:

WhiteJade wrote:

Speedhump wrote:

RobbyG wrote:You two could be really good friends you know that

No he's finally shown his true xenophobic colours yet again. I forgive and forget for anyone once, but not twice.

How can you be so sure that you are the one to forgive rather than to be forgiven?

I thought you wanted to debate the Munich Agreement. if you do then it's your turn.

Debate moderator. And it's back to you...........you have 5 minutes to make your point.

Probably feverishly readng Wikipedia and google.answers to come back on this...

Actually It was a thread where W.Jade paid some attention on huge Chinese casualties in the WWII, right? I didn't mentioned you in my reply but indicated that her thread was out of the main stream discussions here.

You only confirmed it trashing here. Yes, I indicated on it to her, as a participant of the discussion. It had nothing in common with the team-work which led by that woman who didn't express her sencible opinion but only exhaled the anger in "supporting" you. Pay attention that I haven't say any rude word in the thread.

Speedhump wrote:Why should I be surprised if you tip washroom attendants? Please tell me where did that idea come from? I'm disappointed in you. I never claimed to be the only nice person here.

It's not about people who you think are as nice as you are, it's about people you hate, who you attacked or are attacking, why do you term them 'not nice'? What standard are you adopting? Is it because you think they don't tip, or express their gratitude or donate? See you are not judging under the same standard here.

Speedhump wrote:People that treat manual workers as dirt are no less nice then?

They are bad people in behaving like that. Being able to respect or to express gratitude is just being normal. Not being nice. Plus I think tipping is simply a consumption habit.

Speedhump wrote:Thread trashed

Don't worry. It is not your first time.

WhiteJade wrote:

Speedhump wrote:Thread trashed

Don't worry. It is not your first time.

is it yours?

Red Chief wrote:Actually It was a thread where W.Jade paid some attention on huge Chinese casualties in the WWII, right? I didn't mentioned you in my reply but indicated that her thread was out of the main stream discussions here.

You only confirmed it trashing here. Yes, I indicated on it to her, as a participant of the discussion. It had nothing in common with the team-work which led by that woman who didn't express her sencible opinion but only exhaled the anger in "supporting" you. Pay attention that I haven't say any rude word in the thread.

Your words below speak your true thoughts, where your words above do not, your mention of Brits and British three times shows very clearly to everyone here where your comments were aimed. You are being very obviously disingenuous by pretending that you wanted to discuss Chinese war casualties with a Chinese. Sad and obvious. Your added 'pepper' has exploded in your face.

He-he... You want too much from this forum. Some people here believe that Brits made the crucial contribution to the victory. Without them all World would speak German or Japanese now.

I'm not quite sure if they know anything about participation China in the war excluding occupations of Hong Kong and Singapore because they were British colonies at that time.

If you say that China lost more than Brits they won't believe you.

I'm sorry, Speedy, I forgot that you can understand only one sentence in a post (the first or the last one). I wrote about the team-working, not about avoiding mentioning Brits in the post. Of course I did mention.

I promise to write only one sentence per post in the future.

WhiteJade wrote:

Speedhump wrote:Why should I be surprised if you tip washroom attendants? Please tell me where did that idea come from? I'm disappointed in you. I never claimed to be the only nice person here.

It's not about people who you think are as nice as you are, it's about people you hate, who you attacked or are attacking, why do you term them 'not nice'? What standard are you adopting? Is it because you think they don't tip, or express their gratitude or donate? See you are not judging under the same standard here.

Speedhump wrote:People that treat manual workers as dirt are no less nice then?

They are bad people in behaving like that. Being able to respect or to express gratitude is just being normal. Not being nice. Plus I think tipping is simply a consumption habit.

I think rather than asking me so many questions it's time for you to tell us what you consider being 'nice'? You seem to consider that being 'nice' has to involve some exceptional behaviour, as just showing consideration to your fellow man is not 'nice' enough!. Please elaborate.

Speedhump wrote:

WhiteJade wrote:

Speedhump wrote:Why should I be surprised if you tip washroom attendants? Please tell me where did that idea come from? I'm disappointed in you. I never claimed to be the only nice person here.

It's not about people who you think are as nice as you are, it's about people you hate, who you attacked or are attacking, why do you term them 'not nice'? What standard are you adopting? Is it because you think they don't tip, or express their gratitude or donate? See you are not judging under the same standard here.

Speedhump wrote:People that treat manual workers as dirt are no less nice then?

They are bad people in behaving like that. Being able to respect or to express gratitude is just being normal. Not being nice. Plus I think tipping is simply a consumption habit.

I think rather than asking me so many questions it's time for you to tell us what you consider being 'nice'? You seem to consider that being 'nice' has to involve some exceptional behaviour, as just showing consideration to your fellow man is not 'nice' enough!. Please elaborate.

Teresa was nice.
You are normal.
Hitler was not nice.

I repeat my point.
Showing consideration to fellow man is just being normal.
So do you mean that it is more than normal to show fellow men consideration?

Speedhump wrote:It's a shame how his hatred is allowed to destroy so many threads. The moderators have no real interest in moderating. It's just 'one naughty word and we'll put it in Fight Club'.

RC clearly thinks there are only two opinions that count: his and those who agree with him. If you disagree with him and make a strong argument that he knows he can't win, slowly he trashes the thread.

Talk about calling the kettle black!!! Little Miss High-and-Mighty is slowly showing her ability to trash a thread or two. I'm sure we can look forward to more of the same. What annoys me is these two only see other people doing it!

The difference between RC and some others and me, along with other DFers, is that we will acknowledge trashing a thread, or as one DFer did, apologize that a thread could have been offensive to another member. We don't try to justify our actions or point fingers at others. I wish more people could owe up to it when they trash a thread or step over a line, and not try excuse themselves for doing it.

Bora Bora wrote:RC clearly thinks there are only two opinions that count: his and those who agree with him. If you disagree with him and make a strong argument that he knows he can't win, slowly he trashes the thread.

Talk about calling the kettle black!!! Little Miss High-and-Mighty is slowly showing her ability to trash a thread or two. I'm sure we can look forward to more of the same. What annoys me is these two only see other people doing it!

The difference between RC and some others and me, along with other DFers, is that we will acknowledge trashing a thread, or as one DFer did, apologize that a thread could have been offensive to another member. We don't try to justify our actions or point fingers at others. I wish more people could owe up to it when they trash a thread or step over a line, and not try excuse themselves for doing it.

Talking about trashing threads.
Some are experts, some are starters.
Know it's not so nice. Everybody knows.

By the way, you are keeping on trashing it by above post. Me by this post.

WhiteJade wrote:

Bora Bora wrote:RC clearly thinks there are only two opinions that count: his and those who agree with him. If you disagree with him and make a strong argument that he knows he can't win, slowly he trashes the thread.

Talk about calling the kettle black!!! Little Miss High-and-Mighty is slowly showing her ability to trash a thread or two. I'm sure we can look forward to more of the same. What annoys me is these two only see other people doing it!

The difference between RC and some others and me, along with other DFers, is that we will acknowledge trashing a thread, or as one DFer did, apologize that a thread could have been offensive to another member. We don't try to justify our actions or point fingers at others. I wish more people could owe up to it when they trash a thread or step over a line, and not try excuse themselves for doing it.

Talking about trashing threads.
Some are experts, some are starters.
Know it's not so nice. Everybody knows.

By the way, you are keeping on trashing it by above post. Me by this post.

Obviously you didn't fully read (nothing new there) my post.

Expert here. Starter working her way to becoming one!!

Bora Bora wrote:

WhiteJade wrote:

Bora Bora wrote:RC clearly thinks there are only two opinions that count: his and those who agree with him. If you disagree with him and make a strong argument that he knows he can't win, slowly he trashes the thread.

Talk about calling the kettle black!!! Little Miss High-and-Mighty is slowly showing her ability to trash a thread or two. I'm sure we can look forward to more of the same. What annoys me is these two only see other people doing it!

The difference between RC and some others and me, along with other DFers, is that we will acknowledge trashing a thread, or as one DFer did, apologize that a thread could have been offensive to another member. We don't try to justify our actions or point fingers at others. I wish more people could owe up to it when they trash a thread or step over a line, and not try excuse themselves for doing it.

Talking about trashing threads.
Some are experts, some are starters.
Know it's not so nice. Everybody knows.

By the way, you are keeping on trashing it by above post. Me by this post.

Obviously you didn't fully read (nothing new there) my post.

Expert here. Starter working her way to becoming one!!

I did fully read your 200-word essay there above.

I choose to respond to part of it, just like what you do.

If I were an expert of trashing threads
I'd never be proud of it.

I pray not to become one.

Wow, we have a commentator here. It's free of charge but frankly speaking I don't like any cheese for free. So much sarcasm, bashing (I'm sorry, witty banter) and misplaced comments. OMG she's judging... Brrr.... I'm anxious....(just joking).

There is definitely nobody as furious as a rejected woman in the World.

Red Chief wrote:

Speedhump wrote:It's a shame how his hatred is allowed to destroy so many threads. The moderators have no real interest in moderating. It's just 'one naughty word and we'll put it in Fight Club'.

I've never said that I hate you. Moreover I respect you as the honest man except your participation in the team-working.

Oy !

I'm not part of a team effort OK

anyways: Go SH Go SH

WhiteJade wrote:

Speedhump wrote:

WhiteJade wrote:

Speedhump wrote:Why should I be surprised if you tip washroom attendants? Please tell me where did that idea come from? I'm disappointed in you. I never claimed to be the only nice person here.

It's not about people who you think are as nice as you are, it's about people you hate, who you attacked or are attacking, why do you term them 'not nice'? What standard are you adopting? Is it because you think they don't tip, or express their gratitude or donate? See you are not judging under the same standard here.

Speedhump wrote:People that treat manual workers as dirt are no less nice then?

They are bad people in behaving like that. Being able to respect or to express gratitude is just being normal. Not being nice. Plus I think tipping is simply a consumption habit.

I think rather than asking me so many questions it's time for you to tell us what you consider being 'nice'? You seem to consider that being 'nice' has to involve some exceptional behaviour, as just showing consideration to your fellow man is not 'nice' enough!. Please elaborate.

Teresa was nice.
You are normal.
Hitler was not nice.

I repeat my point.
Showing consideration to fellow man is just being normal.
So do you mean that it is more than normal to show fellow men consideration?

Mother Theresa was not 'nice' she was selfless.
Hitler was not 'not nice' he was evil (probably).
Everyday people, like you and I, can be 'nice' or 'not nice'.

Nice is a term which is tepid, it describes small degrees of difference not major ones as you had thought.

I see the problem is in the matter of degree which you do not quite grasp. At least in English, and I am not criticising you for that.

Normal people are rude or polite, honest or dishonest, peaceful or hostile. And so on. Someone who exhibits enough 'favourable' factors will be described as 'nice'. It's as simple as that.

I cant add anything more, so I'll stop at this post.


Edit:spelling and grammar.

WhiteJade wrote:

Bora Bora wrote:

WhiteJade wrote:

Bora Bora wrote:RC clearly thinks there are only two opinions that count: his and those who agree with him. If you disagree with him and make a strong argument that he knows he can't win, slowly he trashes the thread.

Talk about calling the kettle black!!! Little Miss High-and-Mighty is slowly showing her ability to trash a thread or two. I'm sure we can look forward to more of the same. What annoys me is these two only see other people doing it!

The difference between RC and some others and me, along with other DFers, is that we will acknowledge trashing a thread, or as one DFer did, apologize that a thread could have been offensive to another member. We don't try to justify our actions or point fingers at others. I wish more people could owe up to it when they trash a thread or step over a line, and not try excuse themselves for doing it.

Talking about trashing threads.
Some are experts, some are starters.
Know it's not so nice. Everybody knows.

By the way, you are keeping on trashing it by above post. Me by this post.

Obviously you didn't fully read (nothing new there) my post.

Expert here. Starter working her way to becoming one!!

I did fully read your 200-word essay there above.

I choose to respond to part of it, just like what you do.

If I were an expert of trashing threads
I'd never be proud of it.

I pray not to become one.

You were on your way when you started trashing threads. This thread went downhill when you and your comrade started trashing it. Please take credit for that. You of so few words and thoughts.

Red Chief wrote:Wow, we have a commentator here. It's free of charge but frankly speaking I don't like any cheese for free. So much sarcasm, bashing (I'm sorry, witty banter) and misplaced comments. OMG she's judging... Brrr.... I'm anxious....(just joking).

There is definitely nobody as furious as a rejected woman in the World.

You do like free cheese. Or did they stop handing it out on the food line?

And once again, talking through your piehole. I guess that is what one can expect from a reject from society. Is sarcasm, bashing, and witty banter something you think you have the exclusive on?

Bora Bora wrote:This thread went downhill when you and your comrade started trashing it.

Me and my comrades, including you.

Bora Bora wrote:Please take credit for that.

I did and I still do. Again you are doing it by above post and me by this post. So why not just stop.

Bora Bora wrote:You of so few words and thoughts.

I assume you constantly make such comments just out of sheer good will.