uaekid wrote:1-there is not even 1 reason to make the retired locals drive a taxi for it's low income since their retirement salary is good enough.
2- there are no benefits , skills or knowledge to gain out of it.
3- culture wise , sons wont let their dads do it not bcz they are ashamed of it but the fact that we value them for what they did to us and the hard time they've been throw in the old days. we will not repay them buy letting them drive taxis, instead we as we live in big families support them one they retired by all means.
Now so you see robbyg. unlike you we have this thing called family value beside as a smart guy as you should know that as a manger when thinking of proposing such a policy should consider all the above before putting in on the table and embraces your self as a manger with a complete failed project from the beginning..
no unless anyone see any benefit of this policy please come forward and discuss it instead of making useless comments like your brains.
Reverse the question and ask yourself...Are Taxi Drivers required in society? Are they beneficial to the economy? What purpose do they serve?
The points you have put forth are valid. The income these drivers receive is too meager. Yet they survive. Maybe if some locals join the league, the authorities might implement minimum wages.
There is a lot of potential with locals.This can be an excellent tourism initiative. If the guys implementing this scheme have vision I'm fairly sure revenues will flow.
Besides we're going high tech. The new city Masdar will have magnetic roads. There's skill and knowledge for you.
I'm not gonna preach humility cos that's something I'm not. If driving a cab is below your dignity then fine.
Realistically I have to admit ur right. just to put in a local in an existing taxi does seem improbable. There's bound to be resistance.
But with a few modifications it may not seem like such a bad idea!