Feb 16, 2009
As an IT Security expert friend pointed out to me today, what they need here is a proper database, not another ID card. I'm an expat obviously and I already have lots of forms of ID. I have a passport, driver's license, labour card, health insurance card, etc.
Now the basis of everything you do in this country is the passport, because of there being so many expat workers. To get anything you need a passport copy, as I'm sure everyone is aware. Is this system fundamantally flawed? No idea, but it seems to work pretty well at the moment.
The idea of a national ID card works in principle, but it's effectiveness (over a passport copy) is only in the database that underlies it and the systems that use that database.
Based on the monumental muck-up that this ID procedure has turned into I have very little faith in the underlying database. If you can't a) organise the right number of staff to process them or b) realise that the system is flawed and take steps fix it earlier than 12 days before a panic-inducing deadline, then what use is the system itself going to offer?
Who is running it? How easy is it to access for banks/police etc? HOW MUCH BETTER IS IT THAN THE PASSPORT SYSTEMS?
PS: As for the security issues, the passport number could do this just as well. As I said, it all depends on the way it is used. Someone could already find out where I live, what my phone number is, where I work, what I drive, who I sponsor, what my health check results were etc, because I used the passport for all of those. It all depends on the database behind it. An additional ID card (obtained using a passport) is not going to change anything.
PPS: This obviously applies only to non-locals, but isn't there another form of ID that is used for locals already? It's not like the government doesn't know everything about them already.
- Captain Australia
- Dubai chat master
-
- Posts: 849
- Location: Radelaide