People, you all know of the case of the local who ran over the 52 year british woman last year. Well it now seems, (as seen in the papers of late) that his lawers are trying to get him off the hook by stating that "he only intended to scare the woman".
Quoting Gulf news:-
" "My client didn't have the time to plan for a murder. It's a case of accidental death and we dismiss the Public Prosecution's uncorroborated charges of premeditated murder and attempted murder," argued Bin Suwaidan. "He did not have any premeditated intentions as there was no acquaintance or relation between him and the victim and what happened was due to a provocative argument between U.A. and the husband& this is an accident like any other."
Well, intending to scare or not - fact is she died during his antics. And is a murder a murder only if it is planned? If there is a fight between two people and one dies, isn't the other guilty of murder?
It will be a real pity and poor example if this guy is let off. And I've seen in other countries - several times a ruling in one case sets the precedent for similar cases in the future. If this guy is let off, everyone will cite this case and get try to get off the hook.
Ref:
http://www.gulfnews.com/nation/Police_and_The_Courts/10278863.html