the message board for Dubai English speaking community
rudeboy wrote:shahrez no point in posting links like this. ppl in the west will believe what ever their politicans tell them to believe in. and yet they mock muslims for being brainwashed by the "islamic" extremists lol bunch on nutters.
by the way watch loose change a movie by an american whose eyes are open
benwj wrote:and the French bird who won an oscar just kissed her career goodbye.
spoonman wrote:benwj wrote:and the French bird who won an oscar just kissed her career goodbye.
what's the story? I've just read a babelfish translated news about this. wasnt a big deal. how's that gonna affect her career?
kanelli wrote:Yeah, damn those engineers for not constructing the world's largest skyscrapers to withstand airplane hits and full tanks worth of burning jet fuel for a couple of hours. Those of you who believe that the US government used demolition explosives to blow up the buildings are complete morons.
Chocoholic wrote:Well K, I hate to say it, but yes they were built to withstand plane impacts! It certainly wasn't the first time that a plane had crashed into a skyscraper.
Chocoholic wrote:Hey don't talk to Kanelli like that. She's a great person!
Chocoholic wrote:Well K, I hate to say it, but yes they were built to withstand plane impacts! It certainly wasn't the first time that a plane had crashed into a skyscraper.
dresden wrote:You are both correct, it was constructed to withstand a plane hit and an earthquake. No one fathomed that a 747 would be launched into it.
Also, the reason the building came down is because the fuel started to trickle down the building's frame (while on fire). This severly weakened the structure of the building and therefore it came down.
For anyone who knows anything about building construction, it came down how it was intended to do, not just fall over like a domino.
It looks like bombs were detonated, but thats physics.
When you crush a coke can, it bends to the sides, not the bottom. Now when it started to come down from the top, the pressure built up on the way down and caused the floors underneath to push 'outward' from the pressure.
arniegang wrote:Chocoholic wrote:Well K, I hate to say it, but yes they were built to withstand plane impacts! It certainly wasn't the first time that a plane had crashed into a skyscraper.
You are sorta correct Chocs.
Yes they were built to withstand a plane impact, but those were planes dating from the 60/70's.
The planes built in the 90's etc were much bigger with even bigger fuel capacities.
kanelli wrote:Any looney tune who believes that 911 was a US conspiracy can call me whatever they want, because they are out of their minds anyway.
shahrez wrote:
Slayer666 wrote:shahrez wrote:
This video has been removed
Del wrote:kanelli wrote:Any looney tune who believes that 911 was a US conspiracy can call me whatever they want, because they are out of their minds anyway.
Sad, narrow-minded, illiterate, never been anywhere, never done anything, never read anything little tick. Don't take me on. Go and get your teeth seen to.
Del wrote:I've only been here one week and you bore me already.
You can have the last word after this.
Dubai Knight wrote:Lee Harvey Oswald shooting John F Kennedy
Del wrote:Dubai Knight wrote:Lee Harvey Oswald shooting John F Kennedy
That never happened. Want to debate it?