I don't think the Immigration officers pick and choose whom to give 30 days and whom to give 60 days (from among the visitors of the 33 countries.) The law applies to all. But apparently what happened was that the new law, which came into effect on 29 July, did indeed reduce the visit duration to 30 days, but then it later was amended back to 60 days without any official announcements. Why? I don't know. Perhaps not to appear to be showing too much favoritism to certain nationalities. It also appears that those who got stamped 30 days after the amendment date (around mid August as reported by another member) were also allowed to stay 60 days on these visas. Why weren't they stamped 60 days in the first place? I am not sure. Maybe they were too slow to change the stamps, because now it seems more visitors are getting the 60 days stamp. I honestly don’t know!
I remember years ago that the UAE Immigration also used to stamp the 33-countries visitors for only 30 days but that visa was for sure valid for 60 days. Here is an excerpt from an article by Gulf News - which it says it was up date until June 8, 08:
"Citizens of the certain countries (listed in the next paragraph) can get a 30-day visit visa free of charge upon arrival, entitling them to stay for 60 days: Britain, France, Italy, Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, Luxembourg, Switzerland, Austria, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Portugal, Ireland, Greece, Cyprus, Finland, Malta, Spain, Monaco, Vatican, Iceland, Andorra, San Marino, Liechtenstein, United States, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, Brunei, Singapore, Malaysia and Hong Kong."
(The link:
http://www.gulfnews.com/uaessentials/re ... 67130.html )
So now if some people from the 33 privileged countries are getting a 30-day stamp and some are getting a 60-days stamp, it should mean a 60-day stay to all, because the law is not supposed to differentiate between the various nationalities of this category.
In any case, no one should take what is mentioned in this forum and in other forums as absolute facts, because no one can determine these rules with an absolute certainty in the absence of an official announcement from the DNRD. As such, the prudent thing to do is to always check with the DNRD.
However, I still urge anyone who can shed more light on this issue, to please let us know. Thanks!