shafique wrote:The hadith about breast feeding are fabrications/deliberate misquotes and have no bearing on the religion of Islam or the Quran.
of course that will be your answer - its the answer of anyone that turns a blind eye on the facts because they threaten what they believed in for the better part of their life. unfortunatly its invalid as the azhar's teachings and that is what previals - al azhar says it is in fact a valid and true hadith - any cleric that studied islam back to front would tell you the same - but they all say its widely agreed that this is not in line with current civilised customs hence making
shafique wrote:his life is a model for all to follow
very questionable.... i suggest that you discusss that with your local cleric when you go to the mosque today for your friday prayers..
shafique wrote:more than a billion people consider him the best human example that has exsisted.
thats charming - more than 5.5 billion pay him no regard.
this is exactly what i mean, when i say when you're presented with data like this, dont just turn a blind eye and call it fabrications - do your research and see what the truth is behind it... if you believed that muhammad is a model for you to live your life with and this surfaced would you blindly reject the claim or look into it? i know id be looking into it, especially if it made international news...
let alone marrying under aged girls, ordering people to leave their wives so he can marry them, etc etc etc - dont make me open a whole topic on muhammad's womanising history - because id probably make you self combust.
i never abadoned christianity shafique, i abandoned the thought of following religion, which are 2 different things. i still believe in jesus and that he and god are one in the same.
i believe in evolution which makes most religions rather questionable (or rather symbolic - not to be taken literarly - a collection of life lessons for guidance of society).. i believe that human DNA is a result a mutation of primate DNA through the introductions of certain natural occuring chemicals - in line with terrence mckenna's ideas, and many others. science tends to agree with that..
DNA mutations prevail when they prove fit enough to survive natural elements surrounding it - again science agrees with that.
i believe that through natural entheogenic experiences, true spirituality can be achieved - in line with many ancient civilisations, shamanistic teachings and rituals. and through personal experiences i believe that is far more accurate than any book can teach.
i believe that the 20th centuary has moved humans backwards in retardation rather than forward with the introduction of things that never used to exist, making us lazy, less productive, not utilising the brain that god gave us to its full extent and relying on computers to do that for us.
i broke free of that mould and explored my spirituality independant of anyone's teachings - my findings are far too profound for your brain to comprehend if you cant break out of the mould of what you blindly believe first.
i hope that answers your question - there's not much else i can explain because frankly i dont think you'll understand what im talking about if i get into it a little deeper.
shafique wrote:Do we at least agree that the majority of Copts who gave up Christianity became Muslims?
100% accurate - through oppression (the sword)