First, thanks HP, this is what i needed objective criticism, your first post was much more like a dissing, not really constructive, so thanks for this second one!
1. About layout:
The basic design (in .psd) was done by my irish friend (see credits at the info page), so i am not judging my own layout. I think its quite unique and serves its purposes. If i wanted it to look more professional then i would need to invest hundreads or even a few thousand dollars, as im very far from being a webdesigner. And to be honest this site is not about business, not about competition, its to show the developement via (mainly) construction photos.
2. Showing the site too early:
With this point a do agree, BUT
, the ones that are interested in architecture are going to check the site for the new photos, and i know it for sure. There is a nice community at Skyscraperscity (that is why i have the forum link to the current Burj topic), and these people want to see the photos and other information collectively, not in party in a forum that has 500 pages to go through to find single photos in single posts.
3. Competiton?:
If you read that article, you would realise its about a possible competitor for Burj, its about a MILE high skyscraper that might be built, altough i myself highly doubt it. I do think it is a relevant article. The facts page will show the other possible competitors as well (and to get back to your point, yes i should have started advertising later, although this is the first place i wrote about the site..).
4. Forum:
As i said that forum is the home for most of the people who come to my site (currently), and if everything goes ok, we will have our own forum.
5. Soz.dk:
You should realise that its a professional PHP site, my site is a plain html, and as i said earlier i would need a lot of money to make such site, and it wouldnt worth it FOR NOW. Just before Burj gets built in 2008 i might consider investing in it, but for now it wouldnt be a clever step imo.
Again, thanks for posting HP.