valkyrie wrote:What is your position on the politicaly controversial statements of your "holy text"?
Do you feel that homos.e.xuality is "sickening", or in the words of "Allah", "abomination"?
Do you think that women are "weaker" and "more easily fooled"?
Do you think that stoning is a just punnishment for "lewd thoughts"?
http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/quran/int/long.html
I haven't read the link, but here are my quick answers:
1. Yes, I believe the Quran's view on same gender relations - it is an abomination.
2. Women are physically weaker and are more easily coerced, yes I believe this to be the case. There are exceptions to this, but generally women do not compete in sports against men because of this biological fact. As to being intimidated/coerced - I do believe men have disproportionate power to influence women.
I don't think the word used is 'fooled' and the verses you are referring to are those which have women as witnesses and the requirement for a woman witness to have another woman as an aide (the other woman is not a witness, only the first lady is - the Quran is clear on this point). The philosophy is that it will be harder to intimidate two women than one.
3. There are no punishments for lewd thoughts in the Quran, certainly not stoning (However, if you post the verse which is being reported to have this punishment, I'll comment further). I know one misconception that the Quran says adultery should be punishable by stoning to death, when in actual fact the punishment is not death but lashing.
At the end of the day, I believe the claims of the Quran. It claims to be the literal word of God and is pure and guaranteed.
Some verses have a clear context (eg. the Quran says 'Do not pray' ..but it would be misleading to quote this in isolation when the full verse is 'Do not pray if you are not in control of your senses...etc' - so the context is important).
Cheers,
Shafique