Dubai Forums Dubai Discussions Dubai Politics Talk Philosophy and Religion Forums

North Korea tested a Nuke!


And Israel is outraged. Oh the hyprocrisy, the hypocrisy!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20061009/wl ... 1009131249

Why just pick out Israel's hypocrisy Freza? Did you not read about the condemnation of North Korea's test from other nuke-bearing countries like India, Pakistan, US and Russia etc.?

North Korea tested a Nuke!

and you are rejoicing this?

North Korea tested a Nuke!

and you are rejoicing bec of this?

freza wrote:North Korea tested a Nuke!


And Israel is outraged. Oh the hyprocrisy, the hypocrisy!

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20061009/wl ... 1009131249

if u see the links there in the photos u see ppl burnign effigies of kim an d his flag too..........sometime ago ppl accused y only muslim do this kind of act!

I dont know what the fuss is all about...So what if the country has nuclear power! Is it only a privelage for the few!!!..Countries most probably wont use them, but just knowing that a country has it would have its pyschological effect on anyone intending to attack that country.

What a Hypocrisy

Isreal which is threat to whole region is allowed to enslave and bully the middle east with WMD...but a country less threat to region like Iran is not allowed the same privilage...

United States the only country to use WMD on civilians..invade countries on bases of lies is allowed to have one and allowed to have say who can and who can't....what a hypocrisy..


So why can't North Korea,Iran or any country that feels threatened by the empire acquire the weapons to make empire think twice before they invade...afteralll Iraq would never have been invaded if they had the WMD.

North Korea broke the chains of slavery yesterday, I hope Iran breaks the chains of slavery very soon.

Oh give me a break No one should have nukes - period!

Sure, no one should have Nukes, but shouldn't the nuclear power nations lead by example

uae75 wrote:Sure, no one should have Nukes, but shouldn't the nuclear power nations lead by example

Yes indeed, let the Nuclear Powers lead by example and get rid of this menace to all mankind.

sage & onion wrote:

uae75 wrote:Sure, no one should have Nukes, but shouldn't the nuclear power nations lead by example

Yes indeed, let the Nuclear Powers lead by example and get rid of this menace to all mankind.

It is difficult to 'unlearn' what is already learned.



Knight

The Dear Leader exists, in perpetuity, in the hearts and souls of all North Korean people. Not only does the Dear Leader exist, he is one of only 4 human beings history who can be in two places simultaneously. Therefore, just this week he was fighting off the Imperialists and remaking the Lord of the Rings trilogy, which the Dear Leader, along with most world leaders, thought was entirely inadequate.

The Dear Leader is not as good as the Eternal Leader, but he's better than the Better Than Average Leader and a darn sight better than the Incompetent Leader.

Long Live The Socialist Revolution!
Long Live The Radiation and Starvation in North Korea!
Down with the so-called Peter Jackson and his aggression!

P.S. In case any comrades are wondering, the other 3 human beings, apart from the Dear Leader who can be in two places at the one time are the Eternal Leader, the guy who chooses the Dear Leader's sex slaves for him and Chuck Norris.

Dubai Knight wrote:

sage & onion wrote:

uae75 wrote:Sure, no one should have Nukes, but shouldn't the nuclear power nations lead by example

Yes indeed, let the Nuclear Powers lead by example and get rid of this menace to all mankind.

It is difficult to 'unlearn' what is already learned.



Knight

Poor Einstein cursed his involvement until the day he died, although he absolved himself of responsibility.

It's now 61 years since Hiroshima, and in 61 years a lot of knowledge has been acquired - documented - put on the internet.

The only really tough bit is getting the enriched uranium - but it obvioulsy isn't that tough.

^ian^ wrote:

Dubai Knight wrote:

sage & onion wrote:

uae75 wrote:Sure, no one should have Nukes, but shouldn't the nuclear power nations lead by example

Yes indeed, let the Nuclear Powers lead by example and get rid of this menace to all mankind.

It is difficult to 'unlearn' what is already learned.



Knight

Poor Einstein cursed his involvement until the day he died, although he absolved himself of responsibility.

It's now 61 years since Hiroshima, and in 61 years a lot of knowledge has been acquired - documented - put on the internet.

The only really tough bit is getting the enriched uranium - but it obvioulsy isn't that tough.

Ian buddy .it takes aALOT more than that

Its ok for the USA to have nukes and not ok for North Korea to have nukes.

The reason is because one leader is literally insane and one is not (although you may not like him). I will let you guess which is which.

It has very little to do with politics and a great deal to do with the fact that insane people should not have WMD.

boomtown wrote:Its ok for the USA to have nukes and not ok for North Korea to have nukes.

The reason is because one leader is literally insane and one is not (although you may not like him). I will let you guess which is which.

It has very little to do with politics and a great deal to do with the fact that insane people should not have WMD.

This made me laugh!! I think it's a joke...right?

So it's OK for the representative of the US: a blundering ex-drunk, idiot who illegally invaded a country for its oil - to possess nukes but not OK for the crazy, insane leader of N. Korea. Okaaaayyyy.

I'll take insane over a frustrated failed idiot any time.

uae75 wrote:Sure, no one should have Nukes, but shouldn't the nuclear power nations lead by example

Certainly a number of advanced capitalist countries are continuing to develop nuclear energy themselves, including the U.S. and especiallly France and Japan. It's a huge double standard, then, to set conditions on how Iran or North Korea can develop nuclear energy.

All these environmental considerations, etc., are things which Third World countries have to decide for themselves.

sage & onion wrote:Yes indeed, let the Nuclear Powers lead by example and get rid of this menace to all mankind.

Meanwhile, on planet Earth.....

Actually, it's a provision of the Non-Proliferation Treaty that the existing nuclear powers are supposed to negotiate mutual, total disarmament. But they don't even pretend to do so.

So the existing powers are all in violation of that treaty while pretending to enforce it on others.

Exactly Valkyrie, it is ing that those countries already possessing nuclear weapons are bitching about others developing then when they don't get rid of theirs in the first place. Also, at least the US is still continuing to develop nuclear weapon technologies - very ing.

Boomtown, you are seriously deluding yourself if you think that a nuke in North Korea or Iran's hands would be more frightening than the US having nukes. Don't forget, the US is the only country to have used their nukes in war. Who is to say they won't do it again?

kanelli wrote: Boomtown, you are seriously deluding yourself if you think that a nuke in North Korea or Iran's hands would be more frightening than the US having nukes. Don't forget, the US is the only country to have used their nukes in war. Who is to say they won't do it again?

Never know. It may become necessary one day.