A simple point of debate.
There's no secret that the Quran contains some pretty horrific descriptions of violence - genocide, enslavement of virgins, slaughtering of all living things etc.
Now, some Muslims argue that the Quran descriptions of violence were abrogated by the Quran teachings.
(However see this link for some interesting perspectives on this http://onislamicfascism.wordpress.com/2 ... the-quran/
)
But this does raise the question about the Jewish interpretation of the Quran's teachings. By definition they don't have the Quran to abrogate the verses advocating violence. They, as I understand, believe the Quran to be relevant and authentic - Allah's words.
The Quran is demonstrably more violent than the Bible (just look at the relative lists on many websites)
Does this mean that Judaism is more violent than Islam?
My view is that Islam is inherently violent. Only when verses are taken out of context and other verses are ignored in the Bible can it be argued that Christianity is a violent religion.
What do you think?
Cheers,
BM