shafique wrote:The fact that children are going to bed hungry, or worse dying, when there is a global surplus of food is not God's fault - but man's (at least in my opinion).
Man has a role in distributing food but the simple fact is there are too many people in parts of the world where water is scarce. Sure, (for example) Europe and the US can grow food (for now) but to physically ship enough food to starving parts of the world would probably take a substantial proportion all active ships in the world full-time, not to mention much of the food elements would simply rot in the process. And then there's the corruption element when it arrives, though that's definitely man's fault. I've mentioned before that the role of major religions in banning any sort of birth control in poor parts of the world is an issue and in this situation it clearly is, not God's fault per se (if he or she exists - let's not get in to that now!) but man's interpretation of "God's word" that causes the problem. Don't blame it on the logistics companies
On topic, I know some people put significant weight on "prayers being answered" but the evidence is so heavily stacked against this. A lot of research has been done (I don't have it to hand but I studied it as part of psychology at university) on things like do people with religion have greater survival rates from life-threatening illnesses. As you'd expect, the answer is no.
Quite simply, people ignore the thousands of times that it doesn't happen and then truly believe in intervention when something does happen. As a man who favours science, it's simply odds of coincidence. A person can devote their life to religion and die of a brain tumour, a non-believer can have the same ailment and survive. Why? Because there is a always a chance of recovery. When the doctors say someone has a 10% chance of recovery based on past mortality rates, the religious often take it as some sort of "miracle" if the person recovers, the scientist takes it as odds simply working their way through.
More interestingly from a psychological perspective, as above, when prayers aren't answered people do not blame God for it. They put it down to other factors, including in Christianity the oft-used "God moves in mysterious ways". So they are prepared to put total trust in God to make a situation better, but then apportion no blame when it doesn't happen. This type of behaviour is very rarely displayed in other aspects of life and is simply thought to be a reflection of the religious dogma instilled in people as they grow up. Religions always have a get out clause.
On the positive side, there are clear psychological benefits from believing that prayers have been answered, whether through coincidence or not, it gives the person a sense of empowerment and recognition. Whether that outweighs the long-term "dissatisfaction" of not having prayers answered is up for debate.