kanelli wrote:
And how do you KNOW that a person that any number of Western countries would approve of as leader of Iraq is a loser?
I think that democracy should be left to the people, but I can see why other countries take an interest in who gets into office and who doesn't. Maybe they are worried about religious fanatics getting in and destabalising the country with sectarian violence. Maybe they find relations better with more liberal politicians who operate on laws independent of religion?
Too bad Canada and Mexico couldn't secretly rig it so that Bush didn't get into office for a second term!
1) Because if the person in control was not an incompetant loser, then Iraq would be stable.
2) Democracy should be left to the people. Any control of the choice of the people is meddling and is NOT understandable. Also, what is so fundamentalist about Jaafari?? Still the Americans do not want him because he is too nationalistic and has spoken of the departure of US troops in the past.
3) Canada and Mexico are weak countries I am sorry to say. Their global weight is next to nil.