Note we are testing eh-oh's assertion that the New Testament contains no contradictions (a claim we've tested on the Quran in a separate thread).
Continuing with the theme on what Paul may or may not have said, let us examine two accounts in Acts concerning his conversion. One says those with him heard a voice, the other says they didn't:
Did those with Saul/Paul at his conversion hear a voice?
ACT 9:7 And the men which journeyed with him stood speechless, hearing a voice, but seeing no man.
ACT 22:9 And they that were with me saw indeed the light, and were afraid; but they heard not the voice of him that spake to me.
There's more where this came from:
http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/ ... tions.html
Now, to be fair, the best explanation for this I've read is that 'heard not the voice' could mean 'did not understand what was said' - but that would mean stretching the meaning of the Greek words, and would be to second guess all the translators who render 22.9 faithfully. But let's see what eh-oh has to say.
Cheers,
Shafique