http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/nort ... 930837.stm
wow I am abit suprised to see this as "an act of criminal barbarism" & "the work of dissident republicans".
Why arent these republicans called TERROISTS NOW? EY?
the message board for Dubai English speaking community
RobbyG wrote:Because they won't attack other nations and populations.
They fought an internal issue. Ever heard of IRA? That was a 'terrorist' wing of these Republicans. They laid down the weapons ten years ago...upon mutual agreements of peaceful negotiations as hatred caused more divides, something the islamic terrorists can take an example off one day...
These are dissidents. Call them terrorists if you like.
rudeboy wrote:RobbyG wrote:Because they won't attack other nations and populations.
They fought an internal issue. Ever heard of IRA? That was a 'terrorist' wing of these Republicans. They laid down the weapons ten years ago...upon mutual agreements of peaceful negotiations as hatred caused more divides, something the islamic terrorists can take an example off one day...
These are dissidents. Call them terrorists if you like.
Taliban attack americans and nato within their nation and population hmm still they are called "terroist".
They fought an internal issue hmmm taliban is in afghanistan and you have groups in Iraq, i dont see the same group fighting in turkey or spain. do you?
They laid down their weapons and their conditions were met. leave afghanistan and iraq am sure you wont get any war
They are TERROISTS mate. THEY kill ppl they blow up and they terroize PPL. A terroist is a terroist. live with it. doesnt matter if they have a seat in the house of commons. what matters is they kill ppl. Terroists.
rudeboy wrote:so i guess that means the irish dudes are terroist
rudeboy wrote:what is with you and pointing things
RobbyG wrote:rudeboy wrote:what is with you and pointing things
They say that the attack is the best defensive.