event horizon wrote:Berrin, Glenn Greenwald covers most of your arguments in the link I provided.
Since he explains his position on freedom of speech, which is mine as well, much better than I could ever explain my support for the freedom of speech, I advise you to read his article
According to your copy and paste piece Glenn Greenwald says that, if quran is seen to be most marginalized, repellent, provocative and has offensive ideas(like infidels claim) than it should be protected cause those are the views that are always targeted for suppression, as has been repeatedly seen in history, ideas that are despised and marginalized are often proven right, while ideas that enjoy the status of orthodoxy prove to be deeply erroneous or even evil......
Like that very much:)))So shall I just invite you to kiss the quran EH, now that we have the description of free speech according to your guru...you should bow down before him and his idea...
And don't forget EH he also says that those who endorse the notion that ideas(the quran) they hate should be forcibly suppressed inevitably — and deservedly — will have their own ideas eventually targeted by the same repressive instruments.
But I agree with you on one point tho, you as a disbeliever can indeed buy a quran as a book to be your private possesion and burn it in your privacy away from the eyes of other people. Now that would be a conduct that wouldn't incite violence amongst the public but stay as a matter between you and your creator to be sorted out later in the hereafter..