Sea Of Stupidity

Topic locked
  • Reply
Re: Sea Of Stupidity Jun 07, 2010
RobbyG wrote:Glad I'm still capable of blowing your valve off. :lol:


You are not capable for anything and you know that. You use this web site for your self-esteem only but more and more people here recognise what a nit you are.

Red Chief
Dubai forums GURU
User avatar
Posts: 2256

  • Reply
Re: Sea Of Stupidity Jun 07, 2010
Red Chief wrote:
RobbyG wrote:Glad I'm still capable of blowing your valve off. :lol:


You are not capable for anything and you know that. You use this web site for your self-esteem only but more and more people here recognise what a nit you are.


C'mon now, don't you worry about me fella. I'm doing very good actually. Not that you should care.

You should do another coffee with Bora. You fit eachother well. :twisted:
RobbyG
UAE, Dubai Forums Lord of the posts
Posts: 5927
Location: ---

  • Reply
Re: Sea Of Stupidity Jun 07, 2010
Red Chief wrote:
RobbyG wrote:Glad I'm still capable of blowing your valve off. :lol:


You are not capable for anything and you know that. You use this web site for your self-esteem only but more and more people here recognise what a nit you are.


LOL - a nit. hahahaha

Someone is taking such a whooping and refuses to get the message. I think I'll just sit back and have my cup of coffee and watch someone crash and burn.

:wav:
Bora Bora
Dubai OverLord
User avatar
Posts: 8411
Location: At the moment Dubai Forums

  • Reply
Re: Sea Of Stupidity Jun 07, 2010
Bora Bora wrote:
Red Chief wrote:
RobbyG wrote:Glad I'm still capable of blowing your valve off. :lol:


You are not capable for anything and you know that. You use this web site for your self-esteem only but more and more people here recognise what a nit you are.


LOL - a nit. hahahaha

:blob3:


There she is Chief! Your counterpart :mrgreen:

Stay-@-Home Tranny for 13 years now. Dares to talk about me enjoying a sabbatical in my younger years 8)
Ohh... the irony. :drunken:
RobbyG
UAE, Dubai Forums Lord of the posts
Posts: 5927
Location: ---

  • Reply
Re: Sea Of Stupidity Jun 07, 2010
I wish it was 13 years!! Whatever my situation it's been by choice.

I would hardly call what you are doing is being on a sabbatical. Let me help you out:

Sabbatical, Definition(s) of
“A sabbatical year is a prolonged hiatus, typically one year, in the career of an otherwise successful individual taken in order to fulfill some dream, e.g. writing a book or travelling extensively. Some universities and other institutional employers of scientists, physicians, and/or academics offer a paid sabbatical as an employee benefit (Wikepedia, 2005).”

You have been unemployed, not on a sabbatical, well beyond a year. What is it now, 2 years?
Successful individual - Not applicable
Writing a book or travelling extensively - Not applicable. (Living through a forum doesn't count as travelling. Racking up posts isn't considered "writing".)
Paid sabbatical - your unemployment checks ran out a long time ago.

I think you are.........errr............unemployed. SItting on your arse living a virtual life and counting rejection letters isn't a sabbatical. You've been unemployed for so long you probably fall under the category of "unemployable".

lol: :lol: :lol:
Bora Bora
Dubai OverLord
User avatar
Posts: 8411
Location: At the moment Dubai Forums

  • Reply
Re: Sea Of Stupidity Jun 07, 2010
I'm redefining the word 'sabbatical'. :lol:

Early career top guns that reflect back on their early lives while taking time to study (subject differs) a once-in-a-lifetime event since the Great Depression in an effort to understand the macro-economics involved and the role of fiat paper money in society.

Life is what YOU make of it. Not what granny hag thinks.... ;)

By choice, indeed!
RobbyG
UAE, Dubai Forums Lord of the posts
Posts: 5927
Location: ---

  • Reply
Re: Sea Of Stupidity Jun 07, 2010
RobbyG wrote:I'm redefining the word 'sabbatical'. :lol:

Early career top guns that reflect back on their early lives while taking time to study (subject differs) a once-in-a-lifetime event since the Great Depression in an effort to understand the macro-economics involved and the role of fiat paper money in society.

Life is what YOU make of it. Not what granny hag thinks.... ;)

By choice, indeed!


Rob, NO LIFE is not a life. You really need to GET a life. You can redefine it all you want, we all know you don't have a life.

Now run along and ask Mommy to make you dindin.
Bora Bora
Dubai OverLord
User avatar
Posts: 8411
Location: At the moment Dubai Forums

  • Reply
Israel Was Right by Leslie H. Gelb Jun 07, 2010
Always on the personal attacks if she can't win the argument. For someone who is in her late fifties, you sure don't portray much wisdom.

Anyway, back on topic:

Israel Was Right
by Leslie H. Gelb


Israeli commandos mishandled the situation but Israel was right to storm a ship bound for Gaza. Leslie H. Gelb argues why.

Israel had every right under international law to stop and board ships bound for the Gaza war zone late Sunday. Only knee-jerk left-wingers and the usual legion of poseurs around the world would dispute this. And it is pretty clear that this "humanitarian" flotilla headed for Gaza aimed to provoke a confrontation with Israel. Various representatives of the Free Gaza Movement, one of the main organizers of this deadly extravaganza, have let it slip throughout Monday that their intention was every bit as much "to break" Israel's blockade of Gaza as to deliver the relief goods.

The Israeli commandos who stormed the ship, where fighting erupted, badly mishandled the situation. But theirs was a mistake in pursuit of a legal goal, not a war crime. And as for calls for international investigations, they represent the usual hypocritical nonsense that will go nowhere. Except for those who routinely fool themselves about the judiciousness and effectiveness of action by the United Nations or the European Union, everyone understands their "investigations" will amount to nothing. Only the United States might do something useful—if the White House would only seize quickly the practical solution staring it in the face.

Israel has every right to protect itself under international law, including by blockades in international waters.
Regarding international law, blockades are quite legal. The United States and Britain were at war with Germany and Japan and blockaded them. I can't remember international lawyers saying those blockades were illegal—even though they took place on the high seas in international waters. There would be a general violation only if the hostile actions against the ships took place in waters under the jurisdiction of another sovereign state. Thus, for example, if the Israelis stopped the ships in Egyptian waters, that would have been a violation.

On a more tactical level, violations could occur if the force used to block and board were "disproportionate" to the circumstances. Those friendly to Gaza aboard the ship claim disproportionality, but this is not supported by the video available. In any event, and as a practical matter, no one is going to be able to prove exactly what happened on that ship Sunday night. Nonetheless, the overriding facts remain that Gazan leaders proclaim their goal is to destroy Israel, have tried for years to do so by missile attacks and terrorism, and that Israel has every right to protect itself under international law, including by blockades in international waters.

As for what the planners of this "humanitarian" flotilla had in mind, just listen to what the leaders of this enterprise have been saying. Greta Berlin, a leader of the pro-Palestinian Free Gaza Movement, told The New York Times that the Israeli claim that the people aboard the ship intended violence was preposterous. She argued that it was inconceivable that the civilian passengers on board would have been "waiting up to fire on the Israeli military, with all its might." By that keen logic, no Palestinian ever would have fired upon a militarily superior Israeli. We seem to know otherwise.

Or listen to Huwaida Arraf, one of the Free Gaza Movement leaders. She said on Sunday before the incident that the boats would steam forward to Gaza "until they either disable our boats or jump on board." How on earth did she expect that strategy would not lead to violence?

On what remains of the old Lehrer News Hour, Adam Shapiro, another Free Gaza guy, said Monday night that the flotilla aimed to break the blockade as well as deliver aid. Well, of course, no one asked him how he thought the blockade would be broken without violence. It couldn't—unless the flotilla escaped detection. And with six ships in the flotilla, that was highly unlikely.

So, the Free guys and gals achieved their real purpose—to provoke the Israelis, hope they did stupid things (which they did by boarding the ship with commandos who weren't prepared to do this job), and stirred international outrage.

Ah, the international outrage. Turks, French, all leaders large and small condemned Israel and called for international commissions. Ban Ki-Moon, the United Nations Secretary-General, said he was "shocked" by the attack. He condemned the violence, and added: "It is vital that there is a full investigation to determine exactly how this bloodshed took place. I believe Israel must urgently provide a full explanation."

Well, where was all that international outrage and demand for explanations and retribution when the North Koreans sunk a South Korean ship? Where was it when the Gazans attacked Israel? Where, when Afghan men flogged their women for not wearing veils? Where, when Saudi Arabia funds terrorists around the world? This international outrage is highly selective, isn't it? The one consolation is that the international community, such as it has become, doesn't get anything of value done.

Which puts matters in the American lap, as usual. There is a reasonable solution to this terrible dilemma: The Gazan people are in need of food and medicine, and Israel must protect itself against Gazan terrorists. President Obama should propose this simple arrangement: First, those wishing to bring humanitarian aid to Gaza agree to land aircraft, dock ships, and use land checkpoints all reasonably designated by Israel for inspection of contents. Second, Israel agrees to inspect cargoes within two to three days, and allow all humanitarian goods to proceed to Gaza immediately.

The United States surely has the power to accomplish this. It would prevent much needless killing and haggling—and phony posturing around the world. And if one or both sides rejected the deal, then that one, or the both of them, are on their own.

Leslie H. Gelb, a former New York Times columnist and senior government official, is author of Power Rules: How Common Sense Can Rescue American Foreign Policy (HarperCollins 2009), a book that shows how to think about and use power in the 21st century. He is president emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations.


http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and- ... lotilla/2/

As you can see, I'm not the only one who is arguing that Israel was in its right to engage and protect the blockade, even though the raid when amok.

Lets see what others make of this clear article. This discussion will separate the rational from the emotional fooks.

I say it wasn't piracy on high seas/international waters.
RobbyG
UAE, Dubai Forums Lord of the posts
Posts: 5927
Location: ---

  • Reply
Re: Israel Was Right by Leslie H. Gelb Jun 07, 2010
RobbyG wrote:Always on the personal attacks if she can't win the argument. For someone who is in her late fifties, you sure don't portray much wisdom, Bora.


Rob take a look at your previous posts where you constantly put down people. It seems that you attacking other peoples intellect must give you a boost. As RC said, its just a way for you to massage your self=esteem. Also take a look at the posts where people are sh*tting on your head. It appears that you are loosing your fan base.

I have no argument with you Rob. If you want to pull me into one of your posts, I will respond. If I thought you were able to argue on an adult level I might consider it. As for my age, well, that's open to a guess. What if I'm in my 30s, 40s, 50s, 60s?? Why do you seem to make an issue of age? Compared to everyone on the forum, you behave like a juvenile, yet you are 30 years old.

Your life slipped backwards to the point that you don't have one. You lost everything and ended up back home with mommy, which may account for your lack of maturity. Being a momma's boy can do that.
Bora Bora
Dubai OverLord
User avatar
Posts: 8411
Location: At the moment Dubai Forums

  • Reply
Re: Sea of Stupidity Jun 07, 2010
Another opinion:

Reactions to the Israeli seizure of the Gaza-bound flotilla have shared two traits: They have virtually all invoked international law, and they have virtually all been marked more by their rhetorical excess than their knowledge of international law.

(...)the rules of engagement at sea are among the few islands of stability. It therefore behooves us to have a look at the accepted law before going overboard on politicized interpretation.

Israel and Hamas are in a state of armed conflict.

Accordingly, the accusation of piracy is inapt, since under both customary law and Article 101 of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea that applies only to acts done for private gain. Israel’s acts must be analyzed in terms of the law of naval warfare.

A blockade of an enemy’s coast is an established military tactic. It is recognized as a means at the Security Council’s disposal under Article 42 of the UN Charter where collective action is authorized.

A naval blockade (...) is designed to stop ships from crossing a cordon separating the enemy’s coast from the high seas. It is therefore often enforced in what would otherwise be international waters approaching, but not necessarily inside, the territorial sea of the blockaded party.

Israel had no obligation to take the ships’ crew at their word as to the nature of the cargo

Ed Morgan is a professor of international law at the University of Toronto


Israel’s naval blockade pitches and rolls with the Law of the Sea
Flying Dutchman
Dubai Forums Zealot
Posts: 3792
Location: Dubai

  • Reply
Re: Sea Of Stupidity Jun 07, 2010
That FD contribution makes me eligible for a PhD degree in International Law, on the spot! ;)

I have feelin' for these issues... :albino:
RobbyG
UAE, Dubai Forums Lord of the posts
Posts: 5927
Location: ---

  • Reply
Re: Sea Of Stupidity Jun 07, 2010
I'm actually looking forward to seeing how this all plays out now.

What will be interesting is:

1. Who conducts the enquiry (Israel proposing Israelis choose the panelists - at least it is not proposing a military-only enqiry)
2. What the conclusions are (and arguments used)
3. Whether the Gaza siege is lifted in the meantime/as a result of the flotilla massacre.

For 3, Egypt is keeping its border open and the pressure on Israel to climb down from its beligerent stance on the collective punishment of Gazans is growing. The EU proposal that it will inspect ships and let aid through is a hard one to argue against, I would say.

Hamas in the meantime is the one who is looking like coming out stronger as the result of this. (And perversely, I think the more Israel instists it did nothing wrong/it was legal - sympathy for Gazans increase and Hamas wins even more).

Cheers,
Shafique
shafique
Dubai Shadow Wolf
User avatar
Posts: 13442

  • Reply
Re: Sea Of Stupidity Jun 07, 2010
So far only Turkey has discontinued all contracts, including military ones. It looks that others don't care too much about dead bodies. :wink:

Israel may be a son of a bitсh, but he's our son of a bitсh
Red Chief
Dubai forums GURU
User avatar
Posts: 2256

  • Reply
Re: Sea Of Stupidity Jun 07, 2010
Red Chief wrote:So far only Turkey has discontinued all contracts, including military ones. It looks that others don't care too much about dead bodies. :wink:

Israel may be a son of a bitсh, but he's our son of a bitсh


Not if you volunteer to run into a army blockade and start hitting commando's with sticks and knives. From that point onwards...you're on your own.

Glad you are with the 'good' guys, Chief :mrgreen: :drunken: :mrgreen:
RobbyG
UAE, Dubai Forums Lord of the posts
Posts: 5927
Location: ---

  • Reply
Re: Sea Of Stupidity Jun 08, 2010
Red Chief wrote:So far only Turkey has discontinued all contracts, including military ones. It looks that others don't care too much about dead bodies. :wink:

Israel may be a son of a bitсh, but he's our son of a bitсh


Flawed. Anonymous sources in Turkey's military have confirmed that sales for 183 billion dollars of Israeli drones this summer will go through.

Then again Turkey too benefits from Israeli expertise in an array of sectors from agriculture, electric grids, pharma and health-care research. All of this is going nowhere.

In-fact in a speech made at a university in Istanbul, Erdogen himself said those "Jews sit and invents things while the rest of the world depends on it"
Misery Called Life
Dubai Forums Zealot
User avatar
Posts: 3033

  • Reply
Re: Sea Of Stupidity Jun 08, 2010
shafique wrote:
shafique wrote:..and then cried about seeing terrorists with rifles before shooting 9 dead. ;)


BTW - what happened to this story about a rifle? Is this another case of early misinformation that vanishes under closer inspection?

Someone also should tell the US that the IHH has links to Al Qaeda as the Israelis allege - the US don't agree with Israel that it is a terrorist organistion (in fact, they seem to have done nothing more than President Carter and others have done - i.e. met with representatives of the elected party in Gaza):

From 2nd June at a US briefing:
...
QUESTION: So the U.S. does not believe it has connections to al-Qaida?
MR. CROWLEY: We cannot validate that.

http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/dpb/2010/06/142591.htm


Update: The IDF is back-pedalling on it's claims the IHH had links with Al Qaida (and doing it quietly, hoping no one will notice):

http://www.loonwatch.com/2010/06/israel ... ic-claims/
shafique
Dubai Shadow Wolf
User avatar
Posts: 13442

  • Reply
Re: Sea of Stupidity Jun 09, 2010
hurriyet.jpg


Reuters.jpg


The last pic was published by Reuters
Flying Dutchman
Dubai Forums Zealot
Posts: 3792
Location: Dubai

  • Reply
Re: Sea Of Stupidity Jun 09, 2010
Reuters acknowledged it made a mistake when it cropped the picture and that it wasn't intentional.

On the evidence, the Turkish press is less anti-Israel than Reuters - for they didn't crop the picture.

But, FD, what is hilarious is that these pictures were DELETED by the IDF and recovered in Turkey from the media cards.

Innocent cropping vs Outright censorship? Which is the greater evil here?

Cheers,
Shafique
shafique
Dubai Shadow Wolf
User avatar
Posts: 13442

  • Reply
Re: Sea of Stupidity Jun 09, 2010
Ooo common chaps this is laughing stock..
Have you ever seen ultimately trained commandoes boohoo and tussle on the floor..

Weren’t they supposed to hold on tight to the latest killer machines and bullets?

Israeli propaganda machine working very well on the net to tarnish,efface and outnumber the murder and cruelty scene they displayed by killing..

These pictures are ridiculous way to attempt to show the guilty as innocent..They do indeed know how to put play on the stage..To me these kind of pictures are a proof that on board the ship they also had a selective range of commandoes assigned for various tasks and purposes?

What big lies We are faced with…

Someone must ask colonel Amir Perets how they train “shayetet 13” specialized fight commando forces… Your wodden sticks and iron bars just meant to be mosquitues bites to these killer machines..
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shayetet_13
http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/s ... mir-perets
Berrin
Dubai Forums Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 1390

  • Reply
Re: Sea of Stupidity Jun 09, 2010
An interview with an Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood parlement member, who participating in the flotilla, made quite some Israel bashers angry. He claimed "the flotilla participants overtook three Israeli commandos and snatched their weapons from them" and "Israel said that it was faced with armed men on the ship and that it was thus forced to clash with them. The parliament member said that he and those with him took over the commando's weapon and denied that he and those with him were civilians who had not committed violent acts."

Egyptain media responed that this is he PR gift to Israel.

Israel bashers seem to be in a dilemma. On the hand they want to be proud of the tough Flotilla members overtaking and ambushing the IDF, on the other hand they want to look their innocent selves. Same story with the picture editting of Reuters.
Flying Dutchman
Dubai Forums Zealot
Posts: 3792
Location: Dubai

  • Reply
Re: Sea of Stupidity Jun 09, 2010
Oooo waaoww, israelies handed over their killer machines willingly? wooww why?
In the hope that volunteers would kill a few israelies and that the score would be equal?
israel=9 - flotilla=9

Everbody is guilty, nobody is guilty? No winner-no looser... Rascals.. but I am no dummy..
Berrin
Dubai Forums Veteran
User avatar
Posts: 1390

  • Reply
Re: Sea Of Stupidity Jun 09, 2010
FD, you appear confused. The IDF initially (perhaps still do?) claim that they didn't expect any resistance. Yet, they launched a commando raid at night rather than just sail up as they did with the Rachel Corrie.

May I suggest you re-read this article and then come back and tell us with a straight face that you do indeed believe the Israeli spin that the humanitarians came 'tooled up' looking to defeat the Israelis.

dubai-politics-talk/this-one-worth-reading-for-the-laughs-t42121.html


Israel and its supporters claim that Viva Palestina, made up of people who collect the donated food, cement and items for providing basic amenities such as toilets, and transport them to Gaza, wanted the violence all along. Because presumably they must have been thinking "Hezbollah couldn't beat them, but that's because unlike us they didn't have a ballcock and several boxes of plum tomatoes".


;)
shafique
Dubai Shadow Wolf
User avatar
Posts: 13442

  • Reply
Re: Sea of Stupidity Jun 09, 2010
Flying Dutchman wrote:An interview with an Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood parlement member, who participating in the flotilla, made quite some Israel bashers angry. He claimed "the flotilla participants overtook three Israeli commandos and snatched their weapons from them" and "Israel said that it was faced with armed men on the ship and that it was thus forced to clash with them. The parliament member said that he and those with him took over the commando's weapon and denied that he and those with him were civilians who had not committed violent acts."

Egyptain media responed that this is he PR gift to Israel.

Israel bashers seem to be in a dilemma. On the hand they want to be proud of the tough Flotilla members overtaking and ambushing the IDF, on the other hand they want to look their innocent selves. Same story with the picture editting of Reuters.


Please provide the link to support the "interview".
Bora Bora
Dubai OverLord
User avatar
Posts: 8411
Location: At the moment Dubai Forums

  • Reply
Re: Sea of Stupidity Jun 10, 2010
http://arabtube.tv/viewVideo.php?video_id=9645&title=&vpkey=

He starts talking arounf 7:20

He tried to deliver aid to Gaza yesterday also via Rafah. Guess what? Egyptians didn't allow it. :idea:
Flying Dutchman
Dubai Forums Zealot
Posts: 3792
Location: Dubai

  • Reply
Re: Sea Of Stupidity Jun 10, 2010
I'm impressed that you understand Arabic FD.

The best I could do was find the quote from Ynet:
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340 ... 89,00.html

So, as far as I can tell, we have an Egyptian politician who is admitting that he and others over-powered the 3 commandos, and we have an Egyptian journalist criticising him for stating this fact.

I'm a bit lost here - has anyone denied that the three commandos were disarmed and captured?

Has the politician, Mohamed Beltagy, suddenly transformed from a politician to a armed/trained terrorist?

Where's the beef?

Cheers,
Shafique
shafique
Dubai Shadow Wolf
User avatar
Posts: 13442

  • Reply
Re: Sea of Stupidity Jun 10, 2010
Given that Obama is now stepping in line with the rest of the world on Gaza, hasn't the flotilla actually succeeding in achieving it's main objective of breaking the siege?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/8731073.stm

It certainly seems to have done more than the UN, Desmond Tutu, Pres Carter etc etc all combined!

Whilst Israel seeks to console itself with an internal enquiry and construct an alternative reality in which it did nothing wrong, Gaza's medieval siege is being eased day by day. The irony is that Hamas is emerging stronger as a result - go figure!

Cheers,
Shafique
shafique
Dubai Shadow Wolf
User avatar
Posts: 13442

  • Reply
Re: Sea of Stupidity Jun 10, 2010
Obama wants to take a lemon and make lemonade.

"The situation in Gaza is unsustainable," [did he just realize this?] Obama said as he met with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas in the Oval Office. He said the attention of the world is on the problem because of the "tragedy" of the Israeli raid that killed nine people trying to bring in supplies.

"So if we can get a new conceptual framework ... it seems to me that we should be able to take what has been a tragedy and turn it into an opportunity to create a situation where lives in Gaza are actually, directly improved."

Chocolate anyone? I love Oren's response at the bottom of page 1.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/37595441/ns ... tn_africa/
Bora Bora
Dubai OverLord
User avatar
Posts: 8411
Location: At the moment Dubai Forums

  • Reply
Re: Sea Of Stupidity Jun 10, 2010
Haaretz Editorial today is to the point:

Hamas 1, Netanyahu 0

The Gaza-bound aid flotilla achieved its goal - the hermetic blockade of Gaza has been ripped wide open and Israel has been the target of massive international criticism and demands for an investigation.
http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/op ... 0-1.295266
shafique
Dubai Shadow Wolf
User avatar
Posts: 13442

  • Reply
Re: Sea of Stupidity Jun 11, 2010
Any news already whether Hamas allowed the aid into the Gaza strip? Last thing I heard, Hamas still refuses the aid.
Flying Dutchman
Dubai Forums Zealot
Posts: 3792
Location: Dubai

  • Reply
Re: Sea Of Stupidity Jun 11, 2010
I don't know. The last time I read about it, they were refusing the aid until all the aid activists held by Israel had been released. Seems like they didn't want their aid deliverers to be held hostage.

The main aim of the flotilla was to break the siege though, and as Haaretz says, Hamas has come out of this the winner.

But with Egypt's border opening and Israel very graciously now allowing Israeli made cookies in, the cracks in the siege are widening and Bibi is looking increasingly foolish!

cheers,
Shafique
shafique
Dubai Shadow Wolf
User avatar
Posts: 13442

posting in Dubai Politics TalkForum Rules

Return to Dubai Politics Talk