shafique wrote: However, I can't fail to feel that you are trying to divert attention from the questions posed above about the UN resolution 478 and Israel's illegal activities in East Jerusalem.
478 is non-binding. It is impossible to break non-binding rulings/resolutions.
shafique wrote:but the Palestinians should also be free to choose which parts of Palestine to allow Israel to annex.
And what do you consider Palestine?
shafique wrote:The Arab Peace Plan is the solution - a two state solution, recognition of Israel, normal immigration/emigration, just solution to refugee issue.
I agree, the Arab peace plan is a promising initiave, however too vague on a key issue, refugees. It needs negotiation. At the moment the PA refuses to negotiate
shafique wrote:I really don't understand why you want more rights for Jewish residents than non-Jewish residents
Where did you get that idea?
shafique wrote:I don't get your equation of immigration rules with anti-semitism or the destruction of Israel?
I really doubt you mean this. A full right of return for the Arabs mean the end of Israel.
shafique wrote:Olmert's map is interesting - and I couldn't see in the Haaretz stories on the subject where Abbas says what the Palestinian objections are.
The map is awfull. I quoted Abbas' objection in my previous post.
shafique wrote:offering the Palestinians Israeli land in return for keeping some of the colonies on Palestinian land.
This is indeed the way it will look like. Remember before 1967 Israel had armistice lines, no definite borders. The final borders need negotiation. Some land within the green line will be included in a future Pali state, some land conquered by Israel because of a defensive war against Arab agression will be included in Israel.
shafique wrote:It is a shame that his successors don't want to continue with this line of reasoning.
Where did you get this idea? Actually Lieberman wants the whole Arab traingle in the Galilee to be ruled by the PA.