Glad to see you're not so grumpy any more - and if it makes you feel happier to imagine I'm not laughing at eh squirming, so be it.
I take it you haven't heard of homicide by Bridge either then!
Cheers,
Shafique
the message board for Dubai English speaking community
Sorry, but do I support bridge collapses if I call one an act of God?shafique wrote:You say that Israelites killing babies and women and enslaving virgins is an 'act of god' - because the Bible says God told them to kill and enslave.
I don't recall God asking anyone to kill using a Bridge - do you?
Cheers,
Shafique
Sorry, but I'm responding to your logic.shafique wrote:He's equating a group of men killing women and babies (with swords) and enslavement of virgins after the slaughter, with a bridge collapsing. Perhaps you can explain the logic to me - it seems he's equating a slaughter and enslavement with an accident? All he had to do was say he condemns the war crime.
shafique wrote:(As an aside.. I guess by now you've revised your original beliefs that it was mostly non-white British people rioting now the facts of those arrested and wanted are in).
Muslim 031, 5932: [At the battle of Uhud] Mohammed said to Saed: Shoot an arrow, may my mother and father be taken as ransom for you. Saed drew an arrow and shot a featherless arrow at the Meccan's side and he fell down and his private parts were exposed. I saw Mohammed's front teeth when he laughed.
Umayya: 'Now I had bound my prisoner's thumbs with my bowÂstring, and when Mohammed looked at him he laughed so that one could see his back teeth. He asked my news and when I told him how I had killed a Kafir by pushing my bow through his eye into his brain, he blessed me.' [1]
Flying Dutchman wrote:Homicide by bridge sounds terrible and should be condemned with the strongest words!
shafique wrote:the war crime.
Bethsmum wrote:Hey Shafique!
A couple of pages ago you mentioned the UK riots. I did my research and came up with some results.
I found that 90 of the first 100 faces on the mug shot website were black (well varying shades of, but not white!)
I even gave you a link to the website where I did my research.
You haven't commented on my findings! Why was that?
The fact remains that eh is the only one here (unless FD/BM want to join him) who has justified the killing of women and babies
shafique wrote:(As an aside.. I guess by now you've revised your original beliefs that it was mostly non-white British people rioting now the facts of those arrested and wanted are in).
shafique wrote: you rightly worked out that I had no intention of commenting on uglymugs or whatever you were on about...
shafique wrote:Perhaps FD can help you with your belief that 90% of the rioters were black.
You are the only poster here who has come out and justified the killing of women and children, including babies, and the enslavement of virgins.
On the other hand, your logic is telling me that if I support one incident because I call it an act of God that must mean I support all incidents I call an act of God.
Yes, eh - you are the only poster here who has justifed the actual killing of babies and women, and the enslavement of virgins.
If there is a Muslim poster here who shares your extreme view and has posted a similar justification for the slaughter of women and children
I don't consider them sub-human at all and don't justify