I think it is a good point to take a deep breath and review what has transpired in this thread. It is quite interesting on a number of levels.
The intial post is about a US survey which shows Islamophobia is more likely amongst Americans who hold anti-semitic views. No one really seems to dispute this survey's results.
DK and I had a brief discussion on how Buddhism doesn't seem to invoke predjudice or have external violent tendencies, but it was noted that there it is not immune from some violence - albeit over a small theological point and in an isolated area of Buddhism.
DK seems to be the one who put the cat amongst the pigeons by posting about a conversation he had in Saudi Arabia where it was said that issues were not with Jews, but with Israel.
Then the fireworks started in response to my writing:
There is now a concerted campaign to fudge the issue and insist that the Palestinian issue is more complicated than it actually is.
FD and I had a long discussion on Palestinian diplomatic moves to declare independence and formally crystalise what is in UN resolutions about Israel.
In that thread, some facts were brought out which I listed
1. Israel has made no concessions in the peace negotiations - it has been all the Palestinians
2. Israel broke the truce and lied about why it was bombing Gaza and killing civilians (by saying Hamas broke the truce)
3. Israel have 78% of the land and Palestinians are settling for 22% - but Israel is reluctant to settle for this and seems to want more - specfically building more illegal colonies in the 22% that is not Israel.
4. Israel is unequivocably breaking international law in East Jerusalem by annexing it.
5. B'tselem say Israel in East Jerusalem is discriminating against the non-Israeli residents.
dubai-politics-talk/palestine-push-for-independence-t39413-270.html#p325228These are facts that aren't disputed. (Rather excuses are always given for why Israel should be allowed to break international law etc - it's the 'mooslims who hate us' is a recurring theme)
FD took exception to this and stated
Flying Dutchman wrote:Well, Shafique, those are your ´facts´. Don´t include me. Your ´facts´ stems from an intense hatred. Like how Auschwitz is also not a fact for you. But lets not reiterate arguments made in another thread that are slightly off topic here.
So 1. I have 'intense hatred. and 2. Aushchwitz is apparently not a fact for me.
And to remove all doubt, FD stated:
Flying Dutchman wrote:You never miss a change to defend and agree with holocaust deniers when they deny the holocaust: whether it is from Iran, Hamas or a neo-nazi website.
I've asked for any evidence for this allegation (I called it a slur) and we have been led on a merry dance about Salutes, some alleged calculations which disprove death camps and requests to analyse Berrin's quotes. (But no evidence that I could see)
And in the last post above we have FD's summary:
So according Shafique, a nazi salute and/or denying the holocaust is not anti-semitic.
Hmmm - would that mean I'm not an anti-semite because I don't do a Nazi salute and don't deny the Holocaust? But what could the 'intense hatred' FD said above be referring to?
For me thats how to spot a anti-semite.
Thanks for sharing.
Berrin comments that jews are responsible for the holocaust (and nazi's have nothing to do with it) is also not considered anti-semitic. Nice!
Again, I must have slept through where I said this -
Anyway, FD - please let me know if my summary of the sequence is off - and particularly let me know if you have actually provided any evidence for your allegations/slurs against me?
Cheers,
Shafique