Thanks FD - a great example of selective quoting and ignoring evidence.
Let's compare the truth with the loon spin, again:
First Hroub:
Hroub has analysed in detail three key documents published by Hamas since the charter: its autumn 2005 election manifesto, Change and Reform; its March 2006 draft programme for a government of national unity; and the government programme presented by the Palestinian prime minister, Ismail Haniyeh, to the new parliament on 27 March 2006. Hroub points out that Hamas is now a different organisation from the Hamas that took shape at the beginning of the first intifada in December 1987.
Now what Hamas says, in their own voice:
But it should be made clear that neither Hamas nor the Palestinian government in Gaza denies the Nazi Holocaust. The Holocaust was not only a crime against humanity but one of the most abhorrent crimes in modern history. We condemn it as we condemn every abuse of humanity and all forms of discrimination on the basis of religion, race, gender or nationality.
So, categorically not anti-Semitic (whether political, religious etc )
The plight of our people is not the product of a religious conflict between us and the Jews in Palestine or anywhere else: the aims and positions of today's Hamas have been repeatedly spelled out by its leadership, for example in Hamas's 2006 programme for government. The conflict is of a purely political nature: it is between a people who have come under occupation and an oppressive occupying power.
At least we now seem to agree that the conflict is purely political.
Pretty clear, categoric and anti-loon!
First quote above shows they aren't anti-semitic (just anti-Zionist) and secondly, the conflict is therefore political. It is legitimate to resist an occupation. Mandela did it, for example.
Cheers,
Shafique