The Daily Mail is known for sensationalist reporting and is a right wing paper.
Look beyond the hype and it is all about race.
Housing benefit is given to people in work too (and IIRC a high proportion of those receiving it are working), and in this case the house is owned by the council.
The benefits they are receiving, according to the article, does not include unemployment benefit - so they are in work, it seems. The article states that the actual benefits aren't known and it appears to be just a piece about the neighbours not being happy that this family of 10 has been housed by the council and is paying the rent that the council set.
The family have been living there for a year, and the only complaints seem to be that the council is charging them a low rent, and that they seem to be earning enough to buy a TV and carpets, and that some other family members were seen driving in a new car. WTF??
And the article says they had been living in temporary accommodation 'for years' prior to getting allocated this house.
Given that asylum seekers can't work, it is clear that these people are in the country legally and were on the waiting list until over a year ago. One wonders whether we'd have the same article if the family happened to be a white family of 10 who worked and were similarly eligible for income support and housing. I doubt it.
A fellow inhabitant, Mohamed, 55, said: 'We were on the council waiting list. All adults in the home are on housing benefit and income support.
...
The family are understood to pay the council just over £1,000 a month in rent, yet if the property were rented on the private market it could command up to £6,000 a month....
It is unclear when the Somali family, who have been living in the house for about a year, came to the UK and whether they arrived as asylum seekers. The precise breakdown of the benefits they receive is not known.
i.e. typical DM hype and rant.
Cheers,
Shafique