Dubai Forums Dubai Discussions Dubai Politics Talk

Thanks for your opinion. It is noted.

Should you come across the full transcript, please post.

Did you have a look at the two articles regarding Salafi satellite tv etc in Egypt?


Cheers,
Shafique

It says al rahma tv is one of the most popular due to star power of its main preachers.

I therefore ask again, how can we be sure that this isn't another example of Memri's tactics:

And I've already explained that as a website, "cherry-picking" examples of "Islamophobia" is exactly what LoonWatch does.

So why do you get worked up about a statement which said "jews are cancerous" surely anybody who is cancerous should be either treated or be let to die off ... Where is your western freedom of speech? if a westerner gives similar statments against muslims it is considered to be freedom of expression but if it is done by the muslims it is called hatred and racism..Is that so? bloody double standards..

Anyone who is rational and has a peace of mind, could actually work out that "the race" or "the physical human body" is not enough to be cancerous and evil..what makes them cancerous and deadly is their opinion behind their ideology and their characteristics and traits that are in full support of them.. And unfortunatly zionist jews hold those characteristics and the ideology to back up their actions towards the rest of humanity...

And anyone who damn posseses the ideology which is described in this Torah tafsir called talmud is indeed cancerous in the society, in my mind something should be done towards these kind of evil people...

http://www.revisionisthistory.org/talmudtruth.html



.

if a westerner gives similar statments against muslims it is considered to be freedom of expression but if it is done by the muslims it is called hatred and racism..Is that so? bloody double standards..

Racist and hate speech is not incompatible with free speech.

Anyone who would call Muslims cancerous and in need of wiping out would be targeted by LoonWatch and numerous other mad watch websites and, of course, statements from individuals not calling Muslims cancerous be ignored.

Funny how that works.

so racism and hate speech is compatible with western free speech.. There you go.. There is one reason why FD should never have made a fuss about the speech of this muslim clearic...since he is lover of FoS...

Loonwatch is not set out to protect nations such as Arabs, Turks, Iranians, Malaysians... But it is set out to to fight islamofobia...

Hence if anyone says Muslims are cancerous becouse of their religious ideology then they will jump in of course to correct whatever is misunderstood or wrongly presented..

Who said you can't condemn hate speech even if you believe in free speech?

Perhaps it's your misunderstanding that is making you confused.

Under free speech, I can oppose what someone says but not their right to say it.

Loonwatch is not set out to protect nations such as Arabs, Turks, Iranians, Malaysians... But it is set out to to fight islamofobia...

So LW is run similarly to Memri, except Memri is the opposite side of the same coin as LoonWatch. Memri exposes (rather than fights) Christianophobia and Antisemitism in the Muslim world whereas LW engages in not only highlighting alleged "Islamophobia" but also in smear attacks and name calling.

Yet LW is the "good" website but Memri is "hate propaganda" for following a less confrontational and provocative pattern as LW and other Far Left, Mad Watch, police blotter websites.

Curious how that works out in the minds of this forum's brain trust.

Berrin wrote:There is one reason why FD should never have made a fuss about the speech of this muslim clearic...since he is lover of FoS...

The ability to oppose and expose widespread Jew hatred and genocidal speech in the Muslim world is FoS. I am not sure what your point is. To be able to oppose somebody's speech is FoS.

during 1940s a population of approximately 75 Million Germans probably thought the same what the OP is all about!