I'll stick to the original challenge and count converts who commit terrorist acts because of their beliefs in their scripture. We've established that the NLFT are one of these groups
Actually, if you've bothered to read, the entire point of contention is over this issue. I have asked you numerous times to show where in the NLFT's manifesto does it call for the establishment of a Christian theocracy as some poorly researched BBC articles have claimed.
You have ignored these repeated requests and instead decided to conclude from inaccurate reports that the NLFT is a Christian fundamentalist movement - this is in spite of the facts which show the group seeks to establish a workers state and has non-Christian members within its senior leadership.
Additionally, I've stated a number of times that there is *no* evidence that the majority of the group's membership are indeed converts from Hinduism to Christianity. I've repeated myself that your habits of selective quoting led me to believe that the original Christian population of Tripura was at only 10% of its current population since the mid-eighties as opposed to what the articles says when I re-read it - that the Christian population grew by 90%.
Unsurprisingly, you're not concerned with facts or accuracy, but quick results to show that you're 'right' all along. This is similar to your second grader knowledge of various other topics but continued insistence that you know what you're talking about, see your posts repeatedly claiming Jesus was the speaker in the epistle of James, your mistaken belief that Paul persuaded Peter to convert Cornelius, copy/pasting articles where the author uses false quotes (or the discussion you had with Muslim posters in which they repeatedly complained over the same tactics in debate that you are employing here).
What is even worse, is that you do not seem bothered with posting inaccurate information. To you, it would be better to be believed (or to convince yourself) than to seek out the correct information if it potentially opposes/disproves your point of view - such as your quaint belief in rejecting evolution because the theory of evolution - humans evolving from lower primates - goes against what the Koran says how humans were created and relying on simplistic explanations that convinces yourself on why humans probably didn't really evolve from anything.
If you have any actual evidence, as opposed to your MO of trolling (which you were quite successful at alienating the members of a sub-forum you were the moderator of and received numerous complaints by said members against you), then use this evidence to support your belief of why most of members of the NLFT are converts to Christianity and, indeed, that most of these converts are carrying out acts of violence to set up a Christian theocracy - an unsupported claim.
I suspect, however, that you will continue to troll. I have encountered dumb members before on the internet, but you are truly the dumbest of the dumb. Furthermore, it's not as if I'm the only one to have complained over your posting tactics. Other members, including the Muslim members on the Yahoo forum you trolled there, have made the exact *same* complaints against you.
Here, I'll provide a history lesson of how other members, Muslims no less, complained about your exact same penchant of ignoring posts, steamrolling over points made and putting words into other peoples mouths:
Mr. Shafique, I am really surprised that you have once more repeated
this unproven and unsupported claim, which we have already seen to be
without any merit. I have already provided six lengthy replies, while
you have not supplied any supported reply. Please note that, while
this strategy may be a good way to waste time, it is quite
unproductive and against our stated policy.
Unfortunately, you have not considered any of the facts and arguments
provided by us. An honest, rational, and productive discussion
demands that both sides pay close attention to what is said and
provide proof in support of their position. It is easy, Mr. Shafique,
to simply state things, while ignoring the counter arguments and all
the evidence provided. However, those who resort to such strategies
are only being dishonest with themselves and are not considerate of
others on the forum.
Please keep this in mind and revisit our prior postings carefully.
In addition, kindly avoid attributing things to others which are
clearly against what they have stated. Such postings will be seen
as obvious attempts to waste time and will be rejected. I hope
you agree that a believer is supposed to produce evidence and show
respect for the truth and honest communication.
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/qadianism/message/667Ten years later, and you're still dumb as ever. Although, I admit that quoting the last paragraph reminded me of when you falsely claimed I quoted Hans Kung to address the alleged contradictions in the New Testament.
Strangely enough, after I had shown you to be a liar, you still did not explain yourself or take back your lie.