One of the interesting tactics of an anti-White racist is to project their racist beliefs on to others. In this forum, for example, racial epithets against whites were dropped commonly for some time (though have stopped after two racist moderators were exposed after one accused a third member of 'racism').
After doing a quick search on anti-White racism, I came across an article from Britain where the same acceptance of anti-White racism and all the projection that it entails by anti-White racists is apparent.
The article cites a published study by Britain's IRR (Institute for Race Relations) that finds some 42 killings supposedly based on race were carried out in Britain since 1999. Although the perpetrators could have been any race, the article and media spun the killings as white on colored crimes.
As the author points out, "...he does not belong in a list whose clear purpose is to portray racist murder as a crime against coloured people. That leaves 41."
The author further whittles the list down to a total of 36 so-called race based murders, leaving out a total of six murders where the perpetrators were non-white, "[d]espite the question mark over these six deaths, however, we decided for the purposes of our study to accept their classification as racially motivated, and then use the same IRR assessment criteria in our parallel study of white victims of racial murder."
So, we have a final list of thirty-six killings by whites on non-whites that were allegedly based on race. The motivation for a number of these killings as being race motivated is doubtful; they include drug addicts who happen to kill a person of color, an Asian man whose killer the police determined was acting out in self defense and other murders with no apparent race based motive and where the race sensitive police were unable to find racial hatred as the reason for the killing.
However, instead of shortening the list even more, the author instead uses the same set of criteria used by the IRR to determine white on non-white killings to create his own parallel list of non-white on white killings.
The only problem is that the authorities in Britain do not generally recognize speech or behavior against whites by non-Whites (or Muslims against non-Muslims) that the would for in attacks of whites on non-whites - calling the victims 'kaffir' or 'English slag' or 'white-trash' would not be considered as evidence to determine if the attack were race based for non-white perpetrators as an obscure tattoo could be if the perpetrator were white.
The author must many times therefore go on media accounts of these attacks and points out that until more recent years - around 2001 with the increased trend of media going to the internet - does he see a sharp uptick of anti-White killings in Britain.
His conclusions of anti-White murders are jaw-dropping. His survey find that during the same period where the IRR found 36 non-whites killed by whites in alleged 'race based' attacks, there were 142 white victims of similar race based attacks by non-whites:
Despite these difficulties, the list of white victims of racist murder which we were able to compile for the same period as the IRR report runs to 142 dead. The individual, family and community tragedies involved in each one of the brief accounts of racially motivated (defined according to Institute for Race Relations practice) murder are beyond comprehension. The statistics for racial murder in Britain in 2006 can, by contrast, be readily understood and are best expressed as a ratio…and it’s almost 4:1, i.e. nearly four whites slain for every non-white killed.
The grotesque racial disparity involved in these figures can be understood by considering the percentage of ethnic minority groups within the population as a whole.
In 2006, when the parallel studies ended, BME communities made up approximately 9% of the population. Further back towards 1999, of course, this proportion would have been smaller, but for simplicity of maths and in order to avoid any possibility of being accused of trying to massage the statistics, we will use this maximum figure even though it actually distorts the figures slightly against our argument that race murder in modern Britain is overwhelmingly a BME crime.
...
The crime ratio should be equal to the population ratio. So non-whites should be committing approximately 9% of any given crime. However, out of a total of 178 killings classified as ‘racial murders’ according to the IRR criteria, 142 saw white victims slain by BME assailants, with 36 involving the liberal stereotype white racist/coloured victim.
BME killers targeting white victims were thus responsible for a staggering 79% of traceable racist homicides in the UK between 1999 and 2006. This is an over-representation by a factor of more than thirty four.
Thus non-whites were, in the period 1999 - 2006, forty times more likely to be committing racial murders against white people on a per capita basis than the other way round. White victims are over-represented to the same degree.
While the author would be the first to admit that certainly not all of these killings were race based, his point is that he uses the same criteria that government funded research groups, such as the IRR, have used to compile their lists of victims of race based homicide.
If we are to assume that only a sliver, say ten percent, of the killings of whites by non-whites using the same criteria the IRR used in their report were indeed race based, we would find that genuine race based homicides of whites by non-whites totally eclipse purported white homicides of non-whites, and that's not even filtering the IRR list for specious classification.
By far, whites in the UK are the biggest victims of race-based homicide than of any other race in the UK. What speaks volumes is the media cover up of non-white racism that often takes the form of violence against Whites.
Britain has seen its share of recent cases where predators from certain communities seem to prey exclusively on whites. If the situation were reversed, one must wonder how the media, government commissars and the general public, especially the white and minority special interest groups, would respond to such stories.
http://www.politic.co.uk/9599-nick-grif ... crime.html
BTW who were you refering to as my 'chum' (how very english LOL) on that other topic????
