Ahead of Jack and Henry!!!
Wow...!!! Have the Moslems finally taken over Britain!!!????
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... Harry.html
the message board for Dubai English speaking community
shafique wrote::occasion7:
Now just wait for the Daily Mail brigade to untwist their knickers and start posting!
Dubai Knight wrote:You'll know when you go to the pub and order a pint of Mohammed Bin John Al Smith's best bitter!
Knight
Dubai Knight wrote:You'll know when you go to the pub and order a pint of Mohammed Bin John Al Smith's best bitter!
Knight
Dubai Knight wrote:You'll know when you go to the pub and order a pint of Mohammed Bin John Al Smith's best bitter!
Knight
symmetric wrote:Dubai Knight wrote:You'll know when you go to the pub and order a pint of Mohammed Bin John Al Smith's best bitter!
Knight
LOOOOOL !!
-- Fri Oct 29, 2010 9:32 pm --
Adding to what Shafique mentioned, the double name thing was really common in the past.
Not much that I heard of in Arabia honestly, but in Persia it was VERY common (not sure about today).
My grandfather's brothers names were as the following ..
Mohamad-Amin
Mohamad-Sharif
Mohamad-Noor
Mohamad-Saleh
But often they'll be called with shortcuts such as Mohamad-Sharif becomes "Masharif".
There are plenty of names that are double for both genders.
The double names starting with Mohammad has a religious background, and it's somehow to do with Sufism.
Usually, the second part of the name (that comes after Mohammad) is an adjective. For instance "Mohammad-Sharif", Sharif means "noble", thus it means "Mohammad the noble". The name itself is a praise for prophet Mohammad. This is a very cultural thing among Iranians.
Tom Jones wrote:
There was a Pakistani doctor, who was living in the same compound I stayed in for a while in KSA, whose first name was Mohammed Ali.
He told me he’d been in KSA for a very long time and finally was able to get his Saudi citizenship.
During the naturalization process, they told him he had to change his first name to either Mohammed or Ali, as no double names are allowed for Saudi citizens.
I don’t know why. Perhaps it has something to do with the Wahabi beliefs.
Perhaps Shafique knows more about it .
shafique wrote:^TJ - nope, that one is a new one on me. Islam doesn't really say much about names - the only thing that comes to mind is that names that were associated with pagan gods were changed to 'Muslim' names when a person converted - and converts sometimes (not always) may choose an Arabic name when they convert.
shafique wrote:Salah-uddin was a Kurd from Tikrit in Iraq - Saddam Hussein's home town.
However, the name is an Arabic name 'Salah -ud-din' means "righteousness (Salah) of the Faith(Din/Deen)"
Noor-udin for example, means 'light of faith'; 'noorullah' = light of Allah..
But the issue of the double barrelled names in Saudi is a bit odd - I'll ask the next time I'm there.
Cheers,
Shafique
Chocoholic wrote:Actually this is complete and utter BS from the Daily Mail, who're just trying to cause discontent with people again!
Here are the ACTUAL statistics - Mohommed doesn't even figure!
http://www.statistics.gov.uk/pdfdir/names1010.pdf
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11635125
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/22/20101028/ts ... 1ccfa.html
So there! Don't take what that trashy rag writes as gospel, they're reknowned for writing rubbish!
The official list, which covers all births in 2009 in England and Wales, has Mohammed at number 16 but this does not include the many different spellings, which are all ranked separately.
When they are added in, Mohammed zooms all the way up to top spot for the first time.
blueshift wrote:but they seem to be entirley accurate.
FTD wrote:blueshift wrote:but they seem to be entirley accurate.
The BBC beg to differ - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11635125
blueshift wrote:FTD wrote:blueshift wrote:but they seem to be entirley accurate.
The BBC beg to differ - http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11635125
Ok, I'll probably regret engaging in a battle of witts with an unarmed person, but if you are following this discussion at all, you will note nobody is disputing that Mohammed is not the most popular name if you only consider one single spelling and if you consider that 'Mohamed' and 'Mohammed' are two completely different names.
There is no need for you to make a point that nobody is disputing.
blueshift wrote:Ok, I'll probably regret engaging in a battle of witts with an unarmed person,
FTD wrote:blueshift wrote:Ok, I'll probably regret engaging in a battle of witts with an unarmed person,
"wits"
Also, if you want rubbish the participant instead of contributing to the debate, it's more effective if you use your own material that isn't decades old.
blueshift wrote:My own material that isn't decades old? That doesn't make any sense.
blueshift wrote:please feel free to rubbish the DM out of spite for having the temerity to present information in a way that you don't find pleasing.