I've read a lot of posts recently from people commenting on bias journalism.
Admittedly, I am western and don't know everything or even as much as I would like to know about the deeper details surrounding the Israeli / Palestine conflict.
However and more importantly, of course I believe every loss of life is a travesty, particularly in these circumstances, and there is nobody who could rightly argue against that.
That said, my point surrounds the fact there are so many people who claim western media is biased towards Israel and represents the whole of Palestine as a country of terrorists. Excuse my language, but thats just bullsh*t.
If you go to The Guardian website, a London-based broadsheet newspaper, they give as unbiased a report on what's going on there as possible. They say something bad Israel did, then they say somethign bad Hamas did, then they repeat the process until they've said as much as they can. It's not biased.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/ja ... za-attacks
However, if you then go to Gulf News website, they are completely biased and don't actually tell of any facts other than how terrible Israel is.
http://www.gulfnews.com/indepth/gaza/index.html
So I can't begin to imagine how ridiculously biased the Arabic news sources many people get their information from are. Moreover, if that is the only kind of journalism some people have ever known then its no surprise the rest of the world, incorrectly, thinks that the middle-east and many surrounding countries live with blindfolds on.
It seems as long as the area someone lives in is ruled by dictatorships and religion, rather than democracy and something you can see, hear, touch, taste, or smell, then that society will cease to evolve.
I make no secret that when it comes to faith, whilst i'm respectful of yours, I'm still finding mine.
However, my perception is that nobody from the Islamic world cares whether Hamas, Hezbollah, etc are right or wrong, and the more vociferous opinion of this forum's Moslem followers seems uninterested in any discussion regarding the demerits of Hamas' current tactic, but they'd rather blindly argue that Israeli's simply shouldn't be there, so the only answer is to kill each?
I reiterate I don't suppport either "side", I support life, and the right to an educated and non-influenced opinion. Which is apparently not a luxury afforded to the people of the vast majority of non-democratic Moslem countries unless they actively choose to pursue it.
However, if we are factual, Israel will not be moved any time soon. Although they're people (the vast majority of which didn't choose to be born into that land) will shed a lot of blood - although not as much as Palestinians.
What will happen in two or three generations time, when the original settlers in Israel are long gone and those who live there know no different - will they still continue bombing each other?
Surely there will come a point where a society needs to evolve with the time, and evolution comes through education. So for as long as one of the largest religions in the world which commands the following of such a vast number of the people living on this single planet (the vast majority of whom live in poverty) then the starting block for peace in the middle east is the cessation of the biased journalism which so many in this part of the world believe is the only source of guidance on what is happening to their Moslem brothers?
How many Islamic countries have a democratic government?
If a country's ruler makes decisions for its people, and doesn't allow those people access to a full and balanced education, then those rulers are stopping their society's evolution. Your evolution.