I've been for the longest time trying to beileve the official story but there just so many holes in it that for any logical persons to beileve it is almost impossible, one has to take huge leaps of faiths to believe it. Anybody who's spent a little time even on PC flight simulator let alone a comericial liner can tell you that for some one who just did some basic traning on a single engine propeler plane cannot pull off those manuveres. And with such deadly accuracy
Its like taking a few lessons at Emirates Driving school and wining the Grand Prix. Professional pilots with 1000's of hours of flying the planes supposedly used in the attacks say it is physically impossible for the planes to do what they have said to have done (www.pilotsfor911truth.org)
The Pancake theory is been debunked so many times its not even funny anymore. The best case secanrio ( again making huge leaps of faith by believeing the official story ) say it would take around 20 to 40 seconds for a building to go according to the pancake theory and not the actual 8 seconds. And that too on a building designed to take impacts for planes.
The fuel fires heating the supporting beams to an extend they lost integrity that the buckled ( around 1400 C ) but that would cause the top of the tower to lean over and fall and not come down straight. Clear as day video footage of surviors waving for help through the gaping holes caused by the crash. Not possible for humans to stand in the heat. Pictures of neatly cut an angle ( like in a shape charge cut used in demolitions ). Video of flashes on both the planes and buildings well before they made contact also remained unexplained. Like something being fired and then impacting seconds before the plane themselves impact. And these cannot be explained away as sunlight or shadows as every angle shows them
Ok now lets just make a huge leap of faith and say the towers came down because of the impacts.
What about WTC 7 was not hit by any plane and yet came down on it own foot print. Again lclear as day footage of a BBC report with the WTC 7 standing in the background and a correspondent reported it has collapsed ? around 15 min earlier than it did. A building comes down due to some scattered fires ?
Not even going to into the penatgon and the united crash in penn.
Like I said I really want to believe the official story but there are more holes in it than a truck full of swiss cheese. Also the lack of answering or putting to rest any of the questions raised by the govt just raises suspscion. Like Condi Rice on video a day after I beileve saying the govt has unrefutable proof that it was the work of OBL, nine years on we have to see this proof.
Also previous actions by the US govt also do not help towards the finger slowly pointing towards them. And then also declassified papers about flase flag operations like operation northwood and many other similar false flag operations show that it is not beyond them.
I've looked into almost everything there is to look from both sides all the 9/11 debunkers out there, the famous popular mechanics debunking videos and articles for example and yet only very few and minor questions have been answered. The biggest ones still remain as is.
All in all if anyone could prove to me, not without a shadow of doubt but with in reasonable measure that what is said to have happened, happened I'll go for it. Until then when it comes to the matter of 9/11 I'll be gladly accept being labeled as a troofer, tin foiler or whatever other term there is out there.