Dubai Forums Dubai Discussions Dubai Politics Talk Philosophy and Religion Forums

pinoy1 wrote:Someone please educate me on this one...
Since the topic's about Islam and science (thus technological innovations), I've HEARD before that Islam tells muslims to shun away from these materialistic technological advances. Am I entirely wrong?

Yes, on the contrary Islam encourages science and discovery

Say: "Travel through the earth and see how Allah did originate creation; so will Allah produce a later creation: for Allah has power over all things (29:20)

Now let man but think from what he is created! (86:5)

Behold! in the creation of the heavens and the earth, and the alternation of night and day,- there are indeed Signs for men of understanding,-
Those who remember God, standing, sitting and lying on their sides, and reflect on the creation of the heavens and the earth:'Our Lord, You have not created this for nothing. Glory be to You! So safeguard us from the punishment of the Fire. (3:190-191)

Do they not consider the kingdom of the heavens and the earth and whatever things Allah has created, and that may be their doom shall have drawn nigh; what announcement would they then believe in after this? (7:185)

Say: "Travel through the earth and see what was the end of those before (you): Most of them worshipped others besides Allah." (30:42)

He it is Who made the sun a shining brightness and the moon a light, and ordained for it mansions that you might know the computation of years and the reckoning. Allah did not create it but with truth; He makes the signs manifest for a people who have knowledge (10:5)

uaebadoo wrote:

scot1870 wrote:

uaebadoo wrote:Influence on European science
Further information: Latin translations of the 12th century
Contributing to the growth of European science was the major search by European scholars for new learning which they could only find among Muslims, especially in Islamic Spain and Sicily. These scholars translated new scientific and philosophical texts from Arabic into Latin.

Yup, you confirmed your input was next to nothing. Translating books centuries ago? Forget the, you guys had it cornered years ago.

I would go as far as to say the shopping trolley is a greater invention than anything out of the Islamic world in the last 100 years.

Read 123456789 and 0
These are ARABIC Numbers, without them no ( steam engine, telephone, television, internet or anything vaguely important) as you said could have been invented, even your name scot1870 can't be written without using Arabic Numbers

The "arabic" numbers isnt even arabic to begin with, it only reached the western world via the arabs n therefore the arabs are credited for it. But the origin seem to be India.

And its the same thing with many arabic/muslim "inventions". In the early centuries of Islam and arabic culture it expanded very quickly. The arabs conquered big areas in the mid. east. An area known for many great civilizations. They learned a lot from those civilizations and preserved it. During this time Europe was in the dark ages and science wasnt evolving at all, but when Europe came out of the darkness they got to learn a lot from the arabs, and miscrediting them for being the inventors while they in reality just had been preserving ancient science. Oh, and an addition to that, the arabs wasnt only preserving, they burned down the library of alexandria and much of the ancient science went lost along with unvaluable historical information.

Theres of course some pure arabic inventions too, and the arabs played a big part in leading the way for todays science by preserving ancient knowledge that wudve gone lost in europe durin the dark age otherwise. Either way, Europe and the western world was and still is (even though this is about to change) the leading area in science and technology, saying anything else is just ridicoulus. Atleast for the last 500 years all important discoveires has been made in the west, and the wests contribution to science is pretty much incomparable.


OnT:

The miracles of the koran doesnt really seem like miracles to me. I'll explain later if I have time. Theres some things thats remarkable that a 700th century beduin wudve known but calling it miracle is a bit far. Its all about interpretation of the text. Either way, can it really be called scientific miracle when we have to discover it first in order to be able to interpretate it the right way? Why doesnt it for example say "The montains are created from the tectonail plates colliding"? then i wudve gone and converted right away.

sry, double post

node88 wrote:OnT:

The miracles of the koran doesnt really seem like miracles to me. I'll explain later if I have time. Theres some things thats remarkable that a 700th century beduin wudve known but calling it miracle is a bit far. Its all about interpretation of the text. Either way, can it really be called scientific miracle when we have to discover it first in order to be able to interpretate it the right way? Why doesnt it for example say "The montains are created from the tectonail plates colliding"? then i wudve gone and converted right away.

It appears you have done some reading on the role the Islamic civilization/empire played in the preservation and transmission of earlier scientific materials. This also extended to literature, poetry and even music. You play down the new achievements - i.e. advancements made by the Muslims. Fair enough - this is what some 'orientalist' writers portray, but just a wander around Ibn Battuta mall puts this into context... anyway, I'm sure others will be able to enumerate the advances made in sciences, mathematics, astronomy etc by Muslim and Non-Muslim poly-maths under the Golden era of the Islamic Empire.

However, I wanted to ask you a question based on the above quote:

Going back just a few decades back, say, how would you have explained to the average man in the street what a microwave oven is and how it operates? What words would you use that they would understand? Would you speak in scientific terms and be understood, or would you express the concepts in terms and words they would understand?

How would you explain to a person from 150 years ago how you could see and speak to a person standing on the moon (let alone describe how they would get there)?

I ask the questions just to make the point that descriptions from 1500 years ago of natural phenomena necessarily do not use technical/scientific terms because these terms had not yet been invented.

The miracles of the Quran are many. On the scientific claims, the Quran's verses are remarkable in that as new scientific discoveries are made (uncovering God's work), one is amazed to look back at the verses of the Quran and find that they are in total agreement and even (with the benefit of hind-sight) an exposition of the findings.

The Nobel Laureate for Physics awarded in 1979, Prof. Abdus Salaam was the first Muslim awarded this prize for science - and his prize was for work he did predicting the unification of two of the fundamental forces of nature. He was at the cutting edge of science, but also wrote a lot on how the Quran was his guiding light and that all his findings were in total accordance with the Quran. He pointed out that the Quran has more verses advocating believers to study the creation of God (i.e. Science) than there were verses stating the 'rules'/'laws' that mankind should follow - I think it was at least twice as many verses telling people to study creation.

However, at the end of the day religion is based on faith - I take a logical approach and believe in things that make sense to me. This approach does not apply to many others - for them logic is not as important, but personal experience, cultural significance or just what they were born into are more important.

From the first records of religion, there have always been two reactions to miracles - those who see them as miracles, and those who dismiss them or disregard them. No record exists of people seeing a miracle - or experiencing a prophecy fulfilled - and then all agreeing to the truth of the prophet/messenger (the closest though is the account of the people of Jonah who did repent, pray and have the punishment averted.). That is not how God created us - at the root of our existence is the choice God has given us.

If it wasn't for free will, there would be no need for religion, laws, heaven, hell etc.

All the best.

Cheers,
Shafique

shafique wrote:

node88 wrote:OnT:

The miracles of the koran doesnt really seem like miracles to me. I'll explain later if I have time. Theres some things thats remarkable that a 700th century beduin wudve known but calling it miracle is a bit far. Its all about interpretation of the text. Either way, can it really be called scientific miracle when we have to discover it first in order to be able to interpretate it the right way? Why doesnt it for example say "The montains are created from the tectonail plates colliding"? then i wudve gone and converted right away.

It appears you have done some reading on the role the Islamic civilization/empire played in the preservation and transmission of earlier scientific materials. This also extended to literature, poetry and even music. You play down the new achievements - i.e. advancements made by the Muslims. Fair enough - this is what some 'orientalist' writers portray, but just a wander around Ibn Battuta mall puts this into context... anyway, I'm sure others will be able to enumerate the advances made in sciences, mathematics, astronomy etc by Muslim and Non-Muslim poly-maths under the Golden era of the Islamic Empire.

However, I wanted to ask you a question based on the above quote:

Going back just a few decades back, say, how would you have explained to the average man in the street what a microwave oven is and how it operates? What words would you use that they would understand? Would you speak in scientific terms and be understood, or would you express the concepts in terms and words they would understand?

How would you explain to a person from 150 years ago how you could see and speak to a person standing on the moon (let alone describe how they would get there)?

I ask the questions just to make the point that descriptions from 1500 years ago of natural phenomena necessarily do not use technical/scientific terms because these terms had not yet been invented.

The miracles of the Quran are many. On the scientific claims, the Quran's verses are remarkable in that as new scientific discoveries are made (uncovering God's work), one is amazed to look back at the verses of the Quran and find that they are in total agreement and even (with the benefit of hind-sight) an exposition of the findings.

The Nobel Laureate for Physics awarded in 1979, Prof. Abdus Salaam was the first Muslim awarded this prize for science - and his prize was for work he did predicting the unification of two of the fundamental forces of nature. He was at the cutting edge of science, but also wrote a lot on how the Quran was his guiding light and that all his findings were in total accordance with the Quran. He pointed out that the Quran has more verses advocating believers to study the creation of God (i.e. Science) than there were verses stating the 'rules'/'laws' that mankind should follow - I think it was at least twice as many verses telling people to study creation.

However, at the end of the day religion is based on faith - I take a logical approach and believe in things that make sense to me. This approach does not apply to many others - for them logic is not as important, but personal experience, cultural significance or just what they were born into are more important.

From the first records of religion, there have always been two reactions to miracles - those who see them as miracles, and those who dismiss them or disregard them. No record exists of people seeing a miracle - or experiencing a prophecy fulfilled - and then all agreeing to the truth of the prophet/messenger (the closest though is the account of the people of Jonah who did repent, pray and have the punishment averted.). That is not how God created us - at the root of our existence is the choice God has given us.

If it wasn't for free will, there would be no need for religion, laws, heaven, hell etc.

All the best.

Cheers,
Shafique

The thing is that not even the ppl 1500 years ago understood what it was saying. Otherwise it wudve been a big aid in helping us with making advances in science. But guess what, it had to be discovered in the western non islamic world first for people to be able to make the right interpretation of it. Those words can be interpretated in a thousand different ways, and to me the way its interpretaded at that site seems pretty cramped and far off. Theyve tried really hard making it fit todays science, but its hardly a miracle. The only things thats spot on are basic stuff thats not that hard to know even for a 700th century man.

And talking about that, what about the stuff that contradicts todays science? That sperm is produced between the backbone and the ribs for example. How can the holy book be wrong about such a basic thing? Or are todays science wrong about such a simple thing? And whats up with the sun settling in a muddy pond? That doesnt seem very scientific to me...

node88 wrote:And talking about that, what about the stuff that contradicts todays science? That sperm is produced between the backbone and the ribs for example. How can the holy book be wrong about such a basic thing? Or are todays science wrong about such a simple thing? And whats up with the sun settling in a muddy pond? That doesnt seem very scientific to me...

node88 - please give me the references and translations of the verses according to where you got these from, and I'll look them up and comment on these for you.

I don't recall the reference of sperm in relation to the backbone and ribs, so am intrigued.

As for the sun setting in a muddy pond, this does ring a bell - but please refresh my memory with the reference and I'll post the correct translation for you and explain this one (sun set, you will know from your science lessons is only relevant to a being on a rotating planet - and today depending on where you are, the sun sets into the sea or land).

I note however that you chose not to answer my questions about what words you would use.. disapointed, but not surprised.


Oh, almost forgot - doesn't the fact that people did not understand the cryptic references 1500 years ago, but that these do make sense today say something about the foresight of the Quran?

Cheers,
Shafique

shafique wrote:

node88 wrote:And talking about that, what about the stuff that contradicts todays science? That sperm is produced between the backbone and the ribs for example. How can the holy book be wrong about such a basic thing? Or are todays science wrong about such a simple thing? And whats up with the sun settling in a muddy pond? That doesnt seem very scientific to me...

node88 - please give me the references and translations of the verses according to where you got these from, and I'll look them up and comment on these for you.

I don't recall the reference of sperm in relation to the backbone and ribs, so am intrigued.

As for the sun setting in a muddy pond, this does ring a bell - but please refresh my memory with the reference and I'll post the correct translation for you and explain this one (sun set, you will know from your science lessons is only relevant to a being on a rotating planet - and today depending on where you are, the sun sets into the sea or land).

I note however that you chose not to answer my questions about what words you would use.. disapointed, but not surprised.


Oh, almost forgot - doesn't the fact that people did not understand the cryptic references 1500 years ago, but that these do make sense today say something about the foresight of the Quran?

Cheers,
Shafique

"Now let man but think from what he is created! He is created from a drop emitted-Proceeding from between the backbone and the ribs," (Qur'an 86:5-7).

And accoring to the verse at the miracles site this drop is sperm most probably.

"We created man from an extract of clay. Then We made him as a drop in a place of settlement, firmly fixed. Then We made the drop into an alaqah (leech, suspended thing, and blood clot), then We made the alaqah into a mudghah (chewed substance)... " (Quran, 23:12-14)


And the verse about the sun settling in a muddy pond

Koran 18:86
"Till, when he [the traveller Zul-qarnain] reached the setting-place of the sun, he found it going down into a muddy spring..."

This verse further suggests that the sun is orbiting around the earth.

Koran 36:40 "It is not for Sun to overtake the moon, nor doth the night outstrip the day. They float each in an orbit."

Ure probably gonna interpretate that in a totally different way than me, but compare these verses to the one in the scientific miracles site. Isnt these verses clearer than many of the ones on that site? But i guess u see what u want to see, but i suppose it isnt very convincing to most people thats not muslim though.

Im sure that if there was a scientific miracle site a thousand years ago when ppl believed that the earth was flat, those last two verses wud be hailed as miracles. Its all about interpretation but its hardly convincing and definatly not miracles.

And about the words used, Ill have to agree with u, of course theres a barrier to how much ppl cudve understood back then. Explaining the internet to a 700th century man wudve been impossible. But we are able to teach kids without any prior education many of those things (listed at the miracles site) quite easily. How come god cant explain it better than this. Chewed substance = an embryo? Even I can come up with a better explanation than that.

node88 wrote:

"Now let man but think from what he is created! He is created from a drop emitted-Proceeding from between the backbone and the ribs," (Qur'an 86:5-7).

And accoring to the verse at the miracles site this drop is sperm most probably.

"We created man from an extract of clay. Then We made him as a drop in a place of settlement, firmly fixed. Then We made the drop into an alaqah (leech, suspended thing, and blood clot), then We made the alaqah into a mudghah (chewed substance)... " (Quran, 23:12-14)

The second quotation talking about creation from a blood-clot is a very good description of a fertilized egg before it becomes a recognisable foetus - incredible stuff!

The first verse is pretty impressive stuff as well - saying that a person is created from a sperm, something that wasn't confirmed by science until much later. I'll have to look up the translation of the latter part of the verse and see whether it is as you have copied, and whether it is referring to the sperm or the development of the foetus (if correctly translated).

node88 wrote:And the verse about the sun settling in a muddy pond

Koran 18:86
"Till, when he [the traveller Zul-qarnain] reached the setting-place of the sun, he found it going down into a muddy spring..."

This reads to me like a description of a human (Dhul Qarnain) reaching the western-most part of his land to find it was a 'muddy' body of water. Do you think any person reading this verse thinks that the Sun physically goes into a muddy pool?

node88 wrote:This verse further suggests that the sun is orbiting around the earth.

Koran 36:40 "It is not for Sun to overtake the moon, nor doth the night outstrip the day. They float each in an orbit."

I can't see how you get from the above descriptions that celestial bodies have 'fixed' orbits and don't crash into each other - nor do I see where it says that the sun orbits the earth - it just says it has an orbit.

This is an incredible statement to come out of Arabia 1500 years ago - and again, literally has been proved true by scientific progress.

node88 wrote:Ure probably gonna interpretate that in a totally different way than me, but compare these verses to the one in the scientific miracles site. Isnt these verses clearer than many of the ones on that site? But i guess u see what u want to see, but i suppose it isnt very convincing to most people thats not muslim though.

I don't expect people to be convinced, but I would hope that objections are limited to facts and not propaganda. From the above, at worst you could argue that these are luck predictions that have been proved correct by science, or that they are sufficiently general that they cannot be 'proved wrong'. What cannot be disputed is that they haven't been proved wrong by science.

However, at the end of the day the Quran is not a manual on physics, but a religious book which contains God's final law to mankind and contains the literal word of God (as claimed by the book itself), and one of the logical features of such a book (if the claims are true) is that it should not contain contradictions, or facts which later proved to be wrong or contrary to science.

I will look up the reference to the ribs - but I note with satisfaction that the translations you have given prove the point of this thread magnificently - I thank you for this.

node88 wrote:Im sure that if there was a scientific miracle site a thousand years ago when ppl believed that the earth was flat, those last two verses wud be hailed as miracles. Its all about interpretation but its hardly convincing and definatly not miracles.

People's hearts are not moved by miracles or scientific prophecies. This just a fact. It would be a hollow faith to just follow something because it is amazing - David Copperfield will be considered a 'god' if that was the case

node88 wrote:And about the words used, Ill have to agree with u, of course theres a barrier to how much ppl cudve understood back then. Explaining the internet to a 700th century man wudve been impossible. But we are able to teach kids without any prior education many of those things (listed at the miracles site) quite easily. How come god cant explain it better than this. Chewed substance = an embryo? Even I can come up with a better explanation than that.

Why choose one of the meanings 'chewed substance' when another i.e. 'blood clot' is a better fit in the context? You gave this meaning above ... did you not read what you posted?

How better will you describe a ball of cells of an early fertilized egg (zygote) - how is it NOT like a 'clot of blood'?

You say you can come up with a better explanation - please let us hear it.

Cheers,
Shafique

86.5-7
So let man consider of what he is created.
He is created of gushing fluid,
Which issues forth from between the loins and the breastbones.


Commentary
It is characteristic of the Quranic style that it substitutes mild or vague words of expressions for harsh and blunt ones. 'From between the loins and the breast-bones' is one of such euphemisms used by the Quran. The verse may signify that man is born of the water that comes out of the loins of his father and is fed by the breast of his mother. The fact that man has been created from a fluid which gushes forth and then falls may signify that he has been endowed with great natural faculties to make rapid progress but he is also likely to fall to the lowest depths of degradation, if he does not make proper use of those God-given powers. The verse signifies that man's spiritual development is subject to alternate periods of progression and retrogression, like the seminal fluid that gushes forth and then falls.


The translation given by the previous poster has 'back-bone' instead of 'loins' - it will be interesting to go back to the arabic words of the verse and see which is the correct translation.

Cheers,
Shafique

I don't get this, what is scientific about the author of the quran having the knowledge that semen from a man's loins makes baby's when deposited in a females loins (sorry tried to be as un graphic as possible).

Surely that was common knowledge even back then.

shafique wrote:

node88 wrote:

"Now let man but think from what he is created! He is created from a drop emitted-Proceeding from between the backbone and the ribs," (Qur'an 86:5-7).

And accoring to the verse at the miracles site this drop is sperm most probably.

"We created man from an extract of clay. Then We made him as a drop in a place of settlement, firmly fixed. Then We made the drop into an alaqah (leech, suspended thing, and blood clot), then We made the alaqah into a mudghah (chewed substance)... " (Quran, 23:12-14)

The second quotation talking about creation from a blood-clot is a very good description of a fertilized egg before it becomes a recognisable foetus - incredible stuff!

The first verse is pretty impressive stuff as well - saying that a person is created from a sperm, something that wasn't confirmed by science until much later. I'll have to look up the translation of the latter part of the verse and see whether it is as you have copied, and whether it is referring to the sperm or the development of the foetus (if correctly translated).

node88 wrote:And the verse about the sun settling in a muddy pond

Koran 18:86
"Till, when he [the traveller Zul-qarnain] reached the setting-place of the sun, he found it going down into a muddy spring..."

This reads to me like a description of a human (Dhul Qarnain) reaching the western-most part of his land to find it was a 'muddy' body of water. Do you think any person reading this verse thinks that the Sun physically goes into a muddy pool?

node88 wrote:This verse further suggests that the sun is orbiting around the earth.

Koran 36:40 "It is not for Sun to overtake the moon, nor doth the night outstrip the day. They float each in an orbit."

I can't see how you get from the above descriptions that celestial bodies have 'fixed' orbits and don't crash into each other - nor do I see where it says that the sun orbits the earth - it just says it has an orbit.

This is an incredible statement to come out of Arabia 1500 years ago - and again, literally has been proved true by scientific progress.

node88 wrote:Ure probably gonna interpretate that in a totally different way than me, but compare these verses to the one in the scientific miracles site. Isnt these verses clearer than many of the ones on that site? But i guess u see what u want to see, but i suppose it isnt very convincing to most people thats not muslim though.

I don't expect people to be convinced, but I would hope that objections are limited to facts and not propaganda. From the above, at worst you could argue that these are luck predictions that have been proved correct by science, or that they are sufficiently general that they cannot be 'proved wrong'. What cannot be disputed is that they haven't been proved wrong by science.

However, at the end of the day the Quran is not a manual on physics, but a religious book which contains God's final law to mankind and contains the literal word of God (as claimed by the book itself), and one of the logical features of such a book (if the claims are true) is that it should not contain contradictions, or facts which later proved to be wrong or contrary to science.

I will look up the reference to the ribs - but I note with satisfaction that the translations you have given prove the point of this thread magnificently - I thank you for this.

node88 wrote:Im sure that if there was a scientific miracle site a thousand years ago when ppl believed that the earth was flat, those last two verses wud be hailed as miracles. Its all about interpretation but its hardly convincing and definatly not miracles.

People's hearts are not moved by miracles or scientific prophecies. This just a fact. It would be a hollow faith to just follow something because it is amazing - David Copperfield will be considered a 'god' if that was the case

node88 wrote:And about the words used, Ill have to agree with u, of course theres a barrier to how much ppl cudve understood back then. Explaining the internet to a 700th century man wudve been impossible. But we are able to teach kids without any prior education many of those things (listed at the miracles site) quite easily. How come god cant explain it better than this. Chewed substance = an embryo? Even I can come up with a better explanation than that.

Why choose one of the meanings 'chewed substance' when another i.e. 'blood clot' is a better fit in the context? You gave this meaning above ... did you not read what you posted?

How better will you describe a ball of cells of an early fertilized egg (zygote) - how is it NOT like a 'clot of blood'?

You say you can come up with a better explanation - please let us hear it.

Cheers,
Shafique

The fact that man is created from sperm has been well known way before muhammeds time. Contraceptives was used in ancient greece and in the roman empire, usually by putting animal intestine over the penis to stop the sperm. Its not exactly rocket science to figure that out, and im pretty sure that the pagans living around muhammed also had that knowledge from before.

The reason to why i choosed embryo = chewed substance is because of this, "..We made the alaqah into a mudghah (chewed substance)". Earlier in the text it says that alaqah means blood clot. Im not arabic speaking but i assumed that mudghah dint mean blood clot as well. But alrite, "We made the blood clot into a blood clot" (?).

About the sun and the muddy spring, ure right it can be interpretated in both ways. But how can someone reach the setting place of the sun, the sun doesnt settle at all, or it settles everywhere depending on where u are. Its not like its a place u reach. But lets leave that, I remembered that verse to be more than just that, something about the mud starting to boil and making noise when the sun settled in it. But Ive been unable to find it so I suppose its just my memory playing tricks with me.


About the orbits, this is what i meant with the interpretation. To me it says that the moon and the sun each have their own orbit around the earth. But u suggest that its refering to the suns orbit around our galaxy? Btw how come the koran can be interpretated in so many different ways? Isnt it suposed to be clear?

And u say that the koran doesnt contain any contradictions, but theres many of them in there. Muslims Ive spoken to say thats cause Islam evolved and it had to be easy on its followers in the beginning during the transfer period or wtv to call it. But there is contradictions in it. And I dont see what those stuff are doin in there at all, the book is supposed to be laws for an eternity, why is there stuff in there that only applied to people during a few years more than a thousand years ago? Why dint they removed it from there after the message was completed? And how come its special laws for muhammed in the holy book? Its supposed to be for all people for all time, why waste space on muhammeds special laws, when they cudve used that space to explain embrylogoly with better words than chewed substance for example.

And the explanation to the drop created between the ribs and backbone, I just dont buy it. Its turning and twisting words to fit with todays science. Of course it is possible to interpretate it that way, but i think its pretty damn far off compared to the interpretation i did of it. The whole thing about how a baby is created is pretty flawed, in the hadiths theres many more examples of muhammeds lacking knowledge in the matter, but lets concentrate on the koran for now to make it easier. But if u have time, please look it up in arabic and share with me, im not arabic speaking as i said but it feels as if non-muslims translate it in a way that suits their points while muslims translate it in a way that suits theirs.

I never said that the verse stating man being created from sperm was a scientific miracle of the Quran - and the Quran itself doesn't make this a big point, in context the verse is saying that man should ponder from whence he came...

As for the Quran being clear - well, we don't have to speculate on this point, the Quran itself clarifies. It is written in clear language - pure Arabic - but contains verses which are self-evident and others which are not so clear and subject to interpretation:

Chapter 3 (Aal-e-`Imran): Verse 7

He it is who has sent down to thee the Book; in it there are verses that are firm and decisive in meaning - they are the basis of the Book - and there are others that are susceptible of different interpretations. But those in whose hearts is perversity pursue such thereof as are susceptible of different interpretations, seeking to cause discord and seeking wrong interpretations of it. And none knows its right interpretation except Allah and those who are firmly grounded in knowledge; they say, 'We believe in it; the whole is from our Lord.' - And none take heed except those gifted with understanding -


Chapter 41 (Ha Mim Al-Sajdah): Verse 44

And if We had made it a Qur'an in a foreign tongue, they, surely, would have said, 'Why have not its verses been made clear? What! a foreign tongue and an Arab Prophet?' Say, 'It is a guidance and a healing for those who believe.' But as to those who believe not, there is a deafness in their ears and to them it is blindness. They are, as it were, being called from a far-off place.


Cheers,
Shafique

shafique wrote:I never said that the verse stating man being created from sperm was a scientific miracle of the Quran - and the Quran itself doesn't make this a big point, in context the verse is saying that man should ponder from whence he came...

As for the Quran being clear - well, we don't have to speculate on this point, the Quran itself clarifies. It is written in clear language - pure Arabic - but contains verses which are self-evident and others which are not so clear and subject to interpretation:

Chapter 3 (Aal-e-`Imran): Verse 7

He it is who has sent down to thee the Book; in it there are verses that are firm and decisive in meaning - they are the basis of the Book - and there are others that are susceptible of different interpretations. But those in whose hearts is perversity pursue such thereof as are susceptible of different interpretations, seeking to cause discord and seeking wrong interpretations of it. And none knows its right interpretation except Allah and those who are firmly grounded in knowledge; they say, 'We believe in it; the whole is from our Lord.' - And none take heed except those gifted with understanding -


Chapter 41 (Ha Mim Al-Sajdah): Verse 44

And if We had made it a Qur'an in a foreign tongue, they, surely, would have said, 'Why have not its verses been made clear? What! a foreign tongue and an Arab Prophet?' Say, 'It is a guidance and a healing for those who believe.' But as to those who believe not, there is a deafness in their ears and to them it is blindness. They are, as it were, being called from a far-off place.


Cheers,
Shafique

I never said u claimed it to be a miracle, u called it impressive and that science dint confirm it until much later. And i was just hinting that it isnt very incredible at all since its been known for a pretty long time.

I still dont see how the second verse is incredible either.

We have the drop, which as i said earlier was something commonly known for ages.

Then theres the blood clot, which also is something that was believed to happen long before muhammed came up with the idea. Women have their period once a month, then it stops when the pregnancy occurs, ppl used to believe that what didnt come out started to form the baby, a blood clot. Nothing miraculous about that.

Then we got the chewed substance. And chewed substance isnt a very spot on description really, a chewed substance can look a thousand different ways. Depending on what u eat, how long u chew, how u chew etc. I can form all kind of different things with a gum, as they have done on that site. Its hardly a miracle.


As for the koran claryfying itself. I dont see the point of it. Why not write it clear to begin with. Why are only those "gifted with understandind" supposed to get what it means. It only creates confusion. Its pretty important stuff we are talking about here, burning in hell for an eternity or goin to heaven. Why not make it as a law book that everyone could understand. And why give man the gift of thinking and doubting and then give them a book to follow that can be doubted. Its stupid. Only points to the koran not being divine and someone making a fail safe way of securing possible errors by saying the doubting people only interpretates it the wrong way. Why make it interpretetable to begin with.

And arabic being a clear language? Written arabic isnt very clear afaik, especially not at muhammeds time. No wowels just the base of the words, which means the same written word cudve meant many different things. But i guess u as an arabic speaker know more about that than me.

Neways, I saw that u skipped some of my questions. I hope u get time to answer them as well.

Cheers

Thanks Shafique for your explanation

I invite eveybody to read about THE MIRACLE OF IRON

http://www.miraclesofthequran.com/scientific_30.html

and more

http://www.miraclesofthequran.com/scientific_index.html

uaebadoo wrote:Thanks Shafique for your explanation

I invite eveybody to read about THE MIRACLE OF IRON

http://www.miraclesofthequran.com/scientific_30.html

and more

http://www.miraclesofthequran.com/scientific_index.html

I dont even know were to begin. Do u honestly consider that to be a miracle? "sent down" is a pretty common word in religious scriptures, since god is somehow believed to be above. And Iron was the most important metal in muhammeds time too, no iron = no weapons. But it cud be used for lots of other stuff too, frying pans or wtv. It feels like u are misusing the word miracle here. Infact all atoms on earth comes from space, its not like they have been here for an eternity. And all elements except hydrogen was once formed in the stars. There is however radioactive decay of heavier elements that creates new elements here on earth too, and that includes Iron.

I took a look at the second link now as well, and this is getting really ridicoulus. There is some things thats interesting to debate, but that site is a little bit to eager to claim miracles in each n every verse of the koran, theres some serious misuse of the word miracle. But since i got some time over ill comment some of them..

Reduced movement at night
http://www.miraclesofthequran.com/scientific_84.html

"He splits the sky at dawn, and appoints the night as a time of stillness and the Sun and Moon as a means of reckoning. (Qur'an, 6:96)"

Whats the miracle in that? The verse is obviously using a poetic form of describing the night. Even if it was refeering to certain hormones in the body that makes people move less or wtv, its still not a verse only god cudve been the author to. Look at a sleeping person, hes not moving, doesnt require todays science to figure that out.


Man is created from clay
http://www.miraclesofthequran.com/scientific_59.html

Oh, really? Thats news to me. Obviously we have some of the same elements as clay, but we are mostly made out of water. This cant be called a miracle can it? Its rather the other way around.

This is the argument for the verse being a miracle;
"When the human body is examined today, it may be discovered that many elements present on the earth are also to be found in the body. Living tissues contain 95% carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, phosphorus and sulphur, with a total of 26 different elements.91 In another verse of the Qur'an we are told:

We created man from an extract of clay. (Qur'an, 23:12)

The Arabic word "sulala," translated as "extract" in the verse, means "representative example, essence." As we have seen, the information revealed in the Qur'an 1,400 years ago confirms what modern science tells us-the fact that the same elements are employed in human creation as those found in the soil."

Yeah, we are not extraterrestrials, of course we got the same elements in our body as those that can be found on earth. Proves that we are made of clay? NO.

The elements in the body can be found in the soil, thats right. Nothing weird with that either since most of what we eat origin from vegetables that once grew in the soil, sometimes via an animal first. But is soil and clay the same thing? NO, so is this a miracle? NO.


Rain which brings a dead land back to life.
http://www.miraclesofthequran.com/scientific_30.html

"… We send down from heaven pure water so that by it We can bring a dead land to life and give drink to many of the animals and people We created. (Qur'an, 25:48-49)"

How is this a scientific miracle? I highly doubt that people back then dint know that water made things grow.


Sigh, i got better things to do, i just wanted to show that u shudnt believe things at first sight. I cant understand how people can call these things scientific miracles, surely non of the educated muslims here wud call these things miracles? There might be miracles in that book, but most of this stuff is just BS, ppl are too eager to find "miracles" so they go with whatever there is.

node88 wrote:As for the koran claryfying itself. I dont see the point of it. Why not write it clear to begin with. Why are only those "gifted with understandind" supposed to get what it means. It only creates confusion. Its pretty important stuff we are talking about here, burning in hell for an eternity or goin to heaven. Why not make it as a law book that everyone could understand. And why give man the gift of thinking and doubting and then give them a book to follow that can be doubted. Its stupid. Only points to the koran not being divine and someone making a fail safe way of securing possible errors by saying the doubting people only interpretates it the wrong way. Why make it interpretetable to begin with.

What parts of the Quranic law are hard for you to understand?

If you go back and read the Quranic verse I posted, it says that there are clear, unambiguous verses of the Quran and they form the main part of the book.

Whether the Quran contains scientific miracles or not is a matter of opinion - I just view them as an interesting aspect of the Quran, but the main message of the Quran is not that it is a book describing nature, but a book describing how man should live one's life. In that regard it is very clear - how one should treat fellow humans, God's creatures and how to attain peace within and peace without - peace with oneself and be at peace with your Creator.

Arabic is a unique language and another miracle of the Quran is the basic fact that it is the only language of its age that is currently understood by more people now than at any other point in its history - i.e. the number of people who speak and understand Arabic continues to grow, whilst all other languages have faded away in terms of numbers. The Quranic Arabic is pure and unparalleled and is there for all to read, and for those who do not understand Arabic, translations are readily available.

The facts relating the Arabic language can be considered a 'miracle' by some, others will think it just an interesting fact that may be true but doesn't prove the veracity of the Quran.

For me, God says in the Quran he will protect the Quran - that says to me that the Quran won't be changed and that the means of understanding the original words will never be lost - Arabic will not go the way of Latin and Hebrew and become only a liturgical language so that only some of the people will understand the scriptures. The fact that Arabic is more understood now than before, for me is a 'miracle'... but I would hazard a guess that you are not impressed.

Anyway, I wish you well in your search for truth.

Cheers,
Shafique

shafique wrote:

node88 wrote:As for the koran claryfying itself. I dont see the point of it. Why not write it clear to begin with. Why are only those "gifted with understandind" supposed to get what it means. It only creates confusion. Its pretty important stuff we are talking about here, burning in hell for an eternity or goin to heaven. Why not make it as a law book that everyone could understand. And why give man the gift of thinking and doubting and then give them a book to follow that can be doubted. Its stupid. Only points to the koran not being divine and someone making a fail safe way of securing possible errors by saying the doubting people only interpretates it the wrong way. Why make it interpretetable to begin with.

What parts of the Quranic law are hard for you to understand?

If you go back and read the Quranic verse I posted, it says that there are clear, unambiguous verses of the Quran and they form the main part of the book.

Whether the Quran contains scientific miracles or not is a matter of opinion - I just view them as an interesting aspect of the Quran, but the main message of the Quran is not that it is a book describing nature, but a book describing how man should live one's life. In that regard it is very clear - how one should treat fellow humans, God's creatures and how to attain peace within and peace without - peace with oneself and be at peace with your Creator.

Arabic is a unique language and another miracle of the Quran is the basic fact that it is the only language of its age that is currently understood by more people now than at any other point in its history - i.e. the number of people who speak and understand Arabic continues to grow, whilst all other languages have faded away in terms of numbers. The Quranic Arabic is pure and unparalleled and is there for all to read, and for those who do not understand Arabic, translations are readily available.

The facts relating the Arabic language can be considered a 'miracle' by some, others will think it just an interesting fact that may be true but doesn't prove the veracity of the Quran.

For me, God says in the Quran he will protect the Quran - that says to me that the Quran won't be changed and that the means of understanding the original words will never be lost - Arabic will not go the way of Latin and Hebrew and become only a liturgical language so that only some of the people will understand the scriptures. The fact that Arabic is more understood now than before, for me is a 'miracle'... but I would hazard a guess that you are not impressed.

Anyway, I wish you well in your search for truth.

Cheers,
Shafique

Yeah ure right, my bad. The laws are clear, most of them atleast.

Arabic is pretty unique, ur right. But afaik the reason to why it remained the same and hasnt evolved as other languages is because of the koran. So ur right in a way, but its rather because the koran has been kept almost the same, which has prevented the language from evolving. Look at the bible, it has been rewritten many times with "up to date" language, the bible has adopted to the evolution of the language, while arabic has gone the other way, adopted to the language used in the koran. Which means it has reamined the same. I am actually quite impressed of arabic, just because its the only language that hasnt evolved, but that got nothing to do with Islam being the truth i think. Its just cause it hasnt been allowed to evolve because of the koran. Btw, i was told that theres almost like two different types of arabic, one that is used in daily language (thats evolved a bit) and one traditional that people learn in order to read the koran properly in religion class or wtv. I dont know if theres any truth in that though.

And since u wish me luck in finding the truth... believe it or not but thats what im trying, the reason to why ive even been reading up on islam is because i got a muslima gf n need to convert if i wanna go further with things. But it isnt goin very well though. I got some serious trouble with some things in islam. Mostly its the koran not being very peaceful all the time n peace is smthn my version of god wud preach for. Theres a lot of calls for violence, and i dont really like the way women are supposed to be treated according to the islamic god either. But the major problem for now is that the koran has changed, theres even 7 different arabic versions of it at this day, which is in contradiction with verse 15.9 and it feels like the whole concept of islam falls on that point. Theres some other stuff too, like some of the stuff Muhamed did for example. Ah, well, i shudnt be talking about those stuff in this thread i suppose.

Cheers

Isn't it that when something is "scientific" (i.e., accurate facts, methods), then you can't consider it a miracle (i.e., of divine intervention, defiance of nature/physics) and vice versa?
That's why as soon as I read the first item about the human fetus development being at first a "blood clot", and then a "chewed substance", I thought the word "scientific" shouldn't have been in the title. If it's indeed scientific then the writing should have precisely said that that a sperm from a man has fertilized a woman's egg (it's not just a blood clot!)... ...thus forming a human fetus (chewed substance... )

node88 wrote:I took a look at the second link now as well, and this is getting really ridicoulus. There is some things thats interesting to debate, but that site is a little bit to eager to claim miracles in each n every verse of the koran, theres some serious misuse of the word miracle. But since i got some time over ill comment some of them..

Reduced movement at night
http://www.miraclesofthequran.com/scientific_84.html

"He splits the sky at dawn, and appoints the night as a time of stillness and the Sun and Moon as a means of reckoning. (Qur'an, 6:96)"

Whats the miracle in that? The verse is obviously using a poetic form of describing the night. Even if it was refeering to certain hormones in the body that makes people move less or wtv, its still not a verse only god cudve been the author to. Look at a sleeping person, hes not moving, doesnt require todays science to figure that out.


.

But you did not mention the same fact written about Plants and Movement at the molecular level , also , If someone try to always sleep during the daytime and stay awake all night long, let's say for 2 weeks, I am sure he will be sick or at least feel sleepy.
How can Prophet Mohammed Know the fact that movement of plants and molocules decrease at night.

uaebadoo wrote:But you did not mention the same fact written about Plants and Movement at the molecular level , also , If someone try to always sleep during the daytime and stay awake all night long, let's say for 2 weeks, I am sure he will be sick or at least feel sleepy.
How can Prophet Mohammed Know the fact that movement of plants and molocules decrease at night.

With all respect - the quran does not talk about the change of molecular structure of plants at night. The quote the website author 'He splits the sky at dawn, and appoints the night as a time of stillness and the Sun and Moon as a means of reckoning. (Qur'an, 6:96)'.

Stillness suggests the night is a time of rest and quiet and sleep 'in the still of the night'. A well established fact way before Islam even started.

When I read 6.96 I interpret it as a very poetic way of portraying the cyclic patterns of day and night. How two opposites are so contingent upon each other (yin / yang) and our a key part of a humans experience.

To be honest I think this website is farcical. I would much rather read Spiritual interpretations that relate the quran to modern times rather then trying to show its scientific basis. They have been trying to do that with the bible for many years and they never get anywhere - this was cemented when Darwin came along and saw a bigger picture.

jabbajabba wrote:

uaebadoo wrote:But you did not mention the same fact written about Plants and Movement at the molecular level , also , If someone try to always sleep during the daytime and stay awake all night long, let's say for 2 weeks, I am sure he will be sick or at least feel sleepy.
How can Prophet Mohammed Know the fact that movement of plants and molocules decrease at night.

With all respect - . The quote the website author 'He splits the sky at dawn, and appoints the night as a time of stillness and the Sun and Moon as a means of reckoning. (Qur'an, 6:96)'.

Stillness suggests the night is a time of rest and quiet and sleep 'in the still of the night'. A well established fact way before Islam even started.

When I read 6.96 I interpret it as a very poetic way of portraying the cyclic patterns of day and night. How two opposites are so contingent upon each other (yin / yang) and our a key part of a humans experience.

To be honest I think this website is farcical. I would much rather read Spiritual interpretations that relate the quran to modern times rather then trying to show its scientific basis. They have been trying to do that with the bible for many years and they never get anywhere - this was cemented when Darwin came along and saw a bigger picture.

My friend I thank u for ur reply, you r right the the quran does not talk about the change of molecular structure of plants at night, The article states simply that every body knows that at night humans rest and relax but the word in the Holly Quraan Says (No movement) or in Scentific Term static and not Dynamic, The article gives two other example , the palnts , and the Movement at the molecular level and how can any one 1400 years ago say such a fact, how did he know about Plants and molecluar level and plants photosynthesis slows down at night

quote="node88"]

Man is created from clay
http://www.miraclesofthequran.com/scientific_59.html

Oh, really? Thats news to me. Obviously we have some of the same elements as clay, but we are mostly made out of water. This cant be called a miracle can it? Its rather the other way around.

This is the argument for the verse being a miracle;
"When the human body is examined today, it may be discovered that many elements present on the earth are also to be found in the body. Living tissues contain 95% carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, phosphorus and sulphur, with a total of 26 different elements.91 In another verse of the Qur'an we are told:

We created man from an extract of clay. (Qur'an, 23:12)

The Arabic word "sulala," translated as "extract" in the verse, means "representative example, essence." As we have seen, the information revealed in the Qur'an 1,400 years ago confirms what modern science tells us-the fact that the same elements are employed in human creation as those found in the soil."

Yeah, we are not extraterrestrials, of course we got the same elements in our body as those that can be found on earth. Proves that we are made of clay? NO.

The elements in the body can be found in the soil, thats right. Nothing weird with that either since most of what we eat origin from vegetables that once grew in the soil, sometimes via an animal first. But is soil and clay the same thing? NO, so is this a miracle? NO.


.[/quote]


So u r saying the caly and soil are not the same , I am really amazed, ask any person what are the types of soil, he will tell u: one of them is clay soil
If I tell you this airplane or car is made out of stainless steel , would you believe me right away, I woulnt, because it could be made out of Aluminum, Composites, Tatinum. How can u tell without analyzing the material composotion, So similiarly no one could tell in the past that human body have the same compostion as the soil. Tell me PLZ what are plants made of, How about aniamls?

uaebadoo wrote:

node88 wrote:
Man is created from clay
http://www.miraclesofthequran.com/scientific_59.html

Oh, really? Thats news to me. Obviously we have some of the same elements as clay, but we are mostly made out of water. This cant be called a miracle can it? Its rather the other way around.

This is the argument for the verse being a miracle;
"When the human body is examined today, it may be discovered that many elements present on the earth are also to be found in the body. Living tissues contain 95% carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen, phosphorus and sulphur, with a total of 26 different elements.91 In another verse of the Qur'an we are told:

We created man from an extract of clay. (Qur'an, 23:12)

The Arabic word "sulala," translated as "extract" in the verse, means "representative example, essence." As we have seen, the information revealed in the Qur'an 1,400 years ago confirms what modern science tells us-the fact that the same elements are employed in human creation as those found in the soil."

Yeah, we are not extraterrestrials, of course we got the same elements in our body as those that can be found on earth. Proves that we are made of clay? NO.

The elements in the body can be found in the soil, thats right. Nothing weird with that either since most of what we eat origin from vegetables that once grew in the soil, sometimes via an animal first. But is soil and clay the same thing? NO, so is this a miracle? NO.


.

So u r saying the caly and soil are not the same , I am really amazed, ask any person what are the types of soil, he will tell u: one of them is clay soil
If I tell you this airplane or car is made out of stainless steel , would you believe me right away, I woulnt, because it could be made out of Aluminum, Composites, Tatinum. How can u tell without analyzing the material composotion, So similiarly no one could tell in the past that human body have the same compostion as the soil. Tell me PLZ what are plants made of, How about aniamls?

In the koran it says "sticky clay", is this what plants usually grow in? Im not sure of the composition of the sticky clay the koran refers to. But using "the fact that the same elements are employed in human creation as those found in the soil" as an argument to prove the koran doesnt work. Cause it doesnt say "soil" anywhere in the koran. It says clay and sticky clay.. and in yet another place it says we are made out of nothing.

If clay is a type of soil, that still doesnt mean that all the elements in the soil can be found in clay.

We are not made out of clay. We might have some of the same elements, but even if all of them were the same, they differ at a molecular level. Theyre part of bigger molecules. Theres a reason to why we eat vegetables and animals and not clay. Cause we need other elements and substances than those found in clay. In some soil we can find almost every element we need. But soil and clay is just not the same thing no matter how much u want it to be.

If u read the text on the site u realise that they dont even make a point about it. They say what the koran says, and then they list some elements found in the body and thats it. They dont make an comparison between the elements of clay and the elements of the human body. Its pseudo science. They draw a conclusion without even presenting facts to be able to make that conclsuion. But u seem to believe in it, so i suppose they managed to fool someone atleast.

uaebadoo wrote:

jabbajabba wrote:

uaebadoo wrote:But you did not mention the same fact written about Plants and Movement at the molecular level , also , If someone try to always sleep during the daytime and stay awake all night long, let's say for 2 weeks, I am sure he will be sick or at least feel sleepy.
How can Prophet Mohammed Know the fact that movement of plants and molocules decrease at night.

With all respect - . The quote the website author 'He splits the sky at dawn, and appoints the night as a time of stillness and the Sun and Moon as a means of reckoning. (Qur'an, 6:96)'.

Stillness suggests the night is a time of rest and quiet and sleep 'in the still of the night'. A well established fact way before Islam even started.

When I read 6.96 I interpret it as a very poetic way of portraying the cyclic patterns of day and night. How two opposites are so contingent upon each other (yin / yang) and our a key part of a humans experience.

To be honest I think this website is farcical. I would much rather read Spiritual interpretations that relate the quran to modern times rather then trying to show its scientific basis. They have been trying to do that with the bible for many years and they never get anywhere - this was cemented when Darwin came along and saw a bigger picture.

My friend I thank u for ur reply, you r right the the quran does not talk about the change of molecular structure of plants at night, The article states simply that every body knows that at night humans rest and relax but the word in the Holly Quraan Says (No movement) or in Scentific Term static and not Dynamic, The article gives two other example , the palnts , and the Movement at the molecular level and how can any one 1400 years ago say such a fact, how did he know about Plants and molecluar level and plants photosynthesis slows down at night

But the koran doesnt say anything about the movement at a molecular level in plants. It just says the stillness of night and nothing else. I used "the stillness of night" in a poem i wrote when i was nine... How can a nine year old without education know such a fact? Does this mean im a prophet with divine inspiration? No, its just a poetic form of describing the night. It got nothing to do with the movements in plants. Have u ever been awake late at night u can notice that things are quiet n still.

node88 wrote:.

In the koran it says "sticky clay", is this what plants usually grow in? Im not sure of the composition of the sticky clay the koran refers to. But using "the fact that the same elements are employed in human creation as those found in the soil" as an argument to prove the koran doesnt work. Cause it doesnt say "soil" anywhere in the koran. It says clay and sticky clay.. and in yet another place it says we are made out of nothing.

If clay is a type of soil, that still doesnt mean that all the elements in the soil can be found in clay.

Again, Clay is a type of soil, so it has the same compostion as the soil as stated in the Holy Quraan

We are not made out of clay. We might have some of the same elements, but even if all of them were the same, they differ at a molecular level. Theyre part of bigger molecules. Theres a reason to why we eat vegetables and animals and not clay. Cause we need other elements and substances than those found in clay. In some soil we can find almost every element we need. But soil and clay is just not the same thing no matter how much u want it to be.

Soil and Clay are different , Does not make sense !!!!, Can you explain the differences

If u read the text on the site u realise that they dont even make a point about it. They say what the koran says, and then they list some elements found in the body and thats it. They dont make an comparison between the elements of clay and the elements of the human body. Its pseudo science. They draw a conclusion without even presenting facts to be able to make that conclsuion. But u seem to believe in it, so i suppose they managed to fool someone atleast.[/quote]

Islam and quraan dont need me or anyone to prove that they are the truth and for your information, I can assure you no one can fool me as you claimed

Watch these Unquestionable Evdients
Listen to people why they became muslims

Prof. of Mathematics (Ex-Atheist) on Accepting Islam

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2z73ohM_ ... re=related

Christian professor Converts to Islam

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIiSe6rk ... re=related



German Scientist & his wife,clinic assistant convert 2 islam

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uP-2IqH_ ... re=related


Scientist From Czech Republic Converts To Islam

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dK00xTkM ... re=related

British Catholic Priest Converted To ISLAM

uaebadoo wrote:

node88 wrote:.

In the koran it says "sticky clay", is this what plants usually grow in? Im not sure of the composition of the sticky clay the koran refers to. But using "the fact that the same elements are employed in human creation as those found in the soil" as an argument to prove the koran doesnt work. Cause it doesnt say "soil" anywhere in the koran. It says clay and sticky clay.. and in yet another place it says we are made out of nothing.

If clay is a type of soil, that still doesnt mean that all the elements in the soil can be found in clay.

Again, Clay is a type of soil, so it has the same compostion as the soil as stated in the Holy Quraan

We are not made out of clay. We might have some of the same elements, but even if all of them were the same, they differ at a molecular level. Theyre part of bigger molecules. Theres a reason to why we eat vegetables and animals and not clay. Cause we need other elements and substances than those found in clay. In some soil we can find almost every element we need. But soil and clay is just not the same thing no matter how much u want it to be.

Soil and Clay are different , Does not make sense !!!!, Can you explain the differences

If u read the text on the site u realise that they dont even make a point about it. They say what the koran says, and then they list some elements found in the body and thats it. They dont make an comparison between the elements of clay and the elements of the human body. Its pseudo science. They draw a conclusion without even presenting facts to be able to make that conclsuion. But u seem to believe in it, so i suppose they managed to fool someone atleast.

Islam and quraan dont need me or anyone to prove that they are the truth and I can assure you no one can fool me as you claimed and I know very well how to spin people in debates, so dont think about it

Watch these Unquestionable Evdients
Listen to people why they became muslims

Prof. of Mathematics (Ex-Atheist) on Accepting Islam

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2z73ohM_ ... re=related

Christian professor Converts to Islam

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nIiSe6rk ... re=related



German Scientist & his wife,clinic assistant convert 2 islam

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uP-2IqH_ ... re=related


Scientist From Czech Republic Converts To Islam

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dK00xTkM ... re=related

British Catholic Priest Converted To ISLAM

[/quote]

and is this also said in the holy Quran? to paste links of some convert stories on u tube?
Islam may teach a person to think and live according to the book but it clearly shuts one's eyes and vision to think beyond religious boundaries.
How sad.
A book is a book... whether holy or not.. good writers words can be interpreted in many different ways.. even more so if the book is written in parables..... sometimes its a surprise to the authors to know how intelligent(or Dimwits?) are his readers..Most of the religious texts can be interepreted the way you want to read it. Hence, jihad - is a call for war for some and Jihad- call to kill ones' own ego n ill feelings for some other folks.

node88 wrote:

shafique wrote:

node88 wrote:
And since u wish me luck in finding the truth... believe it or not but thats what im trying, the reason to why ive even been reading up on islam is because i got a muslima gf n need to convert if i wanna go further with things. But it isnt goin very well though.

hey node88.... if the only reason you are planning to convert to islam is because you want to marry ur girlfriend, then dont bother... its like cutting your feet to fit in your shoes because you cant find shoes that fit your feet...

PS if you are a christian then you really dont have to bother at all... islam permits us muslims to marry christians....

SparHawk wrote:

node88 wrote:

shafique wrote:

node88 wrote:
And since u wish me luck in finding the truth... believe it or not but thats what im trying, the reason to why ive even been reading up on islam is because i got a muslima gf n need to convert if i wanna go further with things. But it isnt goin very well though.

hey node88.... if the only reason you are planning to convert to islam is because you want to marry ur girlfriend, then dont bother... its like cutting your feet to fit in your shoes because you cant find shoes that fit your feet...

PS if you are a christian then you really dont have to bother at all... islam permits us muslims to marry christians....

When it comes to inter-religious marriage, family n society matters more than the two individuals involved..