- rudeboy wrote:
shahrez no point in posting links like this. ppl in the west will believe what ever their politicans tell them to believe in. and yet they mock muslims for being brainwashed by the "islamic" extremists lol bunch on nutters.
by the way watch loose change a movie by an american whose eyes are open :D
One thing that western countries share is a hatred of politicans. And they would love to be able to prove any conspiracy theory if it were possible.
Unfortunately, it is not, and the French bird who won an oscar just kissed her career goodbye.
- benwj wrote:
and the French bird who won an oscar just kissed her career goodbye.
what's the story? I've just read a babelfish translated news about this. wasnt a big deal. how's that gonna affect her career?
- spoonman wrote:
- benwj wrote:
and the French bird who won an oscar just kissed her career goodbye.
what's the story? I've just read a babelfish translated news about this. wasnt a big deal. how's that gonna affect her career? - benwj wrote:
Because as you know hollywood is in America, so even if the conspiracy theory was possible, they wouldn't give her a job anyway.
And the rest of the industry now thinks that she is a nutter.
OK, so she didn't actually say that 911 was fabricated, and it is OK to at least question the possibility, but she should have thought about it a bit more before airing her opinion.
- kanelli wrote:
Yeah, damn those engineers for not constructing the world's largest skyscrapers to withstand airplane hits and full tanks worth of burning jet fuel for a couple of hours. Those of you who believe that the US government used demolition explosives to blow up the buildings are complete morons.
Maybe you should watch the videos before casting aspersions.
Burning for a couple of hours? How long after the crashes did the buildings come down?
What about WTC 7. Did anything hit that?
Where's the CCTV of those guys in/near the airports?
- Chocoholic wrote:
Well K, I hate to say it, but yes they were built to withstand plane impacts! It certainly wasn't the first time that a plane had crashed into a skyscraper.
She's a clown.
Wasn't it Hitler who said 'the bigger the lie, the more people will believe it.'?
- Chocoholic wrote:
Hey don't talk to Kanelli like that. She's a great person!
She called me a moron. Fair's fair.
- Chocoholic wrote:
Well K, I hate to say it, but yes they were built to withstand plane impacts! It certainly wasn't the first time that a plane had crashed into a skyscraper.
You are sorta correct Chocs.
Yes they were built to withstand a plane impact, but those were planes dating from the 60/70's.
The planes built in the 90's etc were much bigger with even bigger fuel capacities.
- dresden wrote:
You are both correct, it was constructed to withstand a plane hit and an earthquake. No one fathomed that a 747 would be launched into it.
Also, the reason the building came down is because the fuel started to trickle down the building's frame (while on fire). This severly weakened the structure of the building and therefore it came down.
For anyone who knows anything about building construction, it came down how it was intended to do, not just fall over like a domino.
It looks like bombs were detonated, but thats physics.
When you crush a coke can, it bends to the sides, not the bottom. Now when it started to come down from the top, the pressure built up on the way down and caused the floors underneath to push 'outward' from the pressure.
There are just as many - even more - 'experts who knows anything about building construction' who claim it was not hot enough to melt steel and the buildings came down like controlled explosions.
WT7. Can anyone justify that collapse?
- arniegang wrote:
- Chocoholic wrote:
Well K, I hate to say it, but yes they were built to withstand plane impacts! It certainly wasn't the first time that a plane had crashed into a skyscraper.
You are sorta correct Chocs.
Yes they were built to withstand a plane impact, but those were planes dating from the 60/70's.
The planes built in the 90's etc were much bigger with even bigger fuel capacities. - Chocoholic wrote:
They're not THAT much bigger with THAT much more fuel capacity.
- kanelli wrote:
Any looney tune who believes that 911 was a US conspiracy can call me whatever they want, because they are out of their minds anyway. :)
Sad, narrow-minded, illiterate, never been anywhere, never done anything, never read anything little tick. Don't take me on. Go and get your teeth seen to.
- shahrez wrote:
This video has been removed due to terms of use violation!!!
WHERE IS IT??? ITS GONEEEEEE!!!
- Slayer666 wrote:
- shahrez wrote:
This video has been removed - shahrez wrote:
I wonder why?
- Del wrote:
- kanelli wrote:
Any looney tune who believes that 911 was a US conspiracy can call me whatever they want, because they are out of their minds anyway. :)
Sad, narrow-minded, illiterate, never been anywhere, never done anything, never read anything little tick. Don't take me on. Go and get your teeth seen to. - kanelli wrote:
So wrong on all counts. :) I'll take you on any day honey!
- Del wrote:
I've only been here one week and you bore me already.
You can have the last word after this.
Let me make the last word.
911 never happened.
Nor did the Holocaust, Roswell, the Moon Landings, Lee Harvey Oswald shooting John F Kennedy, the Hoover Files and a thousand other events that the conspiracy theorists have tried to warp and confuse over the years.
The truth will never come out.
Some now very, very dead twats flew planes into buildings in New York in front of millions of people and killed a hell of a lot more in the process. End of story. Sh1t happens. Move on.
:roll: :roll: :roll:
Knight